Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online February 1, 2013

The World Within Reach: Effects of Hand Posture and Tool Use on Visual Cognition

Abstract

Our mental processing of the visual world is not independent of our physical actions within it. Placing objects near one’s hands and interacting with objects using tools can enhance visual perception, bias and prolong the allocation of attention, and distort memory in systematic ways. This suggests that the world within our reach is cognitively different from the world beyond reach. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting this conclusion, focusing on the cognitive and neural mechanisms that underlie these effects, the parameters that may control their emergence, and their potential practical applications.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abrams R. A., Davoli C. C., Du F., Knapp W. K., Paull D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047.
Adam J., Bovend’Eert T., van Dooren F., Fischer M., Pratt J. (in press). The closer the better: Hand proximity dynamically affects letter recognition accuracy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Berti A., Frassinetti F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.
Birmingham E., Ristic J., Kingstone A. (2012). Investigating social attention: A case for increasing stimulus complexity in the laboratory (pp. 251–276). In Burack J. A., Enns J. T., Fox N. A.(Eds.), Cognitive science, development, and psychopathology. Oxford University Press.
Bloesch E. K., Davoli C. C., Roth N., Brockmole J. R., Abrams R. A. (2012). Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 177–183.
Brockmole J. R., Davoli C. C., Cronin D. A. (2012). The visual world in sight and mind: How attention and memory interact to determine visual experience. In Ross B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 103–145). London, England: Elsevier.
Cosman J. D., Vecera S. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258.
Davoli C. C., Abrams R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293–295.
Davoli C. C., Brockmole J. R. (2012). The hands shield attention from visual interference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1386–1390.
Davoli C. C., Brockmole J. R., Du F., Abrams R. A. (2012). Switching between global and local scopes of attention is resisted near the hands. Visual Cognition, 20, 659–668.
Davoli C. C., Brockmole J. R., Goujon A. (2012). A bias to detail: How hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 352–359.
Davoli C. C., Brockmole J. R., Witt J. K. (2012). Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: Real, imagined, and remembered. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 80–89.
Davoli C. C., Du F., Montana J., Garverick S., Abrams R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555–562.
di Pellegrino G., Frassinetti F. (2000). Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Current Biology, 10, 1475–1477.
Drews F. A., Yazdani H., Godfrey C. N., Cooper J. M., Strayer D. L. (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51, 762–770.
Farne A., Iriki A., Ladavas E. (2005). Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: Evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 43, 238–248.
Goodhew S., Gozli D. G., Ferber S., Pratt J. (in press). Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space. Psychological Science.
Gozli D. G., West G., Pratt J. (in press). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition.
Graziano M. S. A. (2001). Is reaching eye-centered, body-centered, hand-centered, or a combination? Reviews in the Neurosciences, 12, 175–186.
Graziano M. S. A., Cooke D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44, 845–859.
Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.
Lee Y., Lee S., Carello C., Turvey M. T. (2012). An archer’s perceived form scales the “hitableness” of archery targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1125–1131.
Linkenauger S. A., Ramenzoni V., Proffitt D. R. (2010). Illusory shrinkage and growth: Body-based rescaling affects the perception of size. Psychological Science, 21, 1318–1325.
Lotan M., Gold C., Yalon-Chamovitz S. (2009). Reducing challenging behavior through structured therapeutic intervention in the controlled multi-sensory environment (Snoezelen): Ten case studies. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 8, 377–392.
Maravita A., Husain M., Clarke K., Driver J. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39, 580–585.
Minogue J., Jones M. G. (2006). Haptics in education: Exploring an untapped sensory modality. Review of Educational Research, 76, 317–348.
Proffitt D. R., Linkenauger S. A. (in press). Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In Prinz W., Beisert M., Herwig A. (Eds.), Tutorials in action science. MIT Press.
Qian C., Al-Aidroos N., West G., Abrams R., Pratt J. (2012). The visual P2 is attenuated for attended objects near the hands. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 95–104.
Reed C. L., Betz R., Garza J. P., Roberts R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 236–245.
Reed C. L., Grubb J. D., Steele C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166–177.
Richardson D. C., Dale R., Kirkham N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413.
Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Samson D., Apperly I. A., Braithwaite J. J., Andrews B. J., Bodley Scott S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1255–1266.
Schendel K., Robertson L. C. (2004). Reaching out to see: Arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 935–943.
Schultheis H., Carlson L., Abrams R. A. (2010, August). Attention for action: Attentional modulation by the hands. Poster presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, OR.
Thomas L. E., Davoli C. C., Brockmole J. R. (in press). Interacting with objects compresses environmental representations in spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Tseng P., Bridgeman B. (2011). Improved change detection with nearby hands. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 257–269.
Vishton P. M., Stephens N. J., Nelson L. A., Morra S. E., Brunick K. L., Stevens J. A. (2007). Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science, 18, 713–719.
Weidler B. J., Abrams R. A. (2012, November). Enhanced and impaired processing of visual stimuli near the hands. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Welsh T. N., Lyons J., Weeks D. J., Anson J. G., Chua R., Mendoza J., Elliott D. (2007). Within- and between-nervous-system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 950–956.
Witt J. K., Brockmole J. R. (2012). Action alters object identification: Wielding a gun increases the bias to see guns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1159–1167.
Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479–1492.
Witt J. K., Proffitt D. R., Epstein W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.
Witt J. K., Sugovic M. (2010). Performance and ease influence perceived speed. Perception, 39, 1341–1353.
Witt J. K., Sugovic M., Taylor J. E. T. (2012). Action-specific effects in a social context: Others’ abilities influence perceived speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 715–725.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 1, 2013
Issue published: February 2013

