Copula mixed models for trivariate (or bivariate) meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting (or not) for disease prevalence have been proposed in the biostatistics literature to synthesize information. However, many systematic reviews often include case-control and cohort studies, so one can either focus on the bivariate meta-analysis of the case-control studies or the trivariate meta-analysis of the cohort studies, as only the latter contains information on disease prevalence. In order to remedy this situation of wasting data we propose a hybrid copula mixed model via a combination of the bivariate and trivariate copula mixed model for the data from the case-control studies and cohort studies, respectively. Hence, this hybrid model can account for study design and also due to its generality can deal with dependence in the joint tails. We apply the proposed hybrid copula mixed model to a review of the performance of contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for detecting metastases in patients with melanoma.

1. Jerant, A, Johnson, J, Sheridan, C Early detection and treatment of skin cancer. Am Fam Phys 2000; 62(2): 357368.
Google Scholar | Medline
2. Xing, Y, Bronstein, Y, Ross, MI Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: A meta-analysis. J Nat Canc Inst 2011; 103(2): 129142.
Google Scholar | Medline
3. Chu, H, Cole, SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: A generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(12): 13311332.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
4. Brenner, H, Gefeller, O. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 1997; 16(9): 981991.
Google Scholar | Medline
5. Leeflang, MMG, Bossuyt, PMM, Irwig, L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: Implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62(1): 512.
Google Scholar | Medline
6. Leeflang, MM, Rutjes, AW, Reitsma, JB Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. Can Med Ass J 2013; 185(11): E537E544.
Google Scholar
7. Chu, H, Nie, L, Cole, SR Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selection. Stat Med 2009; 28(18): 23842399.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
8. Chen, Y, Liu, Y, Ning, J A hybrid model for combining case-control and cohort studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 2015; 64(3): 469489.
Google Scholar | Medline
9. Varin, C . On composite marginal likelihoods. Adv Stat Anal 2008; 92: 128.
Google Scholar | ISI
10. Varin, C, Reid, N, Firth, D. An overview of composite likelihood methods. Stat Sin 2011; 21: 542.
Google Scholar | ISI
11. Chen, Y, Liu, Y, Ning, J A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews. Stat Meth Med Res. Epub online ahead of print 14 December 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0962280214562146.
Google Scholar
12. Demidenko, E . Mixed models: Theory and applications, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
Google Scholar
13. Nikoloulopoulos, AK . A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution. Stat Med 2015; 34: 38423865.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
14. Nikoloulopoulos, AK . A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence. Stat Meth Med Res. Epub online ahead of print 11 August 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0962280215596769.
Google Scholar
15. Joe, H . Multivariate models and dependence concepts, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
Google Scholar
16. Joe, H . Dependence modeling with copulas, London: Chapman & Hall, 2014.
Google Scholar
17. Nelsen, RB . An introduction to copulas, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
Google Scholar
18. Sklar, M . Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Pub Inst Stat Univ Paris 1959; 8: 229231.
Google Scholar
19. Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Joe, H. Factor copula models for item response data. Psychom 2015; 80: 126150.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
20. Kurowicka, D, Joe, H. Dependence modeling – handbook on vine copulae, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2011.
Google Scholar
21. Joe, H, Li, H, Nikoloulopoulos, AK. Tail dependence functions and vine copulas. J Multivar Anal 2010; 101: 252270.
Google Scholar | ISI
22. Nikoloulopoulos, AK, Karlis, D. Copula model evaluation based on parametric bootstrap. Comput Stat Dat Anal 2008; 52: 33423353.
Google Scholar | ISI
23. Aas, K, Czado, C, Frigessi, A Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur Math Econ 2009; 44: 182198.
Google Scholar | ISI
24. Stober, J, Joe, H, Czado, C. Simplified pair copula constructions-limitations and extensions. J Multivar Anal 2013; 119: 101118.
Google Scholar
25. Nash, J . Compact numerical methods for computers: Linear algebra and function minimisation, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Hilger, 1990.
Google Scholar
26. Stroud, AH, Secrest, D. Gaussian quadrature formulas, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
Google Scholar
27. Joe, H Dependence comparisons of vine copulae with four or more variables. In: Kurowicka, D, Joe, H (eds). Dependence modeling: Handbook on vine copulae, Singapore: World Scientific, 2011, pp. 139164.
Google Scholar
28. Nikoloulopoulos, AK . Comment on ‘A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence’. Stat Meth Med Res 2016; 25(2): 988991.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
29. Ma, X, Chen, Y, Cole, SR A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias. Stat Meth Med Res. Epub online ahead of print 26 May 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0962280214536703.
Google Scholar
30. Nikoloulopoulos AK. CopulaREMADA: Copula mixed effect models for bivariate and trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. R package version 1.0, 2016, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CopulaREMADA.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

SMM-article-ppv for $41.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $543.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top