We describe generalized survival models, where g(S(t|z)), for link function g, survival S, time t, and covariates z, is modeled by a linear predictor in terms of covariate effects and smooth time effects. These models include proportional hazards and proportional odds models, and extend the parametric Royston–Parmar models. Estimation is described for both fully parametric linear predictors and combinations of penalized smoothers and parametric effects. The penalized smoothing parameters can be selected automatically using several information criteria. The link function may be selected based on prior assumptions or using an information criterion. We have implemented the models in R. All of the penalized smoothers from the mgcv package are available for smooth time effects and smooth covariate effects. The generalized survival models perform well in a simulation study, compared with some existing models. The estimation of smooth covariate effects and smooth time-dependent hazard or odds ratios is simplified, compared with many non-parametric models. Applying these models to three cancer survival datasets, we find that the proportional odds model is better than the proportional hazards model for two of the datasets.

1. Cox, DR . Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; 34: 187220.
Google Scholar
2. Zeng, D, Lin, D. Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data. J R Stat Soc B Stat Methodol 2007; 69: 507564.
Google Scholar | Crossref
3. Bottai, M, Zhang, J. Laplace regression with censored data. Biometrical J 2010; 52: 487503.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
4. Younes, N, Lachin, J. Link-based models for survival data with interval and continuous time censoring. Biometrics 1997; 53: 11991211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
5. Royston, P, Parmar, MK. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med 2002; 21: 21752197.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
6. Royston, P, Sauerbrei, W. A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data. Stat Med 2004; 23(5): 723748.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
7. Royston, P, Lambert, PC. Flexible parametric survival analysis using Stata: beyond the Cox model, College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2011.
Google Scholar
8. Lagakos, S . Effects of mismodelling and mismeasuring explanatory variables on tests of their association with a response variable. Stat Med 1988; 7: 257274.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
9. Groenwold, RH, Klungel, OH, Altman, DG, et al. Adjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confounding. CMAJ 2013; 185: 401406.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
10. Sauerbrei, W, Abrahamowicz, M, Altman, DG, et al. Strengthening analytical thinking for observational studies: the STRATOS initiative. Stat Med 2014; 33(30): 54135432.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
11. Leffondré, K, Jager, KJ, Boucquemont, J, et al. Representation of exposures in regression analysis and interpretation of regression coefficients: basic concepts and pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014; 29(10): 18061814.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
12. Reid, N . A conversation with Sir David Cox. Stat Sci 1994; 9(3): 439455.
Google Scholar | Crossref
13. Nelder, JA, Wedderburn, RWM. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1972; 135: 370384.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
14. Hastie, T, Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models. Stat Sci 1986; 1: 297310.
Google Scholar | Crossref
15. Breslow, NE, Clayton, DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 1993; 88(421): 925.
Google Scholar | ISI
16. Bennett, S . Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model. Stat Med 1983; 2: 273277.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
17. Nocedal, J, Wright, SJ. Numerical optimization, New York, NY: Springer, 2006.
Google Scholar | Crossref
18. Wood, S . Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.
Google Scholar | Crossref
19. Verweij, PJ, van Houwelingen, HC. Penalized likelihood in Cox regression. Stat Med 1994; 13: 24272436.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
20. Joly, P, Commenges, D, Letenneur, L. A penalized likelihood approach for arbitrarily censored and truncated data: application to age-specific incidence of dementia. Biometrics 1998; 54: 185194.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
21. Rondeau, V, Mazroui, Y, Gonzalez, JR. frailtypack: an R package for the analysis of correlated survival data with frailty models using penalized likelihood estimation or parametrical estimation. J Stat Software 2012; 47: 128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
22. Volinsky, CT, Raftery, AE. Bayesian information criterion for censored survival models. Biometrics 2000; 56: 256262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
23. Gray, RJ . Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. J Am Stat Assoc 1992; 87: 942951.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
24. Therneau, TM, Grambsch, PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model, New York, NY: Springer, 2000.
Google Scholar | Crossref
25. Gray, RJ . Spline-based tests in survival analysis. Biometrics 1994; 50: 640652.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
26. Pregibon, D . Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 1980; 29(1): 1523. 14.
Google Scholar | Crossref
27. Collett, D . Modelling survival data in medical research, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015.
Google Scholar
28. Crowley, J, Storer, BE. A reanalysis of the Stanford heart transplant data: comment. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78(382): 277281.
Google Scholar
29. R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016. http://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar
30. Crowther, MJ, Lambert, PC. Simulating biologically plausible complex survival data. Stat Med 2013; 32: 41184134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
31. Gu, C . Model diagnostics for smoothing spline ANOVA models. Can J Stat 2004; 32: 347358.
Google Scholar | Crossref
32. Kneib, T, Fahrmeir, L. A mixed model approach for geoadditive hazard regression. Scand J Stat 2007; 34: 207228.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
33. Cai, T, Betensky, RA. Hazard regression for interval-censored data with penalized spline. Biometrics 2003; 59: 570579.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
34. Gu, C . Smoothing spline ANOVA models, New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref
35. Sauerbrei, W, Royston, P. Building multivariable prognostic and diagnostic models: transformation of the predictors by using fractional polynomials. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 1999; 162: 7194.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
36. Lambert, PC, Royston, P. Further development of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. Stata J 2009; 9: 265.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
37. Prentice, RL . Exponential survivals with censoring and explanatory variables. Biometrika 1973; 60: 279288.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
38. Murphy, S, Rossini, A, van der Vaart, AW. Maximum likelihood estimation in the proportional odds model. J Am Stat Assoc 1997; 92(439): 968976.
Google Scholar | Crossref
39. Hanson, T, Yang, M. Bayesian semiparametric proportional odds models. Biometrics 2007; 63(1): 8895.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
40. Hougaard, P . Fundamentals of survival data. Biometrics 1999; 55(1): 1322.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
41. Lin, D, Spiekerman, C. Model checking techniques for parametric regression with censored data. Scand J Stat 1996; 23: 157177.
Google Scholar
42. Wood, SN . Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2008; 70: 495518.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

SMM-article-ppv for $41.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $543.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top