Abstract
Humans often fail to identify a target because of nearby flankers. The nature and stages at which this crowding occurs are unclear, and whether crowding operates via a common mechanism across visual dimensions is unknown. Using a dual-estimation report (N = 42), we quantitatively assessed the processing of features alone and in conjunction with another feature both within and between dimensions. Under crowding, observers misreported colors and orientations (i.e., reported a flanker value instead of the target’s value) but averaged the target’s and flankers’ spatial frequencies (SFs). Interestingly, whereas orientation and color errors were independent, orientation and SF errors were interdependent. These qualitative differences of errors across dimensions revealed a tight link between crowding and feature binding, which is contingent on the type of feature dimension. These results and a computational model suggest that crowding and misbinding are due to pooling across a joint coding of orientations and SFs but not of colors.
References
|
Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 7. doi:10.1167/9.10.7 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177–178. doi:10.1038/226177a0 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Caelli, T., Brettel, H., Rentschler, I., Hilz, R. (1983). Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain. Vision Research, 23, 129–133. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Derrington, A. M., Krauskopf, J., Lennie, P. (1984). Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. The Journal of Physiology, 357, 241–265. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
De Valois, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., Thorell, L. G. (1982). Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research, 22, 545–559. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Di Lollo, V . (2012). The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 317–321. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.007 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Dowd, E. W., Golomb, J. D. (2019). Object-feature binding survives dynamic shifts of spatial attention. Psychological Science, 30, 343–361. doi:10.1177/0956797618818481 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ester, E. F., Klee, D., Awh, E. (2014). Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1022–1033. doi:10.1037/a0035377 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Ester, E. F., Zilber, E., Serences, J. T. (2015). Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors. Journal of Vision, 15(1), Article 4. doi:10.1167/15.1.4 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Freeman, J., Simoncelli, E. P. (2011). Metamers of the ventral stream. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1195–1201. doi:10.1038/nn.2889 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Goris, R. L. T., Simoncelli, E. P., Movshon, J. A. (2015). Origin and function of tuning diversity in macaque visual cortex. Neuron, 88, 819–831. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.009 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Greenwood, J. A., Bex, P. J., Dakin, S. C. (2009). Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 13130–13135. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901352106 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Greenwood, J. A., Bex, P. J., Dakin, S. C. (2010). Crowding changes appearance. Current Biology, 20, 496–501. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.023 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Greenwood, J. A., Bex, P. J., Dakin, S. C. (2012). Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation. Journal of Vision, 12(3), Article 18. doi:10.1167/12.3.18 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Harrison, W. J., Bex, P. J. (2015). A unifying model of orientation crowding in peripheral vision. Current Biology, 25, 3213–3219. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.052 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Huckauf, A., Heller, D. (2014). What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects. Visual Cognition, 9, 889–910. doi:10.1080/13506280143000548A Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Keshvari, S., Rosenholtz, R. (2016). Pooling of continuous features provides a unifying account of crowding. Journal of Vision, 16(3), Article 39. doi:10.1167/16.3.39 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Kimchi, R., Pirkner, Y. (2015). Multiple level crowding: Crowding at the object parts level and at the object configural level. Perception, 44, 1275–1292. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Suppl.). Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Levi, D. M. (2008). Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48, 635–654. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A. (1986). Sampling in spatial vision. Nature, 320, 360–362. doi:10.1038/320360a0 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Manassi, M., Whitney, D. (2018). Multi-level crowding and the paradox of object recognition in clutter. Current Biology, 28, R127–R133. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.051 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Mareschal, I., Morgan, M. J., Solomon, J. A. (2010). Cortical distance determines whether flankers cause crowding or the tilt illusion. Journal of Vision, 10(8), Article 13. doi:10.1167/10.8.13 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0291-2 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nandy, A. S., Tjan, B. S. (2012). Saccade-confounded image statistics explain visual crowding. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 463–469. doi:10.1038/nn.3021 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739–744. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136–1169. doi:10.1167/4.12.12 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1129–1135. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Põder, E., Wagemans, J. (2007). Crowding with conjunctions of simple features. Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 23. doi:10.1167/7.2.23 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Robson, J. G., Graham, N. (1981). Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 21, 409–418. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Scolari, M., Kohnen, A., Barton, B., Awh, E. (2007). Spatial attention, preview, and popout: Which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 7. doi:10.1167/7.2.7 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495–508. doi:10.3758/BF03212183 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Suchow, J. W., Brady, T. F., Fougnie, D., Alvarez, G. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), Article 9. doi:10.1167/13.10.9 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Treisman, A., Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
van den Berg, R., Roerdink, J. B. T. M., Cornelissen, F. W. (2007). On the generality of crowding: Visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation. Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 14. doi:10.1167/7.2.14 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
van den Berg, R., Roerdink, J. B. T. M., Cornelissen, F. W. (2010). A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding. PLOS Computational Biology, 6(1), Article e1000646. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000646 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Vul, E., Rich, A. N. (2010). Independent sampling of features enables conscious perception of bound objects. Psychological Science, 21, 1168–1175. doi:10.1177/0956797610377341 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Whitney, D., Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160–168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Yashar, A., Chen, J., Carrasco, M. (2015). Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training. Journal of Vision, 15(10), Article 15. doi:10.1167/15.10.15 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |


