![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
A bivariate copula mixed model has been recently proposed to synthesize diagnostic test accuracy studies and it has been shown that it is superior to the standard generalized linear mixed model in this context. Here, we call trivariate vine copulas to extend the bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies by accounting for disease prevalence. Our vine copula mixed model includes the trivariate generalized linear mixed model as a special case and can also operate on the original scale of sensitivity, specificity, and disease prevalence. Our general methodology is illustrated by re-analyzing the data of two published meta-analyses. Our study suggests that there can be an improvement on trivariate generalized linear mixed model in fit to data and makes the argument for moving to vine copula random effects models especially because of their richness, including reflection asymmetric tail dependence, and computational feasibility despite their three dimensionality.
References
| 1. | Jackson, D, Riley, R, White, IR. Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise. Stat Med 2011; 30: 2481–2498. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 2. | Mavridis, D, Salanti, G. A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 2013; 22: 133–158. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 3. | Ma, X, Nie, L, Cole, SR Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: an overview and tutorial. Stat Methods Med Res. (in press). DOI: 10.1177/0962280213492588. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 4. | Chu, H, Nie, L, Chen, Y Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk. Stat Methods Med Res 2012; 21: 621–633. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 5. | Chu, H, Cole, SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1331–1332. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 6. | Arends, LR, Hamza, TH, van Houwelingen, JC Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves. Med Decis Making 2008; 28: 621–638. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 7. | Hamza, TH, Arends, LR, van Houwelingen, HC Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 1–15. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 8. | Chu, H, Nie, L, Cole, SR Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection. Stat Med 2009; 28: 2384–2399. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 9. | Brenner, H, Gefeller, O. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 1997; 16: 981–991. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 10. | Leeflang, MMG, Bossuyt, PMM, Irwig, L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 5–12. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 11. | Leeflang, MMG, Rutjes, AWS, Reitsma, JB Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. CMAJ 2013; 185: E537–E544. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 12. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK . A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution. Stat Med. 2015; 34: 3842–3865. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 13. | Joe, H . Multivariate models and dependence concepts, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 14. | McNeil, AJ, Nešlehová, J. Multivariate Archimedean copulas, D-monotone functions and l1-norm symmetric distributions. Ann Stat 2009; 37: 3059–3097. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 15. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Joe, H, Chaganty, NR. Weighted scores method for regression models with dependent data. Biostatistics 2011; 12: 653–665. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 16. | Joe, H, Li, H, Nikoloulopoulos, AK. Tail dependence functions and vine copulas. J Multivar Anal 2010; 101: 252–270. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 17. | Kurowicka, D, Joe, H. Dependence modeling – handbook on vine copulae, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, 2011. Google Scholar |
| 18. | Joe, H . Dependence modeling with copulas, London: Chapman & Hall, 2014. Google Scholar |
| 19. | Hoyer, A, Kuss, O. Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests accounting for disease prevalence: a new model using trivariate copulas. Stat Med 2015; 34: 1912–1924. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 20. | Kuss, O, Hoyer, A, Solms, A. Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas. Stat Med 2014; 33: 17–30. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 21. | Demidenko, E . Mixed models: theory and applications, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Google Scholar |
| 22. | Nelsen, RB . An introduction to copulas, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006. Google Scholar |
| 23. | Sklar M. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris 1959; 8: 229–231. Google Scholar |
| 24. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Joe, H. Factor copula models for item response data. Psychometrika 2015; 80: 126–150. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 25. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Joe, H, Li, H. Vine copulas with asymmetric tail dependence and applications to financial return data. Comput Stat Data Anal 2012; 56: 659–3673. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 26. | Joe, H Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and m(m–1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. In: Rüschendorf, L, Schweizer, B, Taylor, MD (eds). Distributions with fixed marginals and related topics, Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1996, pp. 120–141. Google Scholar |
| 27. | Aas, K, Czado, C, Frigessi, A Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur Math Econ 2009; 44: 182–198. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 28. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK . On the estimation of normal copula discrete regression models using the continuous extension and simulated likelihood. J Stat Plan Inference 2013; 143: 1923–1937. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 29. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK . Efficient estimation of high-dimensional multivariate normal copula models with discrete spatial responses. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2016; 30: 493–505. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 30. | Panagiotelis, A, Czado, C, Joe, H. Pair copula constructions for multivariate discrete data. J Am Stat Assoc 2012; 107: 1063–1072. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 31. | Nash, JC . Compact numerical methods for computers: linear algebra and function minimisation, 2nd ed. New York: Hilger, 1990. Google Scholar |
| 32. | Serfling, RJ . Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics, New York: Wiley, 1980. Google Scholar |
| 33. | Stroud, AH, Secrest, D. Gaussian quadrature formulas, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966. Google Scholar |
| 34. | Joe, H Dependence comparisons of vine copulae with four or more variables. In: Kurowicka, D, Joe, H (eds). Dependence modeling: handbook on vine copulae, Singapore: World Scientific, 2011, pp. 139–164. Google Scholar |
| 35. | Hua, L, Joe, H. Tail order and intermediate tail dependence of multivariate copulas. J Multivar Anal 2011; 102: 1454–1471. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 36. | Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Karlis, D. Copula model evaluation based on parametric bootstrap. Computat Stat Data Anal 2008; 52: 3342–3353. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 37. | Paul, M, Riebler, A, Bachmann, LM Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations. Stat Med 2010; 29: 1325–1339. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 38. | Hult, H, Lindskog, F. Multivariate extremes, aggregation and dependence in elliptical distributions. Adv Appl Probab 2002; 34: 587–608. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 39. | Genest, C . Frank’s family of bivariate distributions. Biometrika 1987; 74: 549–555. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 40. | Genest, C, MacKay, J. The joy of copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Stat 1986; 40: 280–283. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 41. | Karageorgopoulos, DE, Vouloumanou, EK, Ntziora, F β-D-Glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 750–770. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 42. | Ye, Y, Xie, H, Zhao, X The oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients during acute coronary syndrome hospitalization: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2012; 11: 155–155. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 43. | Vuong, QH . Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 1989; 57: 307–333. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 44. | Genest, C, Favre, AC. Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 2007; 12: 347–368. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 45. | Shen, C, Weissfeld, L. A copula model for repeated measurements with non-ignorable non-monotone missing outcome. Stat Med 2006; 25: 2427–2440. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 46. | Mavridis, D, White, IR, Higgins, JPT Allowing for uncertainty due to missing continuous outcome data in pairwise and network meta-analysis. Stat Med 2014; 34: 721–741. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 47. | Nikoloulopoulos AK. CopulaREMADA: copula random effects model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies; 2015, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CopulaREMADA. Google Scholar |
