Abstract
Background: In a digital age, service-learning partner organizations can expand beyond geographical locations accessible to the students. Particularly within fields digitizing archival sources, including art history, many learning outcomes achieved in traditional on-site service-learning programs can also result from remote access to staff and materials at non-local partner organizations. Purpose: This study analyzed the impact of a remote service-learning project between an upper division contemporary art history course at a regional university in Ohio and the Archives of American Art in Washington, D.C. Methodology/Approach: Over 3 consecutive years, the students used digitized visual and audio archival materials to edit transcripts of oral histories for web publication. At the conclusion of the project, the students conducted focus group interviews to analyze their perceptions of learning outcomes. Findings/Conclusions: Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts yielded four primary themes in the data: disciplinary understanding, transferrable skill development, critical decision making, and emotional knowledge. Implications: Remote service-learning can facilitate many of the same learning outcomes as on-site experiences.
|
Alexander, J. D. (2014). Disrupting a disruption or live everything. In Crabill, S. L., Butin, D. (Eds.), Community engagement 2.0? Dialogues on the future of the civic in the disrupted university (pp. 98-104). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
|
Barry, M. (2016). Avoiding fluff: Crafting meaningful reflection activities for service-learning students. In Nutefall, J. E. (Ed.), Service-learning, information literacy, and libraries (pp. 39-50). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. Google Scholar | |
|
Belanger, E. (2012). Public history and liberal learning: Making the case for the undergraduate practicum experience. The Public Historian, 34(4), 30-51. doi:10.1525/tph.2012.34.4.30 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Butin, D. (2006). The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 29, 473-498. doi:10.1353/rhe.2006.0025 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Butin, D. (2010). Service Learning in Theory and Practice: The Future of Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Butin, D. (2014). Provocation: On the future of the civic in the disrupted university. In Crabill, S. L., Butin, D. (Eds.), Community engagement 2.0? Dialogues on the future of the civic in the disrupted university (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cempellin, L. (2012). A service-learning project: Linking an art museum, honors students, and the visual arts. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 12, 78-94. Google Scholar | |
|
Chandra, A., Cempellin, L., Chiem, K., Dardashti, A. L., Dalal, R., Kenney, E., . . . Elkins, J. P. (2016). Looking beyond the canon: Localized and globalized perspectives in art history pedagogy. Art History Pedagogy & Practice, 1(1). Retrieved from https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ahpp/vol1/iss1/2 Google Scholar | |
|
Ching, S. H. (2018). Turning a service-learning experience into a model of student engagement: The Lighthouse Heritage Research Connections (LHRC) project in Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44, 196-206. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.007 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Davis, C. (2016). Focus groups: Applying communication theory through design, facilitation, and analysis. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Dorfsman, M. I., Horenczyk, G. (2018). Educational approaches and contexts in the development of a heritage museum. Journal of Experiential Education, 41, 170-186. doi:10.1177/1053825917740155 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Eastmond, J. N., Legler, N. (2010). Service-learning in online education: Opportunities to promote meaning and harness student energy. Distance Learning, 7(3), 1-8. Google Scholar | |
|
Erekson, K. A. (2011). From archive to awards ceremony: An approach for engaging students in historical research. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10, 388-400. doi:10.1177/1474022211408798 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Eyler, J., Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Eyler, J., Giles, D. E. (2002). Beyond surveys: Using the problem solving interview to assess the impact of service-learning on understanding and critical thinking. In Furco, A., Billig, S. H. (Eds.), Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 147-160). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Google Scholar | |
|
Hinck, A. (2014). Serving online communities: Service-learning, internet studies, and online education. In Crabill, S. L., Butin, D. (Eds.), Community engagement 2.0? Dialogues on the future of the civic in the disrupted university (pp. 26-40). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Jacoby, B., Howard, J. (2014). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G. (2013). Focus groups: From structured interviews to collective conversations. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kott, K. (2016). Service-learning in academic libraries in the united states. In Nutefall, J. E. (Ed.), Service-learning, information literacy, and libraries (pp. 1-20). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. Google Scholar | |
|
Long, C. (2011). Developing and implementing a master of archival studies program: A collaborative effort of a state university, a state archives, and the national archives and records administration. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 52, 110-121. Google Scholar | |
|
McGorry, S. Y. (2012). No significant difference in service-learning online. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 45-54. Google Scholar | |
|
McLellan, M. (1998). Case studies in oral history and community learning. The Oral History Review, 25, 81-112. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mosley, P. (2015). Hybrid ii: A model design for web development. In Strait, J., Nordyke, K. J. (Eds.), EService-learning: Creating experiential learning and civic engagement through online and hybrid courses (pp. 89-104). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Google Scholar | |
|
Nutefall, J. E. (2009). The relationship between service-learning and research. Public Services Quarterly, 5, 250-261. doi:10.1080/15228950903199271 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nystrom, E. (2002). Remembrance of things past: Service-learning opportunities in U.S. history. The Oral History Review, 29(2), 61-68. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Olson, K., Brinkmann, S. (2011). Essentials of qualitative interviewing. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Pearce, J. M. (2009). Appropedia as a tool for service-learning in sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3, 45-53. doi:10.1177/097340820900300112 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Poindexter, S., Arnold, P., Osterhout, C. (2008). Service-learning from a distance: Partnering multiple universities and local governments in a large scale initiative. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 15, 56-67. Google Scholar | |
|
Ridge, M. (Ed.). (2014). Crowdsourcing our cultural heritage. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Shifrin, S. (2011). Building community to engage community: The college museum as a site of civic engagement. Perspectives on History, 49(9). Retrieved from https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/december-2011/building-community-to-engage-community Google Scholar | |
|
Soria, K. M., Weiner, B. (2013). A “virtual fieldtrip”: Service-learning in distance education technical writing courses. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 43, 181-200. doi:10.2190/TW.43.2.e Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Stolley, K. S., Collins, T., Clark, P., Hotaling, D., Takacs, R. (2017). Taking the learning from service learning into the postcollege world. Journal of Applied Social Science, 11, 109-126. doi:10.1177/1936724417722579 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Vetter, M. A. (2014). Archive 2.0: What composition students and academic libraries can gain from digital-collaborative pedagogies. Composition Studies, 42, 35-53. Google Scholar | |
|
Waldner, L. S. (2015). eService-learning: Breaking through the barrier. In Strait, J., Nordyke, K. J. (Eds.), EService-learning: Creating experiential learning and civic engagement through online and hybrid courses (pp. 20-39). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Google Scholar | |
|
Waldner, L. S., McGorry, S. Y., Widener, M. C. (2012). E-service-learning: The evolution of service-learning to engage a growing online student population. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16, 123-150. Google Scholar | |
|
Wilson, J. C. (2011). Service-learning and the development of empathy in us college students. Education + Training, 53, 207-217. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Yorio, P., Ye, F. (2012). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Service-Learning on the Social, Personal, and Cognitive Outcomes of Learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9-27. doi: 10.5465/amle.2010.0072 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |


