Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online June 15, 2020

A Multidimensional Measure of Responsible Leadership: Integrating Strategy and Ethics

Abstract

Research on leadership generally discusses the normative and strategic perspectives of leadership separately. However, in the context of stakeholder theory and corporate sustainability, researchers and practitioners have called for the integration of these two seemingly disparate perspectives to create a hybrid leadership framework. In this regard, theoretical work on responsible leadership (RL) combines the disciplines of ethics and strategy to propose integrative behaviors. Nonetheless, RL mostly has been explored as a one-dimensional concept with stakeholder welfare as the focus. Although this aspect is salient, leaders must display other ethical and strategic behaviors to respond to the changing demands of business. Therefore, we combine such behaviors into one RL framework. Through a strategic lens, we define the first two dimensions of RL as sustainable growth focus and multistakeholder consideration. Furthermore, these goal-setting behaviors are looked upon as genuine when they depend on leaders’ ethical behaviors. Therefore, we consider ethical leadership to be an inherent part of RL through the dimensions of the moral person and moral manager. Across four quantitative studies, we test the construct validity of the suggested four-factor structure of RL as well as its ability to predict relevant organizational outcomes such as individual followers’ moral courage and citizenship behaviors toward stakeholders.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Banks G. C., McCauley K. D., Gardner W. L., Guler C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 634–652.
Brown M. E., Trevino L. K., Harrison D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
Butler J. K. Jr., Cantrell R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.
Byrne B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cameron K. (2011). Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 25–35.
Ciulla J. B. (1991). Why is business talking about ethics? Reflections on foreign conversations. California Management Review, 34, 67–86.
Coyle-Shapiro J. A. M., Kessler I., Purcell J. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 69–86.
Day D. V. (2012). Leadership. In Kozlowski S. W. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 696–729). Oxford University Press.
Dimitriades Z. S. (2007). The influence of service climate and job involvement on customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in Greek service organizations: A survey. Employee Relations, 29, 469–491.
Doh J. P., Quigley N. R. (2014). Responsible leadership and stakeholder management: Influence pathways and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 255–274.
Doh J. P., Stumpf S. A., Tymon W. G. (2011). Responsible leadership helps retain talent in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 85–100.
Edwards J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144–192.
Eisenbeiß S. A., Brodbeck F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 343–359.
Elms H., Brammer S., Harris J. D., Phillips R. A. (2010). New directions in strategic management and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 401–425.
Epstein M. J., Roy M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34, 585–604.
Eva N., Robin M., Sendjaya S., van Dierendonck D., Liden R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 111–132.
Fiske D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Aldine.
Fornell C., Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
Freeman R. E., Auster E. R. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 15–23.
Gatewood R. D., Carroll A. B. (1991). Assessment of ethical performance of organization members: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 16, 667–690.
Hamel G., Prahalad C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press.
Hannah S. T., Avolio B. J. (2010). Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62, 291–310.
Harris L. S., Kuhnert K. W. (2008). Looking through the lens of leadership: A constructive developmental approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 47–67.
Helsing D., Howell A. (2014). Understanding leadership from the inside out: Assessing leadership potential using constructive-developmental theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 186–204.
Hinkin T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.
Hirst G., Mann L., Bain P., Pirola-Merlo A., Richver A. (2004). Learning to lead: The development and testing of a model of leadership learning. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 311–327
Hitt M. A., Keats B. W., DeMarie S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12, 22–42.
Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
Kanungo R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’administration, 18, 257–265.
Kline R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Latham G. P., Yukl G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824–845.
Leavy B. (1996). On studying leadership in the strategy field. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 435–454.
Lee D., Choi Y., Youn S., Chun J. U. (2017). Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader–follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 47–57.
Lee N., Cadogan J. W. (2013). Problems with formative and higher-order reflective variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 242–247.
Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Meuser J. D., Hu J., Wu J., Liao C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 254–269.
Lynham S. A., Chermack T. J. (2006). Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12, 73–88.
Maak T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 329–343.
Maak T., Pless N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.
Maak T., Pless N. M., Voegtlin C. (2016). Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 463–493.
Marginson D., McAulay L. (2008). Exploring the debate on short-termism: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 273–292.
Maritz R., Pretorius M., Plant K. (2011). Exploring the interface between strategy–making and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 101–113.
Miska C., Hilbe C., Mayer S. (2014). Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: A rationality-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 349–360.
Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Patzer M., Voegtlin C., Scherer A. G. (2018). The normative justification of integrative stakeholder engagement: A Habermasian view on responsible leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28, 325–354.
Pearce C. L., Wassenaar C. L., Manz C. C. (2014). Is shared leadership the key to responsible leadership? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 275–288.
Pless N. M. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 437–456.
Pless N. M., Maak T. (2005). Relational intelligence for leading responsibly in a connected world. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 11–16). Academy of Management.
Pless N. M., Maak T., Stahl G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service-learning programs: The Ulysses experience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 237–260.
Pless N. M., Maak T., Waldman D. A. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 51–65.
Podsakoff N. P., Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Klinger R. L. (2013). Are we really measuring what we say we’re measuring? Using video techniques to supplement traditional construct validation procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 99–113.
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Podsakoff P. M., Podsakoff N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 11–33.
Schneider S. C. (1989). Strategy formulation: The impact of national culture. Organization Studies, 10, 149–168.
Schraa-Liu T., Trompenaars F. (2006). Towards responsible leadership through reconciling dilemmas. In Maak T., Pless N. M. (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 138–154). Routledge.
Sekerka L. E., Bagozzi R. P. (2007). Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 132–149.
Smith A. M. (2007). On being responsible and holding responsible. The Journal of Ethics, 11, 465–484.
Stahl G. K., Sully de Luque M. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 235–254.
Stazyk E. C., Davis R. S. (2020). Transformational leaders: Bridging the gap between goal ambiguity and public value involvement. Public Management Review, 22, 364–385.
Sturt D., Nordstrom T. (2016, January). True or false? “Employees today stay only for one or two years.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidsturt/2016/01/13/true-or-false-employees-today-only-stay-one-or-two-years/#2e53e2216b4c
Svensson G., Wood G. (2006). Sustainable components of leadership effectiveness in organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 25, 522–534.
Székely F., Knirsch M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23, 628–647.
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
Tracey J. B., Tews M. J. (2005). Construct validity of a general training climate scale. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 353–374.
Trevino L. K., Brown M. E. (2007). Ethical leadership. In Nelson D. L., Cooper C. L. (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positive at work (pp. 101–116). SAGE.
Trevino L. K., Hartman L. P., Brown M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42, 128–142.
Valcea S., Hamdani M. R., Buckley M. R., Novicevic M. M. (2011). Exploring the developmental potential of leader–follower interactions: A constructive-developmental approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 604–615.
Van Dierendonck D., Nuijten I. (2011). The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 249–267.
Voegtlin C. (2011). Development of a scale measuring discursive responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 57–73.
Voegtlin C. (2016). What does it mean to be responsible? Addressing the missing responsibility dimension in ethical leadership research. Leadership, 12, 581–608.
Voegtlin C., Patzer M., Scherer A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 1–16.
Waldman D. A., Balven R. M. (2014). Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 224–234.
Waldman D. A., Galvin B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 327–341.
Walumbwa F. O., Avolio B. J., Gardner W. L., Wernsing T. S., Peterson S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.
Wang T., Bansal P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1135–1153.
Yukl G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Yukl G. A., Mahsud R., Hassan S., Prussia G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 38–48.
Zhang L. F. (2005). Predicting cognitive development, intellectual styles, and personality traits from self-rated abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 67–88.

