Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 21, 2012

A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships

Abstract

In this article, we critically examine the social institution of monogamy. First, we discuss the lack of an adequate and consistent definition of the construct of monogamy and consider how common monogamy is. Next, we address perceived benefits of monogamy and whether those ostensible benefits are supported by empirical evidence. We conclude that evidence for the benefits of monogamy relative to other relationship styles is currently lacking, suggesting that, for those who choose it, consensual non-monogamy may be a viable alternative to monogamy. Implications for theories of close relationships are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Amato P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650-666.
Anderson E. (2010). ‘‘At least with cheating there is an attempt at monogamy’’: Cheating and monogamism among undergraduate heterosexual men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 851-872.
Asendorpf J. B., Van Aken M. A. G. (2003). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9 year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1-17.
Barash D. P., Lipton J. E. (2002). The myth of monogamy: Fidelity and infidelity in animals and people. New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks.
Barker M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my… partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75-88.
Bauman L. J., Berman R. (2005). Adolescent relationships and condom use: Trust, love and commitment. AIDS and Behavior, 9, 211-222.
Beck J. B. (1999). Hypoactive sexual desire disorder: An overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 919-927.
Beltran S., Cézilly F., Boissier J. (2009). Adult sex ratio affects divorce rate in the monogamous endoparasite Schistosoma mansoni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1363-1368.
Bettinger M. (2004). Polyamory and gay men. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1(1), 97-116.
Blasband D., Peplau L. A. (1985). Sexual exclusivity versus openness in gay male couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 395-412.
Blumstein P., Schwartz P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York, NY: Morrow.
Bolton M. P., McKay A., Schneider M. (2010). Relational influences on condom use discontinuation: A qualitative study of young adult women in dating relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 19(3), 91-104.
Bonello K., Cross M. C. (2010). Gay monogamy: I love you but I can’t have sex with only you. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 117-139.
Braunstein G. D., Sundwall D. A., Katz M., Shifren J. L., Buster J. E., Simon J. A., Rodenberg C. (2005). Safety and efficacy of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1582-1589.
Brennan K. A., Clark C. L., Shaver P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. In Simpson J. A., Rholes W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford.
Brewis A., Meyer M. (2005). Marital coitus across the life course. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 499-518.
Bringle R., Buunk B. P. (1991). Jealousy and extra-dyadic relationships. In McKinney K., Sprecher S. (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 135-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton P. J., Levine O. H., Jackson A. P., Hobfoll S. E., Shepherd J. B., Lavin J. P. (1998). Ambiguity of monogamy as a safer-sex goal among single, pregnant, inner-city women: Monogamy by whose definition? Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 227-232.
Brotherson S. E., Duncan W. C. (2004). Rebinding the ties that bind: Government efforts to preserve and promote marriage. Family Relations, 53, 459-468.
Brotto L. A. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 221-239.
Budner S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
Buss D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York, NY: Free Press.
Butzer B., Campbell L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141-154.
Calsyn D. A., Campbell A. N., Tross S., Hatch-Maillette M. A. (2011). Is monogamy or committed relationship status a marker for low sexual risk among men in substance abuse treatment? Clinical and methodological considerations. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 37, 294-300.
Carnes P. (1983). Out of the shadows. Minneapolis, MN: Compcare.
Catania J. A., Stone V., Binson D., Dolcini M. M. (1995). Changes in condom use among heterosexuals in Wave 3 of the AMEN survey. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 193-200.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Act against AIDS: Focus on monogamy. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/actagainstaids/basics/prevention.html
Cherlin A. J. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. Future of Children,15, 33-55.
Cherlin A. J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York, NY: Vintage.
Choi K. H., Catania J. A., Dolcini M. M. (1994). Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: Results from the national AIDS behavioral survey. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 2003-2007.
Civic D. (2000). College students’ reasons for nonuse of condoms within dating relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 95-105.