Keywords

  1. perception
  2. attention
  3. memory
  4. hand posture
  5. tool use
  6. embodied cognition

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2013.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James R. Brockmole
University of Notre Dame
Christopher C. Davoli
University of Notre Dame
Richard A. Abrams
Washington University in St. Louis
Jessica K. Witt
Colorado State University

Notes

James R. Brockmole, Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, 127 Haggar Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Current Directions in Psychological Science.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1026

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 100 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 83

  1. Research Avenues Supporting Embodied Cognition in Learning and Instruc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Psychological proximity improves reasoning in academic aptitude tests
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  4. Does hand proximity enhance letter identification?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Does hand position affect orienting when no action is required? An ele...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Action-control mappings of interfaces in virtual reality: A study of e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Catch the star! Spatial information activates the manual motor system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Tapping with a Handheld Stick in VR: Redirection Detection Thresholds ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Is semantic processing impaired near the hands?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Tool Use Affects Spatial Perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. An auditory hand-proximity effect: The auditory Simon effect is enhanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Touching digital objects directly on multi-touch devices fosters learn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Embodied Attention: Integrating the Body and Senses to Act in the Worl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Preventing action slows down performance in perceptual judgment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Do left-handers outperform right-handers in paper-and-pencil tests of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Vision is biased near handheld, but not remotely operated, tools
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Embodied cognition in multitasking: increased hand-specific task shiel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Meditation alters representations of peripersonal space: Evidence from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. What Does Dorsal Cortex Contribute to Perception?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Using mimicking gestures to improve observational learning from instru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Near-hand effects are robust: Three OSF pre-registered replications of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Self‐generated variability in object images predicts vocabulary growth
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Change detection for real-world objects in perihand space
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Prolonged subjective duration near the hands: Effects of hand proximit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. How action performance affects object perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Hand proximity effects are fragile: a useful null result
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Dual-Tasking in the Near-Hand Space: Effects of Stimulus-Hand Proximit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Impaired conflict monitoring near the hands: Neurophysiological eviden...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Feeling but not seeing the hand: Occluded hand position reduces the ha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Immobilization does not disrupt near-hand attentional biases
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Situated and distributed cognition in artifact negotiation and trade-s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Action history influences eye movements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Engagement of the motor system in position monitoring: reduced distrac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Grounding by Attention Simulation in Peripersonal Space: Pupils Dilate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Tool use produces a size illusion revealing action-specific perceptual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Sensory Science Education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Altered Visuo-spatial Processing in the Peri-personal Space: A New Loo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Understanding the role of sensory processing in occupation: An updated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Chapter 7. Gestures highlight perceptual-motor representations in thin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Action Experience Drives Visual-Processing Biases Near the Hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  44. Visual processing is biased in peripersonal foot space
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Hand posture and cognitive control: The congruency sequence effect is ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Intentional control of visual processing benefits from referential obj...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Moving to Capture Children’s Attention: Developing a Methodology for M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Boundary Extension Is Sensitive to Hand Position in Young and Older Ad...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Public health doesn’t care what Fodor thinks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Models and Systems of Causality of Behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Designing Digital Technologies for Deeper Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Reduced object-based perception in the near-hand space
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. The behavioral urgency of objects approaching your avatar
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Editorial: Taking a hands-on approach: current perspectives on the eff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Altered visual perception near the hands: A critical review of attenti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Do you see what I see? Co-actor posture modulates visual processing in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Action capability enhances visual sensitivity in the extrapersonal spa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. The Fox and the Grapes—How Physical Constraints Affect Value Based Dec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Grasp Posture Alters Visual Processing Biases Near the Hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  65. A touchy subject: advancing the modulated visual pathways account of a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. The Potential of Embodied Cognition to Improve STEAM Instructional Dyn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Interacting hands: the role of attention for the joint Simon effect
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Under Pressure: Processing Representational Decoupling in False-Belief...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Altered attention for stimuli on the hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Pomodoro, a mobile robot platform for hand motion exercising
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Hand proximity facilitates spatial discrimination of auditory tones
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Hand proximity differentially affects visual working memory for color ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Enhanced cognitive control near the hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Knowing Where to Draw the Line: Perceptual Differences between Risk-ta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Trade-offs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Armed and attentive: Holding a weapon can bias attentional priorities ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  80. Paul Thagard: The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Continuous hand movement induces a far-hand bias in attentional priori...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Hand proximity—not arm posture—alters vision near the hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Take the matter into your own hands: A brief review of the effect of n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text