Abstract
Journalism students can no longer focus on being just writers or photographers or videographers. They must leave college with a multitude of media skills to have the greatest potential for career success. The development of the iPad and supporting apps has created a “one-stop shop” of journalistic tools that enable students to learn those skills, including note-taking devices, recording devices, research platforms, and word processing. We conducted a yearlong study of beginning journalism students utilizing one-to-one iPads to examine the impact of iPads and journalistically focused apps in a “flipped” journalism classroom environment (where video lectures are homework, and skill development and execution are done in class). Our goal was to identify how the iPad could be used to augment journalistic training and determine whether use of such technology would accelerate and enhance student learning. We found that confidence in the iPad as a journalistic tool and perceptions of journalistic ability increased, as did students’ execution of publishable-quality writing assignments. Qualitative results identified some of the challenges and benefits related to iPad use in a journalism class. Overall, we found that students did utilize the iPad and apps to more quickly create publishable-quality journalism assignments, which included effective reporting and use of multimedia and social media.
|
Brand, J., Kinash, S. (2010). Pad-agogy: A quasi-experimental and ethnographic pilot test of the iPad in a blended mobile learning environment. In Steel, C. H., Keppell, M. J., Gerbic, P., Housego, S. (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future—Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 147-151). Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. Google Scholar | |
|
Bromley, K. (2012). Using smartphones to supplement classroom reading. The Reading Teacher, 66, 340-344. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Culén, A. L., Gasparini, A. (2011). iPad: A new classroom technology? A report from two pilot studies. INFuture Proceedings, 199-208. Retrieved from http://infoz.ffzg.hr/INFuture/2011/papers/3-02%20Culen,%20Gasparini,%20iPad%20-%20A%20New%20Classroom%20Technology.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Grinols, A. B., Rajesh, R. (2014). Multitasking with smartphones in the college classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 89-95. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Herreid, C. F., Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66. Google Scholar | |
|
Hirst, P. H. (2010). International Library of the Philosophy of Education: Vol. 12. Knowledge and the curriculum: A collection of philosophical papers. Routledge e-library. Google Scholar | |
|
Houser, C., Thornton, P., Kluge, D. (2002). Mobile learning: Cell phones and PDAs for education. Presented at Computers in Education International Conference, Kinjo Gakuin University, Japan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Huber, G. P. (1983). Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Management Science, 29, 567-579. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ireland, G. V., Woollerton, M. (2010). The impact of the iPad and iPhone on education. Journal of Bunkyo Gakuin University Department of Foreign Languages and Bunkyo Gakuin College, 10, 31-48. Google Scholar | |
|
Lengel, J. G., Lengel, K. M. (2006). Integrating technology: A practical guide. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar | |
|
Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on small systems (pp. 162-169), ACM New York, NY. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Marmarelli, T., Ringle, M. (2011). The reed college iPad study. Portland, OR: The Reed Institute. Google Scholar | |
|
Mason, R., Rennie, F. (2007). Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 196-203. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pagani, M. (2004). Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 46-59. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Patrão, C., Figueiredo, A. D. (2011). Educating the new generation journalist: From Moodle to Facebook. International Symposium on Online Journalism. Google Scholar | |
|
Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey . (2004, May). National report: College students. Rochester, NY: Harris Poll. Google Scholar | |
|
Saunders, F. C., Gale, A. W. (2012). Digital or didactic: Using learning technology to confront the challenge of large cohort teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 847-858. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Shepherd, I. J., Reeves, B. (2011). iPad or iFad: The reality of a paperless classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 12(5), 40-53. Google Scholar | |
|
Skiba, D. J. (2011). On the horizon mobile devices: Are they a distraction or another learning tool? Nursing Education Perspectives, 32, 195-197. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Traxler, J. (2010). Will student devices deliver innovation, inclusion, and transformation? Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 6(1), 3-15. Google Scholar | |
|
Wallace, S., Clark, M., White, J. (2012). “It’s on my iPhone”: Attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ open, 2(4), e001099. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wenger, D. H., Owens, L. C., Thompson, P. (2014). Help wanted 2010 an examination of new media skills required by top U.S. news companies. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67, 9-25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Wilson, B., Gutsche, R., Schwartz, D. (2010). Bringing news to life: Potential for scholastic journalism “enormous.” In Wilson, B. (Ed.), Communication: Journalism education today (pp. 2-5). Manhattan, KS: Journalism Education Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. The Teachers College Record, 104, 482-515. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
Author Biographies
Nicole Kraft, MA, is an assistant professor (clinical) of Journalism at The Ohio State University. She spent more than 20 years as a professional journalist and is currently pursuing her doctorate in education technology at The Ohio State University. She studies how technology can be used to enhance journalism and journalistic education.
A doctoral student at UNC-Chapel Hill’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Natalee Seely spent three years as a reporter before returning to academia to earn her master’s degree in Communication at The Ohio State University. She studies journalism and media effects, particularly in the area of online news and audience feedback.

