Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published online February 17, 2010

Are Dyads Really Groups?

Abstract

Social scientists who study groups disagree about whether (and to what extent) dyads ought to be included in their work. In this article, I argue that dyads are not really groups because (a) dyads are more ephemeral than groups, forming and dissolving more quickly; (b) people feel stronger (and often different) emotions in dyads than in groups; (c) dyads are simpler than groups—some group phenomena cannot occur in dyads, and those that do may operate differently there; and (d) research on dyads is carried out almost independently (by different people, applying different theories and methods, and publishing their work in different outlets) from research on groups. I also review some of the conceptual and methodological problems that can arise when dyads are mistakenly viewed as groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bakeman, R., & Beck, S. ( 1974). The size of informal groups in public. Environment & Behavior, 6, 378-390.
Bar-Tal, D. ( 1990). Group beliefs: A conception for analyzing group structure, processes, and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Barelds, D.P.H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality, trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 479-496.
Bazerman, M.H., Mannix, E.A., & Thompson, L.L. (1987). Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 195-216). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Burgess, J.W. ( 1984). Do humans show a "species-typical" group size? Age, sex, and environmental differences in the size and composition of naturally-occurring causal groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 1-57.
Cattell, R.B. ( 1948). Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality . Psychological Review, 55, 48-63.
DeDreu, C.K.W., Beersma, B., Steinel, W., & Van Kleef, G.A. (2007). The psychology of negotiation: Principles and basic processes. In A. E. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 608-629). New York: Guilford Press.
Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G.J.O. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy: A prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 942-958.
Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. ( 1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
Hackman, J.R., & Vidmar, N. ( 1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33, 37-54.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. ( 1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
James, J. ( 1951). A preliminary study of the size determinant in small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 16, 474-477.
Jourard, S.M. ( 1971). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Kanter, R.M. ( 1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 419-517.
Kelly, J.R., & Barsade, S.G. ( 2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
Knee, C.R. ( 1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360-370.
Kunda, Z. ( 1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 490-498.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 415-469). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Lewis, R.A. ( 1973). Social reaction and the formation of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 36, 409-418.
Lofland, J.L. ( 1981). Collective behavior: The elementary forms. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 413-446). New York: Basic Books.
Lott, A.J., & Lott, B.E. ( 1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
Maass, A., West, S.G., & Cialdini, R.B. (1987). Minority influence and conversion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 55-79.
Mazur, A. ( 1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups . Social Forces, 64, 377-402.
McGrath, J.E. ( 1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Inglewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Meneses, R., Ortega, R., Navarro, J., & de Quijano, S.D. (2008). Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups. Small Group Research, 39, 492-514.
Miller, C.E., & Komorita, S.S. (1986). Coalition formation in organizations: What laboratory studies do and do not tell us. In R. J. Lewicki, M. H. Bazerman, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 117-137). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Moreland, R.L. ( 1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 80-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. ( 1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. ( 1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. ( 2000). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moreland, R.L., Levine, J.M., & Wingert, M.L. ( 1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work . In J. Davis & E. Witte (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moreland, R.L., & McMinn, J.G. (1999). Gone, but not forgotten: Loyalty and betrayal among ex-members of small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1476-1486.
Moreland, R.L., & McMinn, J.G. (2004). Entitativity and social integration: Managing beliefs about the reality of groups. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 419-437). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
O’Dell, J.W. ( 1968). Group size and emotional interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 75-78.
Omarzu, J. ( 2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 174-185.
Ridgeway, C., & Diekema, D. ( 1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93.
Scherer, K.R., Wallbott, H.G., Matsumoto, D., & Kudoh, T. ( 1988). Emotional experience in cultural context: A comparison between Europe, Japan, and the United States. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Facets of emotion: Recent research (pp. 5-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schriesheim, C.A., Castro, S.L., & Cogliser, C.C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113.
Smith, E.R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. ( 1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
Solano, C.H., & Dunham, M. ( 1985). Two’s company: Self-disclosure and reciprocity in triads versus dyads. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 183-187.
Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M.S. ( 1987). Bereavement and health: The psychological and physical consequences of partner loss. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, R.B., DeSoto, C.B., & Lieb, R. ( 1979). Sharing secrets: Disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 1196-1203.
Tsui, A.S., Egan, T.D., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
Turner, J.C. ( 1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social-cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M. ( 1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
Vuchinich, S., Emery, R.E., & Cassidy, J. ( 1988). Family members as third parties in dyadic family conflict: Strategies, alliances, and outcomes. Child Development, 59, 1293-1302.
Wegner, D.M. ( 1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Weingart, L.R., Brett, J.M., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P.L. ( 2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 994-1010.
Williams, K.D. ( 2002). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford Press.
Wolff, K. ( 1964). The sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 17, 2010
Issue published: April 2010