Biographies

Swati Agarwal is a research scholar at IIT Delhi with interest in Leadership Ethics and OB. She is an MBA from MICA, Ahmedabad and B.E. from Punjab University, India.
Kanika T. Bhal is dean (Planning) and professor (HR/OB) at IIT Delhi. A PhD from IIT Kanpur, she has been a visiting fellow at the Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, USA. Her research interests have been in the areas of leadership, culture, and ethics. She has published over 70 articles in refereed international and national journals, and has authored one and co-authored two books (published by Sage), besides having supervised several doctoral and Masters’ level theses in these areas. Her research has found financial support from the government as well as the industry and she has done sponsored research for Dalmia Group, MHRD, and GLOBE project with the Fordham University (and Wharton Business School) and the US Air Force. She has been providing consulting expertise both to the government as well the business on various policy and strategy-related issues. She has been a consultant to organizations like Fifth Central Pay Commission of India, First National Judicial Pay Commission of India, DRDO, Tibetan Govt., UPSC, DGS&D, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, National Institute of Communicable Diseases and many private organizations including Hewlett Packard (USA).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: June 15, 2020
Issue published: October 2020

Keywords

  1. responsible leadership
  2. construct validation
  3. scale development
  4. integrative leadership framework

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kanika T. Bhal
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India

Notes

Swati Agarwal, Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, IV Floor, Vishwakarma Bhavan, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Group & Organization Management.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 4436

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 24 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 23

  1. Employees' perceptions of responsible leadership in private security: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Toward a view of integrating corporate sustainability into strategy: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Responsible Leadership with Chinese Characteristics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Business Goal Difficulty and Socially Irresponsible Executive Behavior...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Responsible leadership and its place in the leadership domain: A meani...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Responsible leadership and turnover intentions in health-care professi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Ethical leadership, safety climate, and employee health and safety: le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Global responsible leadership traits and employee sustainable performa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. How Do Normative Public Values Promote Service Innovative Behavior in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. How CEO responsible leadership shapes corporate social responsibility ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Theories, constructs and contexts in responsible leadership: a future ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The Airbus bribery scandal: A collective myopia perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Promoting employee green behavior in the Chinese and Vietnamese hospit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. How and when responsible leadership facilitates work engagement: a mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Antecedents of Responsible Leadership: Proactive and Passive Responsib...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Does top management team responsible leadership help employees go gree...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Hybrid Leadership Styles Then and Now
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A systematic and critical review of leadership styles in contemporary ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Responsible Leadership at the Time of the Pandemic: SMEs in India
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Responsible Leadership Fuels Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Roles ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Responsibility beyond the Board Room? A Systematic Review of Responsib...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Responsible leadership and employee outcomes: a systematic literature ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. CSR Reporting of Stakeholders’ Health: Proposal for a New Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text