Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals

Abstract

Introduction

Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs can lead to long-term adverse effects on workers’ health. Environmental monitoring is conducted once a year, as part of a Canadian monitoring program. The objective was to describe contamination with 11 antineoplastic drugs measured on surfaces.

Methods

Six standardized sites in oncology pharmacy and six in outpatient clinic were sampled in each hospital. Samples were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (non-platinum drugs) and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (platinum-based drugs). The limits of detection (in ng/cm2) were: 0.0006 for cyclophosphamide; 0.001 for docetaxel; 0.04 for 5-fluorouracil; 0.0004 for gemcitabine; 0.0007 for irinotecan; 0.0009 for methotrexate; 0.004 for paclitaxel, 0.009 for vinorelbine, 0.02 for doxorubicine, 0.0037 for etoposide and 0.004 for the platinum. Sub-analyses were done with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

Results

122 Canadian hospitals participated. Cyclophosphamide (451/1412, 32% of positive samples, 90th percentile of concentration 0.0160 ng/cm2) and gemcitabine (320/1412, 23%, 0.0036 ng/cm2) were most frequently measured on surfaces. The surfaces most frequently contaminated with at least one drug were the front grille inside the biological safety cabinet (97/121, 80%) and the armrest of patient treatment chair (92/118, 78%).The distribution of cyclophosphamide concentration was higher for centers that prepared ≥ 5000 antineoplastic drug preparations/year (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