Keywords

  1. dyads
  2. size
  3. emotions

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2010.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard L. Moreland
University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA, [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Small Group Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1238

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 137 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 140

  1. The effect of competition on children's merit‐based resource allocatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Modelling the “transactive memory system” in multimodal multiparty int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Chasing Deliberation in the Social Science Classroom. A Study of Delib...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Testing the boundaries of the model of pro-group intent: Does group in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Using interbrain synchrony to study teamwork: a systematic review and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Les dyades, des équipes entrepreneuriales comme les autres ?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Differences in Sociodemographic Characteristics and Treatment Refusal ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The key features of workplace meetings: Conceptualizing the why, how, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. One-on-one meetings between managers and direct reports: A new opportu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A Multimodal Social Signal Processing Approach to Team Interactions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Improvised herding: Mapping biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie gro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Investigating the Effects of Perceived Teammate Artificiality on Human...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The forgotten teammate: Considering the labor perspective in human-aut...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Non-Invasive Measurement of Trust in Group Interactions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Peeling Away the Layers of Workplace Gossip: A Framework, Review, and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Epistemic motivation facilitates advice seeking and utilization by gro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Detecting ulterior motives from verbal cues in group deliberations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Knowledge sharing in temporary teams: Exploring the use of 3D printing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Confidence Is Key: Collective Efficacy, Team Processes, and Team Effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. The CANDOR corpus: Insights from a large multimodal dataset of natural...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Digging into “Zoom Fatigue”: A Qualitative Exploration of Remote Work ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. A Review of Using Wearable Technology to Assess Team Functioning and P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Physiological Synchrony Predict Task Performance and Negative Emotiona...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Ecological validity of social defeat stressors in mouse models of vuln...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Bringing the cognitive revolution forward: What can team cognition con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Embracing Complexity: A Review of Negotiation Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Knowledge Diversity and Venture Growth: The Contingent Effects of Earl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. The Neuroscience of Team Dynamics: Exploring Neurophysiological Measur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A Study on the Relationship between the Dynamic Behaviors of the Leade...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. I See You: Examining the Role of Spatial Information in Human-Agent Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Let's move on! How pair collaboration activates resilience toward inno...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Physiological Compliance during a Three Member Collaborative Computer ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Self-organization in online collaborative work settings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Beyond Reciprocity: Forgiveness, Generosity, and Punishment in Continu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Crowdsourcing Team Formation With Worker-Centered Modeling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. The relationship between collaborative problem solving behaviors and s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. The role of social context in the association between leisure activiti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. An integrative multilevel review of thriving at work: Assessing progre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Group Dynamics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Group Size and Peer Learning: Peer Discussions in Different Group Size...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Defining Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Leader status behaviors and team creativity: The role of collective in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Processes of knowledge recombination in two-person teams: resource poo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Pairs as pivots of innovation: how collaborative sensemaking benefits ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Elaborating or Aggregating? The Joint Effects of Group Decision-Making...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Team Combat Identification: Effects of Gender, Spatial Visualization, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  49. Specialty Grand Challenge Article- Social Neuroergonomics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Conversation in small groups: Speaking and listening strategies depend...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Robot-Assisted Tower Construction—A Method to Study the Impact of a Ro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Offence characteristics: a comparison of lone, duo, and 3+ perpetrator...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Dominance in Groups: How Dyadic Power Theory Can Apply to Group Discus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Behavioral Indicators of Dominance in an Adversarial Group Negotiation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Perf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Group Communication Needs No Consistent Transcript Distribution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. The WoNoWa Dataset
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Triadic balance in the brain: Seeking brain evidence for Heider’s stru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. The Influence of Goal Commitment and Partner Status on Team Assignment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  60. Across the Great Divides: Gender Dynamics Influence How Intercultural ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Measuring team trust: A critical and meta‐analytical review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. The Effects of LMX Differentiation on Team Performance: Investigating ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Are Meetings Really Just Another Stressor? The Relevance of Team Meeti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. “There were Spooks in the Park”: Children's reminiscing with parents a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. The “fixed” pie perception and strategy in dyadic versus multiparty ne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. High-stakes innovation: When collaboration in teams enhances (or under...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. The many minds problem: disclosure in dyadic versus group conversation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Towards a generalized competency model of collaborative problem solvin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Are single people a stigmatized ‘group’? Evidence from examinations of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Where You End and I Begin: Understanding Intimate Co-creation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Interacción diádica en baile deportivo: características psicológicas
