![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Background: Family Life Education Methodology (FLEM) is an integral component of the family science collegiate curriculum. Given the range of topics and that material is not immediately interesting to students, teaching FLE courses is consistently reported as difficult. Purpose: The goal of this study is to evaluate an experiential learning approach to FLEM that addresses these pedagogical issues by expanding on the low, medium, and high dosage projects as proposed by Vaterlaus and Asay. Methodology/Approach: This approach was implemented with four FLEM classes in a midsize university (N = 120). Students completed a low, medium, and high dosage project throughout each course, and completed written evaluations after each project, which were analyzed using qualitative analysis. Findings/Conclusions: Students reported multiple benefits for each project. The low dosage project was associated with learning what FLEM is, finding, and building on passions. The medium dosage project was associated with tangible and self-learning. The high dosage project was associated with outside learning and making a difference in the community. Implications: The proposed approach utilized multiple opportunities for experiential learning that appear beneficial for student learning. Replication is needed in other collegiate contexts to validate the approach.
References
|
Bergsteiner, H., Avery, G. C., Neumann, R. (2010). Kolb’s experiential learning model: critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32, 29-46. doi:10.1080/01580370903534355 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Darling, C. A., Cassidy, D. (2014). Family life education: Working with families across the lifespan (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Darling, C. A., Fleming, W. M., Cassidy, D. (2009). Professionalization of family life education: Defining the field. Family Relations, 58, 330-345. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00556.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Duncan, S. F., Goddard, H. W. (2011). Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Duncan, S. F., Goddard, H. W. (2016). Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Hawk, T. F., Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences: Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hawkins, A. J., Carroll, J. S., Doherty, W. J., Willoughby, B. (2004). A comprehensive framework for marriage education. Family Relations, 53, 547-558. doi:10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00064.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Healey, M., Jenkins, A. (2007). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99, 185-195. doi:10.1080/00221340008978967 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Langlais, M. R. (2016). Accommodating different learning styles using YouTube: An approach to helping students understand ecological systems theory. Family Science Review, 21, 1-8. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Langlais, M. R., Asay, S., Vaterlaus, J. M., Walker, A. (2017). “Where are all the real men?”: A qualitative examination of male enrollment in family science courses. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 46, 57-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 323-339. doi:10.1177/0013164409344507 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19, 54-72. doi:10.1080/026013700293458 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Myers-Walls, J. A., Ballard, S. M., Darling, C. A., Myers-Bowman, K. S. (2011). Reconceptualizing the domain and boundaries of family life education. Family Relations, 60, 357-372. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00659.x Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
National Council on Family Relations . (2016). What is family science. Retrieved from https://www.ncfr.org/about/what-family-science Google Scholar | |
|
Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127-135. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.018 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Vaterlaus, J. M., Asay, S. (2016). Family life education methodology: An evaluation of a university family life education course. Family Science Review, 21, 135-159. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Willingham, D. T. (2005). Do visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners need visual, auditory, and kinesthetic instruction? American Educator. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/newspubs/periodicals/ae/summer2005/willingham.cfm Google Scholar | |
|
Works, H. L. (2016). Experiential learning defined: What is experiential learning? The University of Texas at Austin Innovation Center. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/strategies/overview/experiential-learning Google Scholar |
