Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 23, 2013

Physiological Linkage of Dyadic Gaming Experience

Abstract

Dyadic gaming experience was studied in a psychophysiological experiment where conflict structure and the presence of an artificial intelligence (AI) agent in a turn-based game were varied in four different conditions. Electrocardiographic and electrodermal activity signals of 41 same-gender dyads were recorded to study joint changes in their physiological signals. A strong physiological linkage was found within dyads in all conditions, but the linkage scores did not differentiate between conflict modes. The only significant difference in linkage between conditions was an increase when the AI agents were not present. In addition, linkage was associated with different self-report scales assessing social presence. These results suggest that social presence and physiological linkage within dyads are higher when dyads can focus on each others’ actions without distractions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Barsade S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675.
Barsalou L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
Benedek M., Kaernbach C. (2010). Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution. Psychophysiology, 47, 647-658.
Biocca F., Harms C. (2003). Guide to the Networked Minds Social Presence Inventory v. 1.2: Measures of co-presence, social presence, subjective symmetry, and intersubjective symmetry. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
Brownley K., Hurwitz B., Schneiderman N. (2000). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G., Berntson G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 224-263). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chanel G., Kivikangas J. M., Ravaja N. (2012). Physiological compliance for social gaming analysis: Cooperative versus competitive play. Interacting With Computers, 24, 306-316.
Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Dawson M. E., Schell A. M., Filion D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G., Berntson G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200-223). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
de Carvalho J., da Rocha A., de Oliveira Nascimento F., Neto J., Junqueira L. J. (2002). Development of a Matlab software for analysis of heart rate variability. In Yuan B., Tang X. (Eds.), 6th International Conference on Signal Processing (pp. 1488-1491). Beijing, China: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., People’s Posts & Telecommunications Publishing House.
de Kort Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn W. A. (2008). People, places, and play: Player experience in a socio-spatial context. Computers in Entertainment, 6(2). Article 18.
de Kort Y. A. W., Ijsselsteijn W. A., Poels K. (2007). Digital games as social presence technology: Development of the Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ). In Moreno L. (Ed.), Presence 2007 conference (pp. 195-203). Starlab Barcelona S.L., Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.temple.edu/ispr/prev_conferences/proceedings/2007/de%20Kort,%20IJsselsteijn,%20and%20Poels.pdf
Dimberg U., Öhman A. (1996). Behold the wrath: Psychophysiological responses to facial stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 149-182.
Ekman I., Chanel G., Järvelä S., Kivikangas J. M., Salminen M., Ravaja N. (2012). Social interaction in games: Measuring physiological linkage and social presence. Simulation & Gaming, 43, 321-338.
Hatfield E., Cacioppo J. T., Rapson R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 96-100.
Henning R., Boucsein W., Gil M. C. (2001). Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 221-232.
Kallio K. P., Mäyrä F., Kaipainen K. (2011). At least nine ways to play: Approaching game mentalities. Games and Culture, 6, 327-353.
Kätsyri J., Hari R., Ravaja N., Nummenmaa L. (2012). The opponent matters: Elevated fMRI reward responses to winning against a human versus a computer opponent during interactive video game playing. Cerebral Cortex. Advance online publication.
Kenny D. A., Kashy D., Cook W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kivikangas J. M., Chanel G., Cowley B., Ekman I., Salminen M., Järvelä S., Ravaja N. (2011). A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 3, 181-199.
Kivikangas J. M., Kätsyri J., Järvelä S., Ravaja N. (2013). Gender differences in emotional responses to competitive and cooperative game play. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kruschke J. K. (2010). What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 293-300.
Lee K. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50.
Levenson R. W., Gottman J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587-597.
Levenson R. W., Ruef A. M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234-246.
Levenson R. W., Ruef A. M. (1997). Physiological aspects of emotional knowledge and rapport. In Ickes W. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 44-72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lim S., Reeves B. (2010). Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 57-68.
Mahon B. Z., Caramazza A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59-70.
Mandryk R. L. (2008). Physiological measures for game evaluation. In Isbister K., Schaffer N. (Eds.), Game usability: Advancing the player experience (pp. 207-235). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Mandryk R. L., Inkpen K. M., Calvert T. W. (2006). Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technology. Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 141-158.
Mauss I. B., Robinson M. D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 209-237.
McGee K., Merritt T., Ong C. (2011). What we have here is a failure of companionship. In Paris C., Colineau N., Farrell V., Farrell G., Huang W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on—OzCHI ’11 (pp. 198-201). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Mehrabian A. (1996). Manual for the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES). Available from Albert Mehrabian, 1130 Alta Mesa Road, Monterey, CA 93940.
Nass C., Moon Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
Niedenthal P. M., Barsalou L. W., Winkielman P., Krauth-Gruber S., Ric F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.
Niedenthal P. M., Brauer M., Halberstadt J. B., Innes-Ker Å. H. (2001). When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 853-864.
Paulhus D. L., Vazire S. (2008). The self-report method. In Robins R., Fraley R., Krueger R. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Porges S. W., Bohrer R. E., Cheung M. N., Drasgow F., McCabe P. M., Keren G. (1980). New time-series statistic for detecting rhythmic co-occurrence in the frequency domain: The weighted coherence and its application to psychophysiological research. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 580-587.
Ravaja N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193-235.
Ravaja N., Saari T., Turpeinen M., Laarni J., Salminen M., Kivikangas M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 381-392.
Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
Robinson M. D., Clore G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934-960.
Salen K., Zimmerman E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sherry J. L., Lucas K., Greenberg B. S., Lachlan K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In Vorderer P., Bryant J. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Spapé M. M., Kivikangas J. M., Järvelä S., Kosunen I., Jacucci G., Ravaja N. (2013). Keeping your opponents close: Social context affects EEG and fEMG linkage in a turn-based computer game. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78795.
Stenros J., Paavilainen J., Mäyrä F. (2011). Social interaction in games. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 342-358.
Tarvainen M. P., Ranta-aho P. O., Karjalainen P. A. (2002). An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49, 172-175.