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Interacción diádica en baile deportivo: características psicológicas
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Beyond Dyadic Coordination: Multimodal Behavioral Irregularity in Tria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. How social challenges affect children’s regulation and assignment qual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. The conceptualization of gangs: Changing the focus
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Attributional consensus: The importance of agreement over causes for t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Dynamics of Visual Attention in Multiparty Collaborative Problem Solvi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Are single people a stigmatized 'group'? Evidence from examinations of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. The Lasting Benefits of Teams: Tie Vitality After Teams Disband
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Attachment to groups: Relationships with group esteem, self‐esteem, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Conceptual Modeling of Team Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Moving Beyond the Dyad: Broadening Our Understanding of Family Conflic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Free to move or trapped in your group: Mathematical modeling of inform...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy delivered in a dyad after a severe t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Towards a model of nonverbal leadership in unstructured joint physical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Team Turnover and Task Conflict: A Longitudinal Study on the Moderatin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Family members' strategies as allies during naturalistic polyadic fami...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Friends With Performance Benefits: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  90. Antecedents and outcomes of information privacy concerns in a peer con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. New Frontiers in Analyzing Dynamic Group Interactions: Bridging Social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  92. Pushing Interdisciplinary in the Study of Groups and Teams
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Reframing Durkheim: How Task Specialization Versus Task Overlap Affect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Optimal group decision: A matter of confidence calibration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Narratives with Robots: The Impact of Interaction Context and Individu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Protective factors and risk factors...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Planning and Performance in Small Groups: Collective Implementation In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Effects of a Dyad's Cultural Intelligence on Global Virtual Collaborat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Pairwise Communication for Innovation at Work
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. What Does it Take to Break the Silence in Teams: Authentic Leadership ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. When Task Conflict Becomes Personal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  103. When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Team Adaptiveness in Dynamic Contexts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. What Is Meant By The Term Group Mentoring?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Procedural justice in children: Preschoolers accept unequal resource d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. WHEN PAIRING REDUCES SCARING: THE EFFECT OF DYADIC IDEATION ON EVALUAT...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Affiliative Subgroups in Preschool Classrooms: Integrating Constructs ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Analyzing the effects of group members’ characteristics: A guide to th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Transfer: a Meta-Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. How should we divide the pie? Equity distribution and its impact on en...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. A Review and Critique of Partner Effect Research in Small Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Heterogeneity Within Multiple Perpetrator Rapes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  116. The negative effects of delays in information exchange: Looking at wor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. The Role of Simmelian Friendship Ties on Retaliation within Triads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Group cohesion and adherence in unstructured exercise groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. With Whom and Where You Play: Preschoolers' Social Context Predicts Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Innovation and Effectiveness of Co-Founded Ventures: A Process Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. The Design and Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Predicting Group Outcomes from Brief Exposures
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. The Name-Letter-Effect in Groups: Sharing Initials with Group Members ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. Contagious leaders and followers: Exploring multi-stage mood contagion...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Beyond 12 Angry Men: Thin-Slicing Film to Illustrate Group Dynamics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Perceived Diversity and Team Functioning...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. Interaction in Small Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. Performance effects of cognitive heterogeneity in dual leadership stru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Introducing an intrateam longitudinal approach to the study of team pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Risk‐Taking Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Individuals and Dyad...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Conformity on the Internet – The role of task difficulty and gender di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the diff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model to Study the Effects of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Does Excluding Some Groups From Research Designs Improve Statistical P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. Transpersonal Efficacy: How Efficacy Perceptions of Single Others Infl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. When Diversity in Training Improves Dyadic Problem Solving
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Effects of Cooperative Versus Individual Study on Learning and Motivat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Dyads Can Be Groups (and Often Are)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub