Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published online February 18, 2010

Dyads Can Be Groups (and Often Are)

Abstract

Moreland eloquently argues for excluding dyads from group process research and theory. Although dyads can have properties that do not lend themselves to certain group process research (e.g., coalition formation) and have properties that can go beyond typical group processes (e.g., intimate relations and love), in most instances dyads are groups of two and operate under the same principles and theories that explain group processes for groups of three and larger. In this article, the author presents research and theory that support the inclusion of dyads as groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Cottrell, N.B. ( 1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Jamieson, J.P., & Harkins, S.G. ( 2007). Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 544-564.
Kamphoff, C.S., Gill, D.L., & Huddleston, S. (2005). Jealousy in sport: Exploring jealousy’s relation to cohesion. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 290-305.
Kelly, J.R., & Barsade, S.G. ( 2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
Latané, B. ( 1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. ( 1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
Olekalns, M., & Smith, P.L. ( 2005). Moments in time: Metacognition, trust, and outcomes in dyadic negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1696-1707.
Moreland, R.L. ( 2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41, 251-267.
Moreland, R.L., Hogg, M.A., & Hains, S.C. ( 1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
Sanders, G.S., Baron, R.S., & Moore, D.O. ( 1978). Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 291-303.
Williams, K.D. ( 2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 41 (pp. 279-314). NY: Academic Press.
Williams, K.D., Harkins, S.G., & Karau, S.J. ( 2003). Social performance. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 328-346). London: Sage.
Zajonc, R.B. ( 1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
Zajonc, R.B. ( 1980). Compresence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 18, 2010
Issue published: April 2010

Keywords

  1. dyads
  2. social facilitation/inhibition
  3. social loafing
  4. ostracism
  5. group

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2010.

Authors

Affiliations

Kipling D. Williams
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Small Group Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 746

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 73 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 78

  1. Testing the boundaries of the model of pro-group intent: Does group in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. From peacetime to war: a path analysis of the factors that predict per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Differences in Sociodemographic Characteristics and Treatment Refusal ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Investigating the Effects of Perceived Teammate Artificiality on Human...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. AI in human teams: effects on technology use, members’ interactions, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Epistemic motivation facilitates advice seeking and utilization by gro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Detecting ulterior motives from verbal cues in group deliberations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Confidence Is Key: Collective Efficacy, Team Processes, and Team Effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  10. Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Two’s Company, Three’s a Crowd: The Interplay between Collective versu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The Neuroscience of Team Dynamics: Exploring Neurophysiological Measur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. I See You: Examining the Role of Spatial Information in Human-Agent Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Self-organization in online collaborative work settings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Thinking outside the box helps build social connections: The role of c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Group Size and Peer Learning: Peer Discussions in Different Group Size...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Defining Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Processes of knowledge recombination in two-person teams: resource poo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Elaborating or Aggregating? The Joint Effects of Group Decision-Making...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Team Combat Identification: Effects of Gender, Spatial Visualization, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  22. Conversation in small groups: Speaking and listening strategies depend...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Robot-Assisted Tower Construction—A Method to Study the Impact of a Ro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Dominance in Groups: How Dyadic Power Theory Can Apply to Group Discus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Behavioral Indicators of Dominance in an Adversarial Group Negotiation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Group Communication Needs No Consistent Transcript Distribution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Robots in Groups and Teams
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Across the Great Divides: Gender Dynamics Influence How Intercultural ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Groupness: Providing a Roadmap for an Emerging Construct in Physical A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Psychology of Group Dynamics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. High-stakes innovation: When collaboration in teams enhances (or under...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Five (plus or minus one): The point at which an assemblage of individu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Are single people a stigmatized ‘group’? Evidence from examinations of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Where You End and I Begin: Understanding Intimate Co-creation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Beyond Dyadic Coordination: Multimodal Behavioral Irregularity in Tria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. The conceptualization of gangs: Changing the focus
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Attributional consensus: The importance of agreement over causes for t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Are single people a stigmatized 'group'? Evidence from examinations of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Attachment to groups: Relationships with group esteem, self‐esteem, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Pair interactions in online assessments of collaborative problem solvi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Attack of the green-eyed monster: a review of jealousy and envy in sma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Antecedents of competitive group formation intention in business educa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy delivered in a dyad after a severe t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. When Teams Fail to Self-Regulate: Predictors and Outcomes of Team Proc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. How Interdependence in Team Task Structure Impacts Evaluations of Memb...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Friends With Performance Benefits: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  48. Human-Agent Interruptions: A Systems Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Reframing Durkheim: How Task Specialization Versus Task Overlap Affect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Optimal group decision: A matter of confidence calibration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. It Depends on the Partner: Person-Related Sources of Efficacy Beliefs ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Planning and Performance in Small Groups: Collective Implementation In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  55. Team Adaptiveness in Dynamic Contexts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Observations on knowledge transfer of professional software developers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Team members’ emotional displays as indicators of team functioning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. What Is Meant By The Term Group Mentoring?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Beyond Reliance and Compliance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Affiliative Subgroups in Preschool Classrooms: Integrating Constructs ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Transfer: a Meta-Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Does cognitive style diversity affect performance in dyadic student te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. A Review and Critique of Partner Effect Research in Small Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Heterogeneity Within Multiple Perpetrator Rapes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  68. Group cohesion and adherence in unstructured exercise groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Working Harder or Hardly Working? Posting Performance Eliminates Socia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Innovation and Effectiveness of Co-Founded Ventures: A Process Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Interaction in Small Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Performance effects of cognitive heterogeneity in dual leadership stru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Risk‐Taking Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Individuals and Dyad...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Reliability Estimates for Multilevel Designs in Group Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. When Diversity in Training Improves Dyadic Problem Solving
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Social ecology of similarity...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Effects of Cooperative Versus Individual Study on Learning and Motivat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub