The era of big data is coming, and evidence-based medicine is attracting increasing attention to improve decision making in medical practice via integrating evidence from well designed and conducted clinical research. Meta-analysis is a statistical technique widely used in evidence-based medicine for analytically combining the findings from independent clinical trials to provide an overall estimation of a treatment effectiveness. The sample mean and standard deviation are two commonly used statistics in meta-analysis but some trials use the median, the minimum and maximum values, or sometimes the first and third quartiles to report the results. Thus, to pool results in a consistent format, researchers need to transform those information back to the sample mean and standard deviation. In this article, we investigate the optimal estimation of the sample mean for meta-analysis from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. A major drawback in the literature is that the sample size, needless to say its importance, is either ignored or used in a stepwise but somewhat arbitrary manner, e.g. the famous method proposed by Hozo et al. We solve this issue by incorporating the sample size in a smoothly changing weight in the estimators to reach the optimal estimation. Our proposed estimators not only improve the existing ones significantly but also share the same virtue of the simplicity. The real data application indicates that our proposed estimators are capable to serve as “rules of thumb” and will be widely applied in evidence-based medicine.

1. Guyatt, G, Cairns, J, Churchill, D Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268: 24202425.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
2. Abuabara, K, Freeman, EE, Dellavalle, R. The role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132: e2e2.
Google Scholar | Medline
3. Hozo, SP, Djulbegovic, B, Hozo, I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5.
Google Scholar
4. Wan, X, Wang, W, Liu, J Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14.
Google Scholar | Medline
5. Bland, M . Estimating mean and standard deviation from the sample size, three quartiles, minimum, and maximum. Int J Stat Med Res 2015; 4: 5764.
Google Scholar
6. Triola, MF . Elementary statistics, 11th ed. Boston: Addison Wesley, 2009.
Google Scholar
7. Johnson, R, Kuby, P. Elementary statistics, Boston: Cengage Learning, 2007.
Google Scholar
8. Nnoaham, KE, Clarke, A. Low serum vitamin D levels and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37: 113119.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
9. Cohen, J . Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, New York: Academic Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
10. Chinn, S . A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000; 19: 31273131.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
11. Davies, P, Brown, R, Woodhead, J. Serum concentrations of vitamin D metabolites in untreated tuberculosis. Thorax 1985; 40: 187190.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
12. Grange, J, Davies, P, Brown, R A study of vitamin D levels in Indonesian patients with untreated pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle 1985; 66: 187191.
Google Scholar | Medline
13. Davies, P, Church, H, Brown, R Raised serum calcium in tuberculosis patients in Africa. Eur J Resp Dis 1987; 71: 341344.
Google Scholar | Medline
14. Davies, P, Church, H, Charumilind, A Altered vitamin D homeostasis in tuberculosis. Int Med J Thailand 1988; 4: 4547.
Google Scholar
15. Chan, T, Poon, P, Pang, J A study of calcium and vitamin D metabolism in Chinese patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Trop Med Hygiene 1994; 97: 2630.
Google Scholar | Medline
16. Wilkinson, RJ, Llewelyn, M, Toossi, Z Influence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on tuberculosis among Gujarati Asians in west London: a case-control study. The Lancet 2000; 355: 618621.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
17. Sasidharan, P, Rajeev, E, Vijayakumari, V. Tuberculosis and vitamin D deficiency. J Assoc Phys India 2002; 50: 554558.
Google Scholar | Medline
18. Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG, Deeks, JJ Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003; 327: 557560.
Google Scholar | Medline
19. Arnold, BC, Balakrishnan, N. Relations, bounds and approximations for order statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol.53. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
Google Scholar
20. Chen H. Large sample theory. University Lecture 2004, http://www.math.ntu.edu.tw/∼hchen/teaching/LargeSample/notes/noteorder.pdf (accessed 30 August 2016).
Google Scholar
21. Ahsanullah, M, Nevzorov, VB, Shakil, M. An introduction to order statistics, Paris: Springer, 2013.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

SMM-article-ppv for $41.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $543.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top