This study explicated the theory underpinning the Human Ecology Practicum Program offered in the Department of Human Ecology at the University of Alberta. The program has operated for 40 years but never been formally evaluated. Using a document analysis, focus group and individual interviews, and a stakeholder working group, we explored stakeholder perspectives on the purpose, design, and logic of the program. Findings indicated a common understanding among stakeholders about the fundamental purpose and design of the program, and about the mechanisms by which design features lead to program goals. Findings were used to develop the theory of the Human Ecology Practicum Program. In addition to providing a case example of practicum program theory development, our study demonstrates the value of involving stakeholders in theory development and supports the articulation of program theory as part of course planning and evaluation within postsecondary education programs.

Baird, B.N. (2008). The internship, practicum, and field placement handbook: A guide for the helping professions. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Baldwin, C., Persing, J., Magnuson, D. (2004). The role of theory, research, and evaluation in adventure education. The Journal of Experiential Education, 26(3), 167-183.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. In Bickman, L. (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (pp. 5-17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Breunig, M. (2005). Turning experiential education and critical pedagogy theory into praxis. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 106-122.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Brown, J., Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified theory of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40-57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carver, R. (1996). Theory for practice: A framework for thinking about experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 19(1), 8-13.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chen, H. T. (2005). Evaluating outcomes: Efficacy evaluation versus effectiveness evaluation. Practical program evaluation. Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness (pp. 195-229). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chickering, A. W. (1977). Experience and learning: An introduction to experiential learning. Rochelle, NY: Change Management Press.
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
Google Scholar
Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program theory-driven evaluation science: Strategies and applications. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Drolet, J., Clark, N., Allen, H. (2012). Shifting sites of practice: Field education in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Canada.
Google Scholar
Fenwick, T. J. (2003). Learning through experience: Troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Google Scholar
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learn, 29, 273-297.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Giles, D. E. (1990). Dewey’s theory of experience: Implications for service-learning. In Kendall, J. C. (Ed.), Combining service and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 257-260). Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education.
Google Scholar
Gugiu, C. P., Rodriguez-Campos, L. (2007). Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 339-350.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Katula, R., Threnhauser, E. (1999). Experiential education in the undergraduate curriculum. Communication Education, 48(3), 238-255.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
McKenzie, M. (2000). How are adventure education program outcomes achieved? A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 5(1), 19-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Myers, I. B. (1980). Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Palo-Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
Google Scholar
Quay, J. (2003). Experience and participation: Relating theories of learning. The Journal of Experiential Education, 26(2), 105-116.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Rogers, P. J., Williams, B. (2006). Evaluation for practice improvement and organizational learning. In Shaw, I. F., Greene, J. C., Mark, M. M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 76-97). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rossi, P., Freeman, H., Lipsey, M. (1999). Expressing and assessing program theory. Evaluation: A systematic approach (6th ed., pp. 155-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Ryan, G., Toohey, S., Hughes, C. (1996). The purpose, value and structure of the practicum in higher education. Higher Education, 31, 355-377.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Simon, E. (1989). Field practice survey results. In Tower, C. (Ed.), Field work in human services (Monograph 6). Alexandria, VA: Council for Standards in Human Service Education. Available from www.cshse.org/publications.html
Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., Grant, A. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organizational Science, 16(5), 537-549.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sweitzer, H., King, M. (2009). The successful internship: Personal, professional, and civic development. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Clarifying the evaluation request and responsibilities. Program evaluation, Alternative approaches and practical guideline (2nd ed., pp. 191-214). New York, NY: Longman.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JEE-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0