Clarke V. (2001). What about the children? Arguments against lesbian and gay parenting. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 555-570.
Clement U. (2002). Sex in long-term relationships: A systemic approach to sexual desire problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 241-246.
Cloud J. (1999, November). Henry & Mary & Janet & : Is your marriage a little dull?: The “polyamorists” say there’s another way. Time, 90.
Collins N. L., Read S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
Conley T. D., Moors A. C., Ziegler A., Matsick J. L., Rubin J.(2012). Condom efficacy and skill among sexually unfaithful and consensually non-monogamous individuals. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Conley T. D., Moors A. C., Matsick J. L., Ziegler A. (2011). [Prevalence of consensual non-monogamy in general samples]. Unpublished raw data.
Conley T. D., Moors A. C., Matsick J. L., Ziegler A. (2012a). The fewer the merrier? Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1530-2415.
Conley T. D., Moors A. C., Matsick J. L., Ziegler A. (2012b). [Unpublished participant responses from Study 1 in Conley, Moors, Matsick, et al., 2012]. Unpublished raw data.
Conley T. D., Moors A. C., Ziegler A., Karathanasis C. (2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly non-monogamous individuals. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1559-1565.
Corbin W. R., Fromme K. (2002). Alcohol use and serial monogamy as risks for sexually transmitted diseases in young adults. Health Psychology, 21, 229-236.
Critelli J. W., Suire D. M. (1998). Obstacles to condom use: The combination of other forms of birth control and short-term monogamy. Journal of American College Health, 46, 215-219.
Crowell J. A., Treboux D., Waters E. (2002). Stability of attachment representations: The transition to marriage. Developmental Psychology, 38, 467-479.
Davies S., Katz J., Jackson J. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 553-567.
De Raad B., Peabody D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451-474.
de Visser R., McDonald D. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual “swinging” couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459-476.
Drigotas S. M., Barta W. (2001). The cheating heart: Scientific explorations of infidelity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 177-180.
Easton D., Hardy J. W. (2009). The ethical slut: A practical guide to polyamory, open relationships & other adventures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Celestial Arts.
Emens E. F. (2004). Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 29, 277-757.
Emmers-Sommer T. M., Warber K., Halford J. (2010). Reasons for (non) engagement in infidelity. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 420-444.
Feeney J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9, 39-55.
Frank E., Anderson C., Kupfer D. J. (1976). Profiles of couples seeking sex therapy and marital therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 559-562.
Garcia J. R., Reiber C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192-208.
Getz L. L., Carter C. S. (1996). Prairie-vole partnerships. American Scientist, 84, 56-62.
Glauser W. (2011). How to talk to patients about STI screening. Medical Post, 47(7), 24.
Goetz A. T., Shackelford T. K., Romero G. A., Kaighobadi F., Miner E. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness, and paternity: Men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 481-489.
Greeley A. (1994). Marital infidelity. Society, 31, 9-14.
Gubernick D. J., Teferi T. (2000). Adaptive significance of male parental care in a monogamous mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 147-150.
Guerrero L. K., Andersen P. A., Afifi W. A. (2010). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Guerrero L. K., Spitzberg B. H., Yoshimura S. M. (2004). Sexual and emotional jealousy. In Harvey J. H., Wenzel A., Sprecher S. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 311-345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Harrison D. F., Wambach K., Byers J. B., Imershein A. W. (1991). AIDS knowledge and risk behaviors among culturally diverse women. AIDS Education and Prevention, 3, 79-89.
Hatfield E., Sprecher S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383-410.
Hawton K. (1982). Symposium on sexual dysfunction: The behavioural treatment of sexual dysfunction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 94-101.
Hazan C., Campa M., Gur-Yaish N. (2006). What is adult attachment? In Mikulincer M., Goodman G. S. (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex. New York, NY: Guilford.
