Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 7, 2016

Money Buys Happiness When Spending Fits Our Personality

Abstract

In contrast to decades of research reporting surprisingly weak relationships between consumption and happiness, recent findings suggest that money can indeed increase happiness if it is spent the “right way” (e.g., on experiences or on other people). Drawing on the concept of psychological fit, we extend this research by arguing that individual differences play a central role in determining the “right” type of spending to increase well-being. In a field study using more than 76,000 bank-transaction records, we found that individuals spend more on products that match their personality, and that people whose purchases better match their personality report higher levels of life satisfaction. This effect of psychological fit on happiness was stronger than the effect of individuals’ total income or the effect of their total spending. A follow-up study showed a causal effect: Personality-matched spending increased positive affect. In summary, when spending matches the buyer’s personality, it appears that money can indeed buy happiness.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aaker J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.
Aaker J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 45–57.
Assouline M., Meir E. I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319–332.
Caplan R. D., Harrison R. V. (1993). Person-environment fit theory: Some history, recent developments, and future directions. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 253–275.
Caprariello P. A., Reis H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 199–215.
Carli L. L., Ganley R., Piercy-Otay A. (1991). Similarity and satisfaction in roommate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 419–426.
Carter T. J., Gilovich T. (2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 146–159.
Champley S. (2015). PWR: Basic functions for power analysis. R package (Version 1.1-3). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.
DeNeve K. M., Cooper H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.
Deza M. M., Deza E. (2009). Encyclopedia of distances (1st ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
Diener E., Biswas-Diener R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.
Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J., Griffin S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Dunn E. W., Aknin L. B., Norton M. I. (2013). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.
Dunn E. W., Gilbert D. T., Wilson T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 115–125.
Furnham A., Schaeffer R. (1984). Person-environment fit, job satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 295–307.
Goldberg L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.
Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., Swann W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
Govers P. C. M., Schoormans J. P. L. (2005). Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 189–197.
Grubb E. L., Grathwohl H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31(4), 22–27.
Hill G., Howell R. T. (2014). Moderators and mediators of pro-social spending and well-being: The influence of values and psychological need satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 69–74.
Howell R. T., Hill G. (2009). The mediators of experiential purchases: Determining the impact of psychological needs satisfaction and social comparison. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 511–522.
Huang H. H., Mitchell V.-W., Rosenaum-Elliott R. (2012). Are consumer and brand personalities the same? Psychology & Marketing, 29, 334–349.
Jokela M., Bleidorn W., Lamb M. E., Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 725–730.
Kahneman D., Deaton A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 16489–16493.
Lecky P. (1945). Self-consistency: A theory of personality. New York, NY: Island Press.
Levy S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.
Marshall G. N., Wortman C. B., Kusulas J. W., Hervig L. K., Vickers R. R. Jr. (1992). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1067–1074.
McCrae R. R., John O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
Millar M., Thomas R. (2009). Discretionary activity and happiness: The role of materialism. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 699–702.
Nelson L. D., Meyvis T. (2008). Interrupted consumption: Disrupting adaptation to hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 654–664.
Oerlemans W. G. M., Bakker A. B. (2014). Why extraverts are happier: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 11–22.
Ozer D. J., Benet-Martínez V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
Rammstedt B., John O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.
Raudenbusch S. W., Bryk A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwartz B., Ward A. (2004). Doing better but feeling worse: The paradox of choice. In Linley A. P., Joseph S. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 86–104). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Sirgy M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13, 195–206.
Trapnell P. D., Campbell J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304.
Van Boven L., Gilovich T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1193–1202.
Watson D., Clark L. A., Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Williams J. E., Munick M. L., Saiz J. L., FormyDuval D. L. (1995). Psychological importance of the “Big Five”: Impression formation and context effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 818–826.
Wilson T. D., Gilbert D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.
Zhang J. W., Howell R. T., Caprariello P. A., Guevarra D. A. (2014). Damned if they do, damned if they don’t: Material buyers are not happier from material or experiential consumption. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 71–83.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 7, 2016
Issue published: May 2016

Keywords

  1. happiness
  2. consumption
  3. self-congruity
  4. psychological fit
  5. Big Five personality

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2016.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 27056977

Authors

Affiliations

Sandra C. Matz
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge
Joe J. Gladstone
Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge
David Stillwell
Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge

Notes

Sandra C. Matz, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected]
Author Contributions
S. C. Matz developed the study concept. All authors contributed to the study design. Testing and data collection were performed by S. C. Matz and J. J. Gladstone. S. C. Matz analyzed and interpreted the data under the supervision of D. Stillwell. S. C. Matz and J. J. Gladstone drafted the manuscript, and D. Stillwell provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Psychological Science.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 19825

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 88 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 97

  1. How spending decisions shape happiness in everyday life
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. The use of ChatGPT for personality research: Administering questionnaires using generated personas
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. The perceived psychological benefits of third places for university students before and after COVID-19 lockdowns
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. The influence of fear on consumers' experiential consumption preferences during public health crises: Testing multiple mediation models
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Effect of baseball stadium food service quality on outcome variables with emphasis on the moderating role of stadium atmosphere
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Does Consumer’s Happiness and Other Emotions Signaling Affect Seller’s Prices? Theory and Evidence From Six Field Studies
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Se você está contente, compra coisas? O poder preditivo do bem-estar subjetivo sobre compras materiaisIf you're happy, do you buy stuff? The predictive power of subjective well-being over material purchasesSi estás feliz, ¿compras cosas? El poder predictivo del bienestar subjetivo sobre las compras materiales
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pinching Pennies or Money to Burn?
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Does variety in hedonic spending improve happiness? Testing alternative causal mechanisms between hedonic variety and subjective well-being
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text