This monitoring program allowed centers to benchmark their contamination with pragmatic contamination thresholds derived from the Canadian 90th percentiles. Problematic areas need corrective measures such as decontamination. The program helps to increase the workers’ awareness.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Brenner DR, Weir HK, Demers AA, et al. Canadian cancer statistics advisory committee. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020. CMAJ 2020; 192: E199–E205.
2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH list of hazardous drugs in healthcare settings 2020. Publication Number 2020-xxx (Supersedes 2016–161), https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket233c/pdfs/DRAFT-NIOSH-Hazardous-Drugs-List-2020.pdf (2020, accessed 10 November 2021).
3. Association paritaire pour la santé et la sécurité du travail du secteur affaires sociales. Guide de prévention – Manipulation sécuritaire des médicaments dangereux. http://asstsas.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/documents/Guides_Broch_Depl/GP65-medicaments_dangereux06-2021.pdf (2021, accessed 10 November 2021).
4. U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs—Handling in healthcare Settings USP 39–NF 34, First Supplement, http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/usp-nf-commentary/gc__800_commentary_final.pdf (2016, accessed 10 November 2021).
5. Crul M, Hilhorst S, Breukels O, et al. Occupational exposure of pharmacy technicians and cleaning staff to cytotoxic drugs in Dutch hospitals. J Occup Environ Hyg 2020; 17: 343–352.
6. Villa A, Molimard M, Sakr D, et al. Nurses’ internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2021; 94: 1839–1850.
7. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377–381.
8. Chabut C, Tanguay C, Gagné S, et al. Surface contamination with nine antineoplastic drugs in 109 Canadian centers; 10 years of a monitoring program. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2021 Feb 10; 1–10. Epub ahead of print.
9. Santé Canada. Guidance document. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. ICH Topic Q2(R1). 2015/06/05. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/dhp-mps/alt_formats/pdf/prodpharma/applic-demande/guide-ld/ich/qual/q2r1-eng.pdf
10. Official Journal of the European Union. Commission Directive 2009/90/EC of 31 July 2009 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0090 (2009, accessed 10 November 2021).
11. Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1990; 5: 46–51.
12. Jeronimo M, Arnold S, Astrakianakis G, et al. Spatial and temporal variability in antineoplastic drug surface contamination in cancer care centers in alberta and minnesota. Ann Work Expo Health 2021; 65: 760–774.
13. Rossignol E, Amiand MB, Sorrieul J, et al. A fully validated simple new method for environmental monitoring by surface sampling for cytotoxics. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2020; 101: 106652.
14. Bláhová L, Kuta J, Doležalová L, et al. The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2021; 94: 1687–1702.
15. Walton A, Bush MA, Douglas C, et al. Surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs on two inpatient oncology units. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47: 263–272.
16. Acramel A, Chouquet T, Plé A, et al. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantification method for 14 cytotoxic drugs in environmental samples. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2020; 34: e8594.
17. Sottani C, Grignani E, Oddone E, et al. Monitoring surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs in Italian hospitals: performance-based hygienic guidance values (HGVs) project. Ann Work Expo Health 2017; 61: 994–1002.
18. Hori A, Shimura M, Iida Y, et al. Occupational exposure of platinum-based anti-cancer drugs: five-year monitoring of hair and environmental samples in a single hospital. J Occup Med Toxicol 2020; 15: 29.
19. Kopp B, Schierl R, Nowak D. Evaluation of working practices and surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in outpatient oncology health care settings. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013; 86: 47–55.
20. Labrèche F, Ouellet C, Roberge B, et al. Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: what about hospital sanitation personnel? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2021; 94: 1877–1888.
21. Mucci N, Dugheri S, Farioli A, et al. Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in hospital environments: potential risk associated with contact with cyclophosphamide- and ifosfamide-contaminated surfaces. Med Pr 2020; 71: 519–529.
22. Korczowska E, Crul M, Tuerk J, et al. Environmental contamination with cytotoxic drugs in 15 hospitals from 11 european countries – results of the MASHA project. Eur J Oncol Pharm 2020; 3: e24.
23. Piccardo MT, Forlani A, Izzotti A. Effectiveness of closed system drug transfer devices in reducing leakage during antineoplastic drugs compounding. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 7957.
24. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). A vapor containment performance protocol for closed system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs. Notice of draft document for public comment. Fed Regist 2015; 80: 53803. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket288/pdfs/a-vapor-containment-performance-protocol-for-closed-system-transfer-devices.pdf
25. Wilkinson AS, Allwood MC, Morris CP, et al. Performance testing protocol for closed-system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0205263.
26. Forshay CM, Streeter SO, Salch SA, et al. Application of the 2015 proposed NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol for closed system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 25: 1160–1166.
27. Halloush S, Reveles IA, Koeller J. Evaluating Six commercially available closed-system drug-transfer devices against NIOSH's 2015 Draft vapor protocol. Hosp Pharm 2020; 55: 391–399.
28. Nomura H, Katakura N, Morita T, et al. Surface contamination of the outer and blister packages of oral anticancer drugs: a multicenter study. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26: 141–145.
29. Friese CR, Wong M, Fauer A, et al. Hazardous drug exposure: case report analysis From a prospective, multisite study of oncology Nurses’ exposure in ambulatory settings. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24: 249–255.
30. Walton AL, Kneipp S, Linnan L, et al. Nursing Assistants’ Use of personal protective equipment regarding contact With excreta contaminated With antineoplastic drugs. Oncol Nurs Forum 2019; 46: 689–700.
31. Simon N, Odou P, Décaudin B, et al. Occupational exposure to conventional antineoplastic drugs: can it be further limited? Eur J Hosp Pharm 2020; 27: 251–252.
32. Petit O, Saint-Lorant G, Vasseur M, et al. Fastidious chemical decontamination after cyclophosphamide vial breakage in a compounding unit. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26: 2038–2041.
33. Sciubba F, Spagnoli M, Iavicoli S, et al. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite in the degradation antineoplastic drugs by NMR spectroscopy. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2020; 42: 109–120.
34. Connor TH, Zock MD, Snow AH. Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: methodology and recommendations. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016; 13: 658–667.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 12, 2022
Issue published: March 2023

Keywords

  1. Accupational exposure
  2. surface monitoring
  3. antineoplastic drugs
  4. cyclophosphamide
  5. gemcitabine

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2022.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Manuscript received: November 10, 2021
Revision received: December 17, 2021
Manuscript accepted: December 18, 2021
Published online: January 12, 2022
Issue published: March 2023
PubMed: 35018847

Authors

Affiliations

Clémence Delafoy
Pharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Claudine Roussy
Centre de Toxicologie du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Anny-France Hudon
Centre de Toxicologie du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Ciprian Mihai Cirtiu
Centre de Toxicologie du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Nicolas Caron
Centre de Toxicologie du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
Jean-François Bussières
Pharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Cynthia Tanguay
Pharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Notes

Cynthia Tanguay, Pharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, 3175, chemin de la Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montréal (Québec) H3T 1C5, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 192

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 5 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 2

  1. Evaluation of long-term data on surface contamination by antineoplasti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reporting environmental contamination results to healthcare workers co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

ISOPP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

ISOPP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text