Hazan C., Shaver P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Hendrick C., Hendrick S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
Hickson F., Davies P., Hunt A., Weatherburn P., McManus T., Coxon A. (1992). Maintenance of open gay relationships: Some strategies for protection against HIV. AIDS Care, 4, 409-419.
Holtzworth-Munroe A., Stuart G. L., Hutchinson G. (1997). Violent versus nonviolent husbands: Differences in attachment patterns, dependency, and jealousy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 314-331.
Hyde J. S., DeLamater J. D. (2000). Understanding human sexuality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Jenks R. J. (1985). Swinging: A test of two theories and a proposed new model. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 517-527.
Jenks R. J. (1998). Swinging: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 507-521.
Kipnis L. (2004). Against love: A polemic. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Kirkpatrick L. A., Davis K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502-512.
Kleiman D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39-69.
Klesse C. (2006). Polyamory and its “others”: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9, 565-583.
Koop C. E. (1987). Surgeon General’s report on acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Public Health Reports, 102, 1-3.
Kurdek L. A. (1988). Relationship quality of gay and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 15, 93-118.
Kurdek L. A., Schmitt J. P. (1985). Relationship quality of gay men in closed or open relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 85-99.
LaSala M. C. (2005). Extradyadic sex and gay male couples: Comparing monogamous and nonmonogamous relationships. Families in Society, 85, 405-412.
Laumann E. O., Gagnon J. H., Michael R. T., Michaels S. (2000). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Laumann E. O., Paik A., Rosen R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537-544.
Lee J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario, Canada: New Press. (Popular ed. 1976).
Lee R. B. (1982). Politics, sexual and non-sexual, In an egalitarian society. In Leacock E., Lee R. (Eds.), Politics and history in band societies (pp. 37-59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Levine S. B. (2003). The nature of sexual desire: A clinician’s perspective. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 279-285.
Levy M. B., Davis K. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471.
Ley D. J. (2009). Insatiable wives: Women who stray and the men who love them. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lopez F. G., Gover M. R., Leskela J., Sauer E. M., Schirmer L., Wyssmann J. (1997). Attachment styles, shame, guilt, and collaborative problem solving orientations. Personal Relationships, 4, 187-199.
McWhirter D. P., Mattison A. M. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Misovich S. J., Fisher J. D., Fisher W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72-107.
Montgomery K. A. (2008). Sexual desire disorders. Psychiatry, 5, 50-55.
Moors A. C., Edelstein R. S., Conley T. D. (2012). Avoiding monogamy: Attachment, sex, love, and consensual non-monogamy. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Association for Relationship Research, Chicago, IL.
Mosher W. D., Chandra A., Jones J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15-44 years of age, United States, 2002. In N.C. f. H. Statistics (Ed.), Advance data from vital and health statistics. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf
Mullen P. E. (1991). Jealousy: The pathology of passion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 593-601.
Myers T., Allman D., Calzavara L., Morrison K., Marchand R., Major C. (1999). Gay and bisexual men’s sexual partnerships and variations in risk behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8(2), 115.
Orzeck T., Lung E. (2005). Big-five personality differences of cheaters and non-cheaters. Current Psychology, 24, 274-287.
Owen J. J., Rhoades G. K., Stanley S. M., Fincham F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of sexual behavior, 39, 653-663.
Pallotta-Chiarolli M., Lubowitz S. (2003). Outside belonging: Multi-sexual relationships as border existence. Journal of Bisexuality, 3(1), 55-85.
Paulhus D. L., Williams K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
Perel E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Reconciling the erotic + the domestic. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Pfeiffer S. M., Wong P. T. (1989). Multidimensional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 181-196.
Pines A., Aronson E. (1981). Polyfidelity. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 4, 373-392.
Pines A., Aronson E. (1983). Antecedents, correlates, and consequences of sexual jealousy. Journal of Personality, 51, 108-136.
Pines A., Friedman A. (1998). Gender differences in romantic jealousy. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 54-71.
