Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 1, 2019

Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) With Micafungin: The Importance of Causality Assessment

Abstract

Background: Micafungin is increasingly used in the treatment and prevention of candidiasis in hospitalized patients. Limited data are available from which to assess the risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with micafungin. No studies, to date, have applied a standardized causality assessment method to the study of micafungin-associated DILI. Objective: This study aimed to identify the frequency and clinical pattern of DILI in micafungin-treated patients as determined using 2 standardized causality assessment algorithms. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of micafungin-treated patients at a single center between May 15, 2017, and May 15, 2018. DILI was defined on the basis of liver test elevations and the presence of associated signs and symptoms. The Roussel UClaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) and the Naranjo algorithm were applied to each case. Results: A total of 99 patients were assessed; 52 were excluded, with a final sample of 47 evaluable patients. The definition of DILI was met in 9 (19%) patients, with a clinical pattern consistent with cholestatic injury in 7 of 9 (78%) patients. No cases were associated with jaundice. Agreement between the 2 causality assessment methods occurred in 4 of 9 (44%) cases. Application of the RUCAM algorithm led to the exclusion of 4 cases, resulting in a final reported prevalence of micafungin-associated DILI of 10.6%. Conclusion and Relevance: Asymptomatic DILI was identified in 10.6% of micafungin-treated patients. The choice of a causality assessment nomogram substantially influenced the determination of DILI prevalence. Compared with the Naranjo algorithm, the RUCAM algorithm is recommended as a more precise tool of assessing the relationship between drug exposure and DILI.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:e1-e50.
2. Mycamine [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Astellas Pharma US, Inc; 2008.
3. Vekeman F, Weiss L, Aram J, et al. Retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of severe hepatotoxicity in hospitalized patients treated with echinocandins for invasive candidiasis in the presence of confounding by indication. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:438-452.
4. Wang JL, Chang CH, Young-Xu Y, Chan KA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2409-2419.
5. Schneeweiss S, Carver PL, Datta K, et al. Short-term risk of liver and renal injury in hospitalized patients using micafungin: a multicenter cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:2938-2944.
6. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239-245.
7. Teschke R, Frenzel C, Schulze J, Eickhoff A. Herbal hepatoxicity: challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:2864-2882.
8. Hayashi PH. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Causality Assessment: criteria and experience in the United States. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:201:
9. Teschke R, Eickhoff A. Suspected liver injury and the dilemma of causality. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:1095-1098.
10. Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL, et al. ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:950-967.
11. Navarro VJ, Senior JR. Drug-related hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:731-739.
12. Danan G, Teschke R. RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury: the update. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;17:E14.
13. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012. https://livertox.nih.gov/. Accessed October 7, 2019.
14. Hoofnagle JH, Bjornsson ES. Drug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:264-273.
15. Yamazaki S, Nakamura F, Yoshimi A, Ichikawa M, Nannya Y, Kurokawa M. Safety of high-dose micafungin for patients with hematologic diseases. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:2572-2576
16. Yamaguchi M, Kurokawa T, Ishiyama K, et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin as an empirical therapy for invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic disorders: a multicenter, prospective study. Ann Hematol. 2011;90:1209-1217.
17. Kohno S, Izumikawa K, Yoshida M, et al. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of caspofungin versus micafungin in the treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:387-397.
18. Pappas PG, Rotstein CM, Betts RF, et al. Micafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:883-893.
19. Goto N, Hara T, Tsurumi H, et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for treating febrile neutropenia in hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:872-876.
20. Kobayashi R, Suzuki N, Yoshida M, et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies: a multicenter prospective study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;35:e276-e279.
21. van Burik JA, Ratanatharathorn V, Stepan De, et al; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1407-1416.
22. Kuse ER, Chetchotsakd P, da Cunha CA, et al; Micafungin Invasive Candidiasis Working Group. Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007;369:1519-1527.
23. Kyriakidis I, Tragiannidis A, Munchen S, Groll AH. Clinical hepatotoxicity associated with antifungal agents. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16:149-165.
24. Cornely OA, Meems L, Herbrecht R, Viscoli C, van Amsterdam RG, Ruhnke M. Randomised, multicentre trial of micafungin vs. an institutional standard regimen for salvage treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2015;58:58-64.
25. Yanni SB, Augustijns PF, Benjamin DK Jr, Brouwer KLR, Thakker D, Annaert PP. In vitro investigation of the hepatobiliary disposition mechanisms of the antifungal agent micafungin in humans and rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1848-1856.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 1, 2019
Issue published: June 2020

Keywords

  1. micafungin
  2. echinocandin
  3. liver injury
  4. liver diseases
  5. causality assessment

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2019.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 31786964

Authors

Affiliations

Caitlin Mullins, PharmD, BCCCP
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Kirthana Beaulac, PharmD, BCIDP
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

Notes

Lynne Sylvia, Department of Pharmacy, Tufts Medical Center, Box #420, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1033

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 7 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 8

  1. Risk assessment of micafungin-induced liver injury using spontaneous r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Antifungal Drugs and Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Real-World Study Lev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Echinocandins
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Reply: Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) With Micafungin: The Importanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  6. Comment: Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) With Micafungin: The Importa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  7. Worldwide Use of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 81,856 Idiosyncrati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Multiple drugs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text