Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published July 2000

Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates

Abstract

Political debates are speech events which foreground issues of power and the `floor', and allow the opportunity of assessing the ways in which the gender of participants affects their construction as more or less powerful participants in debates. Debates in the British House of Commons are adversarial in style, making it appropriate to view the floor as `the site of a contest where there is a winner and a loser'. Previous research into political debates has found that male participants violate the formal rules in debates more than their female counterparts, in order to gain the floor. Although the canonical form and rules of debates exist to `permit the equalization of turns', rule violations are common, and inequalities between participants exist. In this article legal and illegal interventions are evaluated in five debates in order to establish the extent to which the gender of participants is related to the control that an individual has over the debate floor.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
1. This research took place between July 1998 and March 1999. The government party (elected in May 1997) was the Labour Party, the main opposition party was the Conservative Party.
2.
2. Interview data from two backbench MPs-one from the Labour Party, and one from the Liberal Democrat Party - was incorporated into this paper. Both wished to remain anonymous.
3.
3. The remaining illegal interventions were three-part exchanges that were not oppositional (they were supportive, or corrected the content of the CMP's speech in a supportive way). This type of intervention accounted for five (12%) of the 41 illegal responses. A further seven (17%) illegal responses arose from occasions in which the CMP directly addressed a sitting MP, and the sitting MP (or IMP) responded (usually by saying `yes' or `no') to the CMP. These two categories are not included in the analysis because they are not oppositional or violative of the turn-taking rights of the CMP.

References

Adams, K.L. (1992) `Accruing Power on Debate Floors', in K. Hall, M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference, pp. 1-10. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Atkinson, M. (1984) Our Master's Voices. London: Routledge.
Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (eds) (1989) Women in their Speech Communities. London: Longman.
Coates, J. (1989) `Gossip Revisited: Language in All-female Groups', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in their Speech Communities, pp. 75-94. London: Longman.
Eckert, P. and McConnell Ginet, S. (1992) `Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender and Power All Live', in K. Hall, M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Edelsky, C. (1981) `Who's Got the Floor?', Language in Society 10: 383-421.
Edelsky, C. and Adams, K.L. (1990) `Creating Equality: Breaking the Rules in Debates', Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(3): 171-190.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman.
Freed, A. (1992) `We Understand Perfectly: A Critique of Tannen's Vew of Cross-sex Communication', in K. Hall, M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Gal, S. (1991) `Between Speech and Silence: The Problematics of Research on Language and Gender', in M. Di Leonardo (ed.) Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds) (1992) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Henley, N.M. (1977) Body Politics: Power, Sex and Non-verbal Communication. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmes, J. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London/New York: Longman.
Hutchby, I. and Woofit, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hymes, D. (1972) `Models for the Interaction of Language and Social Life', in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
James, D. and Clarke, S. (1992) `Interruptions, Gender and Power: A Critical Review of the Literature', in K. Hall, M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Kendall, S. and Tannen, D. (1997) `Gender and Language in the Workplace', in R. Wodak (ed.) Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.
Lakoff, R. (1990) `Why can't a Woman be More like a Man?', in Talking Power: The Politics of Language. San Francisco, CA: Basic Books
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation', Language 50: 696-735.
Swann, J. (1989) `Talk Control: An Illustration from the Classroom of Problems in Analysing Male Dominance of Conversation', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in their Speech Communities. New York: Longman.
Wodak, R. (ed.) (1997) Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.
Woods, N. (1989) `Talking Shop: Sex and Status as Determinants of Floor Apportionment in a Work Setting', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in Their Speech Communities. London: Longman.
Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975) `Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation', in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: July 2000
Issue published: July 2000

Keywords

  1. conversation analysis
  2. ethnography
  3. floor apportionment
  4. gender and language
  5. political debates
  6. power
  7. turn-taking

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

SYLVIA SHAW
MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY, UK

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Discourse & Society.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1132

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 76 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 71

  1. I Can’t See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In-P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. La interrupción desde el eje diacrónico: análisis de dos debates legis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Women Leading the Opposition: Gender and Rhetoric in the European Parl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How Women Shape Negativity in Parliamentary Speeches—A Sentiment Analy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Between Westminster and Brussels: Putting the “Parliament” in Parliame...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Measuring the Candidates' Emotions in Political Debates Based on Facia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Measuring the inclusiveness of deliberation: structural inequality and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Putting gender on the agenda in Rio de Janeiro
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The Gendered Debate: Do Men and Women Communicate Differently in the H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Female Politicians’ Gendered Communicative Structures
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The Politics of Person Reference
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. An Exploratory Study on Linguistic Gender Stereotypes and their Effect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Using parallel content analysis to measure mediatization of politics: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Gender and Political Speech
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Curbing Their Antagonism: Topics Associated with a Reduction in Person...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Women, Language and Politics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Debating Women’s Issues on Turkish Television: Exploring the Role of P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. When a man debates a woman: Trump vs. Clinton in the first mixed gende...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Repr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Interruptions and co-construction in the First 2016 Trump–Clinton US p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision-Making at the U.S. Supre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Chapter 4. Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Comm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Chapter 5. Off the record
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Put your “big girl” voice on
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Genres of protest in post-apartheid South Africa: Revisiting audience ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. The use of face-threatening acts in the construction of in- and out-gr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Women politicians are more engaging: male versus female politicians’ a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Jane Austen, Free Indirect Style, Gender and Interiority in Literary F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Image of Politicians and Gender in Czech Daily Newspapers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Addressing women in the Greek parliament
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Female politicians: a mixed political communication model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. The endogenous construction of entrepreneurial contexts: A practice-ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister's Questions ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. The Role of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior in Televised Political Debat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Addressing women in the Greek parliament
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. A Different Voice?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Gender and Speech Styles in the 2015 General Election Debates
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Mousa-Aboulfotouh the First Arab Presidential Debate in History
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Chapter 1. “Why can’t a woman be more like a man?”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Chapter 10. Discourses of female leaders in postcolonial Hong Kong
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Acclaims, attacks and defences in Nigerian gubernatorial debate
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Ethnographic Research in Gendered Organizations: The Case of the Westm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. TRACING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES: A GROWTH CURVE AN...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from That...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Language and Talk
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Westminster parlimentarians: Performing Politics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. ‘I am not an Honourable Lady’: Gender and language in the National Ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. An Ethnographic Investigation into Gender and Language in the Northern...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ire...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Disrupting Rituals of Debate in the Indian Parliament
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. The faces of humor: Humor as catalyst of face in the context of the Br...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Authority
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Calm and Humble In and Through Evangelical Christianity: A Chinese Imm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. On Ethnomethodology, Feminism, and the Analysis of Categorial Referenc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Power and Pragmatics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Gender and Political Discourse
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Governed by the Rules?: The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Literaturverzeichnis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Casting the ‘Other’
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Gender and Political Representation in the UK: The State of the ‘Disci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: current developments ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. `Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. A Juggling Act: A feminist post-structuralist analysis of girls' and b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Constructing a Feminist Identity: Discourse and the Community of Pract...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub