This study examines term limits to determine the effect they have on female candidate emergence in state legislatures. Initial research finds a negative relationship between term limits and female representation. I offer a candidate-level theory and empirical approach to reevaluate how term limits affect female representation overtime. I argue term limits create an incentive structure that favors female candidates since the incumbency advantage is lessened. To test this theory, I set up a quasi-natural experiment with term limits as the treatment in a difference-in-differences test. Furthermore, I also run logistical regression analysis using candidate-level data from all fifty states from 1990 to 2000. I find women are more likely to run for office in open seats created by term limits. Last, this pattern holds for both Republican and Democratic female candidates.

Barnes, Tiffany, Branton, Regina P., Cassese, Erin. 2017. “A Reexamination of Women’s Electoral Success in Open Seat Elections: The Conditioning Effect of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38:298317.
Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robert, Chadha., Anita 2003. “The Effects of Term Limits on Representation: Why So Few Women.” In The Test of Time: Coping with Legislative Term Limits, edited by Farmer, Rick, Rausch, John David, Green, John Clifford, 147–58. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar
Black, Gordon . 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66 (1): 144–59.
Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Lehman, Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Campbell, David, Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” The Journal of Politics 68:233–47.
Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley . 1978. “Factionalism in the South: A Test of Theory and a Revisitation of V. O. Key.” American Journal of Political Science 22:833–48.
Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan . 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan, Jenkins, Krista. 2001. “Do Term Limits Help Women Get Elected?” Social Science Quarterly 82 (1): 197201.
Google Scholar | ISI
Carroll, Susan, Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics . 2014. “Women in State Legislatures. Fact Sheet.” www.cawp.rutgers.edu.
Google Scholar
Clark, Janet . 1994. “Getting There: Women in Political Office.” In Different Roles, Different Voice, edited by Githens, M, Norris, P., Lovenduski, J., 6376. New York: HarperCollins.
Google Scholar
Crane, Edward H. 1995. “Testimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate.” US Term Limits Foundation Outlook Series 101 (1). https://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/congressional-term-limits
Google Scholar
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, Deckman, Melissa, Swers, Michele. 2007. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Ferry, Jonathan . 1994. “Women, Minorities and Term Limits: American’s Path to a Representative Congress.” U.S. Term Limits Foundation Outlook Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Term Limits Foundation
Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 2000. “Gender and Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, edited by Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, Josephson, Jyl J., 227–56. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.
Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah . 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Fulton, Sarah . 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-Dynamics and Micro-Mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 605–30.
Google Scholar | Medline
Fulton, Sarah. 2006. “The Sense of a Women: Gender Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Jacobson, Gary, Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl, Berry, William, Carsey, Thomas, Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard, Powell, Lynda, Snyder, James. 2013. State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2010). ICPSR34297-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-01-11. doi:10.3886/ICPSR34297.v1.
Google Scholar
Kurtz, Karl T., Cain, Bruce, Niemi, Richard. 2007. “Conclusions and Implications.” In Institutional Change in American Politics: The Case of Term Limits, edited by Kurtz, Karl, Cain, Bruce, Niemi, Richard, 185–98. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer, Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.
Google Scholar | ISI
Lazarus, Jeffrey . 2008. “Buying in: Testing the Rational Model of Candidates Entry.” The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 837–50.
Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher . 2009. “Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship: A Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9 (2): 204–28.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
National Conference of State Legislatures . 2014. “The Term Limited States.” http://www.ncsl.org/.
Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, Wilcox, Clyde. 2012. “Trends in the Geography of Women in the U.S. State Legislatures.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Thomas, Sue, Wilcox, Clyde, 273–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Osborn, L. Tracy . 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Reed, Robert, Shansberg, Eric. 1995. “The House under Term Limits: What would It Look Like?” Social Science Quarterly 76:698719.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sanbonmatsu, Kira . 2006. Where Women Run. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, Carroll, Susan J., Walsh, Debbie. Center for American Women Politics (CAWP) Recruitment Studies 2008. ICPSR35244-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-05-13. doi:10.3886/ICPSR35244.v1.
Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia . 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26:265–79.
Google Scholar | Medline
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.
Google Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill . 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:6979.
Google Scholar | ISI
Swers, Michele . 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Thompson, Joel, Moncrief, Gary. 1993. “The Implications of Term Limits for Women and Minorities: Some Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 74 (2): 300309.
Google Scholar | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

PRQ-article-ppv for $37.50

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top