Biographies

Simo Järvelä, BBA, has a background in cognitive science and human resources management. His current research interests include physiological linkage, embodied cognition, psychophysiology, media experience, games in various forms, and social interaction.
J. Matias Kivikangas (MA in psychology, University of Helsinki, 2006) is a researcher at EMOID group and a graduate student at University of Helsinki. His dissertation is focused on the psychophysiology of the (local) social game experiences: how the different aspects of social interaction shape the personal experience of playing digital games.
Jari Kätsyri (PhD, Cognitive Science, Helsinki University of Technology) is a postdoctoral researcher at Aalto University. He is interested in studying emotions in both human-human and human-computer interactions. His recently finished projects include studies utilizing simple video games in functional MRI brain imaging settings.
Niklas Ravaja, PhD, is a professor at the Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, and director of research at the Department of Information and Service Economy, Aalto School of Business. His areas of research interest and expertise include the psychophysiology of attention, emotion, and temperament and media psychology. He is an associate editor of Journal of Media Psychology.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 23, 2013
Issue published: February 2014

Keywords

  1. AI agents
  2. digital games
  3. gaming experience
  4. physiological linkage
  5. psychophysiology

Rights and permissions

© 2013 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Simo Järvelä
Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
J. Matias Kivikangas
Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
Jari Kätsyri
Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
Niklas Ravaja
Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
University of Helsinki, Finland

Notes

Simo Järvelä, Aalto School of Business, Department of Information and Service Economy, Aalto University, P.O. Box 21220, Helsinki, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Simulation & Gaming.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 801

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 50

  1. Two’s company: Biobehavioral research with dyads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Exploring objective measures for assessing team performance in healthc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Group Synchrony for Emotion Recognition Using Physiological Signals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A Computational Approach to Examining Team Coordination Breakdowns Dur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Demonstrating Virtual Teamwork with Synchrobots: A Robot-Mediated Appr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Physiological Synchrony Predict Task Performance and Negative Emotiona...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Costs of caring: Synchrony in salivary alpha amylase, heart rate, and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Multimodal hyperscanning reveals that synchrony of body and mind are d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Cardiac Arrest: Evaluating the Role of Biosignals in Gameplay Strategi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Cognitive processing of a common stimulus synchronizes brains, hearts,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The pivotal role of monitoring for collaborative problem solving seen ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. ENGAGE-DEM: A Model of Engagement of People With Dementia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. An Exploratory Study of Physiological Linkage Among Strangers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Leveraging Affective Friction to Improve Online Creative Collaboration...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Adolescent girls’ intrapersonal and interpersonal parasympathetic regu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. What If We Look at the Body? An Embodied Perspective of Collaborative ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. How Can High-Frequency Sensors Capture Collaboration? A Review of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. AI can fool us humans, but not at the psycho-physiological level: a hy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. NEUROERGONOMICS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Automated affect classification and task difficulty adaptation in a co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Interpersonal autonomic nervous system synchrony and its association t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Understanding the “social” nature of digital games
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. “I feel you”: Greater linkage between friends’ physiological responses...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Team Physiological Dynamics: A Critical Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  26. Brain and motor synchrony in children and adolescents with ASD—a fNIRS...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Physiological synchrony is associated with cooperative success in real...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Physiological Synchrony, Stress and Communication of Paramedic Trainee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Physiological Synchrony Revealed by Delayed Coincidence Count: Applica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Unpacking the relationship between existing and new measures of physio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Are we together or not? The temporal interplay of monitoring, physiolo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Examining shared monitoring in collaborative learning: A case of a rec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Intergenerational shared action games for promoting empathy between Ja...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Using Physiological Linkage for Patient State Assessment In a Competit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Impact of humor‐related communication elements in natural dyadic inter...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Sympathetic arousal commonalities and arousal contagion during collabo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Microenvironmental Influences on Team Performance in Cancer Care
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Monitoring in collaborative learning: Co-occurrence of observed behavi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. May the Best Joint-Actions Win: Physiological Linkage During Competiti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Electrodermal Activity, Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia, and Heart Rate V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. On Measuring and Modeling Physiological Synchrony in Dyads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Using Physiological Synchrony as an Indicator of Collaboration Quality...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  44. On the mechanical, cognitive and sociable facets of human compliance a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Intragroup Emotions: Physiological Linkage and Social Presence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Investigating collaborative learning success with physiological coupli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Quantifying EDA synchrony through joint sparse representation: A case-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Cooperation and Conflict: Taxonomy of References 2010 to 2015
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Does it matter with whom you slay? The effects of competition, coopera...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Gender Differences in Emotional Responses to Cooperative and Competiti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

NASAGA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

NASAGA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text