Abstract
This study examines term limits to determine the effect they have on female candidate emergence in state legislatures. Initial research finds a negative relationship between term limits and female representation. I offer a candidate-level theory and empirical approach to reevaluate how term limits affect female representation overtime. I argue term limits create an incentive structure that favors female candidates since the incumbency advantage is lessened. To test this theory, I set up a quasi-natural experiment with term limits as the treatment in a difference-in-differences test. Furthermore, I also run logistical regression analysis using candidate-level data from all fifty states from 1990 to 2000. I find women are more likely to run for office in open seats created by term limits. Last, this pattern holds for both Republican and Democratic female candidates.
References
|
Barnes, Tiffany, Branton, Regina P., Cassese, Erin. 2017. “A Reexamination of Women’s Electoral Success in Open Seat Elections: The Conditioning Effect of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38:298–317. Google Scholar | |
|
Bernstein, Robert, Chadha., Anita 2003. “The Effects of Term Limits on Representation: Why So Few Women.” In The Test of Time: Coping with Legislative Term Limits, edited by Farmer, Rick, Rausch, John David, Green, John Clifford, 147–58. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Black, Gordon . 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66 (1): 144–59. Google Scholar | |
|
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Lehman, Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Campbell, David, Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” The Journal of Politics 68:233–47. Google Scholar | |
|
Canon, Bradley . 1978. “Factionalism in the South: A Test of Theory and a Revisitation of V. O. Key.” American Journal of Political Science 22:833–48. Google Scholar | |
|
Carroll, Susan . 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Carroll, Susan, Jenkins, Krista. 2001. “Do Term Limits Help Women Get Elected?” Social Science Quarterly 82 (1): 197–201. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Carroll, Susan, Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Center for American Women and Politics . 2014. “Women in State Legislatures. Fact Sheet.” www.cawp.rutgers.edu. Google Scholar | |
|
Clark, Janet . 1994. “Getting There: Women in Political Office.” In Different Roles, Different Voice, edited by Githens, M, Norris, P., Lovenduski, J., 63–76. New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar | |
|
Crane, Edward H. 1995. “Testimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate.” US Term Limits Foundation Outlook Series 101 (1). https://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/congressional-term-limits Google Scholar | |
|
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Dolan, Kathleen, Deckman, Melissa, Swers, Michele. 2007. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Ferry, Jonathan . 1994. “Women, Minorities and Term Limits: American’s Path to a Representative Congress.” U.S. Term Limits Foundation Outlook Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Term Limits Foundation Google Scholar | |
|
Fox, Richard L. 2000. “Gender and Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, edited by Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, Josephson, Jyl J., 227–56. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. Google Scholar | |
|
Fox, Richard L., Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80. Google Scholar | |
|
Fulton, Sarah . 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Fulton, Sarah . 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-Dynamics and Micro-Mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 605–30. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Fulton, Sarah. 2006. “The Sense of a Women: Gender Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Jacobson, Gary, Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Klarner, Carl, Berry, William, Carsey, Thomas, Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard, Powell, Lynda, Snyder, James. 2013. State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2010). ICPSR34297-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-01-11. doi:10.3886/ICPSR34297.v1. Google Scholar | |
|
Kurtz, Karl T., Cain, Bruce, Niemi, Richard. 2007. “Conclusions and Implications.” In Institutional Change in American Politics: The Case of Term Limits, edited by Kurtz, Karl, Cain, Bruce, Niemi, Richard, 185–98. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lawless, Jennifer, Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 67–82. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Lazarus, Jeffrey . 2008. “Buying in: Testing the Rational Model of Candidates Entry.” The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 837–50. Google Scholar | |
|
Mooney, Christopher . 2009. “Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship: A Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9 (2): 204–28. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
National Conference of State Legislatures . 2014. “The Term Limited States.” http://www.ncsl.org/. Google Scholar | |
|
Norrander, Barbara, Wilcox, Clyde. 2012. “Trends in the Geography of Women in the U.S. State Legislatures.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Thomas, Sue, Wilcox, Clyde, 273–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Osborn, L. Tracy . 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Reed, Robert, Shansberg, Eric. 1995. “The House under Term Limits: What would It Look Like?” Social Science Quarterly 76:698–719. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Sanbonmatsu, Kira . 2006. Where Women Run. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, Carroll, Susan J., Walsh, Debbie. Center for American Women Politics (CAWP) Recruitment Studies 2008. ICPSR35244-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-05-13. doi:10.3886/ICPSR35244.v1. Google Scholar | |
|
Sapiro, Virginia . 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26:265–79. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28. Google Scholar | |
|
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar | |
|
Squire, Peverill . 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:69–79. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Swers, Michele . 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Thompson, Joel, Moncrief, Gary. 1993. “The Implications of Term Limits for Women and Minorities: Some Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 74 (2): 300–309. Google Scholar | ISI |
