Published studies in Medicine (and virtually any other discipline) sometimes report that a difference or correlation did not reach statistical significance but do not report its effect size or any statistic from which the latter may be derived. Unfortunately, meta-analysts should not exclude these studies because their exclusion would bias the meta-analytic outcome, but also they cannot be included as null effect sizes because this strategy is also associated to bias. To overcome this problem, we have developed MetaNSUE, a novel method based on multiple imputations of the censored information. We also provide an R package and an easy-to-use Graphical User Interface for non-R meta-analysts.

1. Radua, J, Mataix-Cols, D, Phillips, ML, et al. A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps. Eur Psychiatry 2012; 27(8): 605611.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
2. Viechtbauer, W . Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat 2005; 30: 261293.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
3. Radua, J, Schmidt, A, Borgwardt, S, et al. Ventral striatal activation during reward processing in psychosis: a neurofunctional meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72: 12431251.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
4. Rubin, D . Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
Google Scholar | Crossref
5. Viechtbauer, W . Conducting meta-analyses in r with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 148.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
6. Li, K, Meng, X, Raghunathan, T, et al. Significance levels from repeated p-values with multiply-imputed data. Stat Sin 1991; 1: 6592.
Google Scholar | ISI
7. Fox, J . Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008.
Google Scholar
8. Tobin, J . Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 1958; 26: 2436.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
9. Schnedler, W . Likelihood estimation for censored random vectors. Econ Rev 2005; 24: 195217.
Google Scholar | Crossref
10. Veroniki, AA, Jackson, D, Viechtbauer, W, et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Meth 2016; 7: 5579.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
11. Burgess, S, White, IR, Resche-Rigon, M, et al. Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data. Stat Med 2013; 32: 44994514.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

SMM-article-ppv for $41.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $543.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top