Pinkerton S. D., Abramson P. R. (1993). Evaluating the risks: A Bernoulli process model of HIV infection and risk reduction. Evaluation Review, 17, 504-528.
Pinkerton S. D., Abramson P. R. (1997). Condoms and the prevention of AIDS: Improving and promoting condoms may be a more effective tactic than monogamy, drugs or vaccines in fighting AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. American Scientist, 85, 364-373.
Pinsof W. M. (2002). The death of “Till death us do part”: The transformation of pair-bonding in the 20th Century. Family Process, 41, 135-157.
Platt R. A. L., Nalbone D. P., Casanova G. M., Wetchler J. L. (2008). Parental conflict and infidelity as predictors of adult children’s attachment style and infidelity. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 149-161.
Rankin C. H., Abrams T., Barry R. J., Bhatnagar S., Clayton D. F., Colombo J., Marsland S. (2009). Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92, 135-138.
Ritchie A., Barker M. (2006). “There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up”: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584-601.
Ross C. E. (1995). Reconceptualizing marital status as a continuum of social attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 129-140.
Rubin Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
Ryan C., Jethå C. (2010). Sex at dawn: The prehistoric origins of modern sexuality. New York, NY: Harper.
Salmansohn K. (2009). Prince harming syndrome: Break bad relationship patterns for good. Long Island City, NY: Langenscheidt Publishing.
Scarf M. (1988). Intimate partners: Patterns in love and marriage. New York, NY: Random House.
Schmitt D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral & brain sciences, 28, 247-275.
Sheff E. (2010). Strategies in polyamorous parenting. In Barker M., Langridge D. (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 169-181). New York, NY: Routledge.
Shulman S., Collins W. A., Knafo D. (1997). Afterword: Romantic relationships in adolescence—More than casual dating. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1997(78), 105-110.
Simpson J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971-980.
Simpson J. A., Gangestad S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
Solomon S. E., Rothblum E. D., Balsam K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561-575.
Stein S. (2012, May 5). Obama back gay marriage. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/obama-gay-marriage_n_1503245.html
Steiper M. E., Young N. M. (2009). Primates. In Hedges S. B., Kumar S. (Eds.), The timetree of life (pp. 482-486). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Stevens P. E. (1993). HIV risk reduction for three subgroups of lesbian and bisexual women in San Francisco — Year one: Project evaluation report. San Francisco, CA: Department of Public Health.
Stevens P. E. (1994). HIV prevention education for lesbians and bisexual women: A cultural analysis of a community intervention. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1565-1578.
Thompson A. P. (1983). Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1-22.
Tremayne S. (2009). Law, ethics and donor technologies in Shia Iran. In Birenbaum-Carmeli D., Inhorn M. C. (Eds.), Assisting reproduction, testing genes: Global encounters with the new biotechnologies (pp. 144-163). New York, NY: Bergahn Books.
Wagner G. J., Remien R. H., Dieguez A. C. (2000). Prevalence of extradyadic sex in male couples of mixed HIV status and its relationship to psychological distress and relationship quality. Journal of Homosexuality, 39(2), 31-46.
Walker T. R., Ehrenberg M. F. (1998). An exploratory study of young persons’ attachment styles and perceived reasons for parental divorce. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 320-342.
Warren J. T., Harvey S. M., Agnew C. R. (2010). One love: Explicit monogamy agreements among heterosexual young adult couples at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 1-8.
Weaver J. (2007). Cheating hearts: Who’s doing it and why: MSNBC.com/iVillage survey shows fidelity can be a tough promise to keep. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17951664/print/1/displaymode/1098/
Weitzman G. (2006). Therapy with clients who are bisexual and polyamorous. Journal of Bisexuality, 6, 137-164.
Wiederman M. W., Hurd C. (1999). Extradyadic involvement during dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 265-274.
Williams J. R., Catania K. C., Carter C. S. (1992). Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): The role of social and sexual experience. Hormones and Behavior, 26, 339-349.
Wosick-Correa K. (2010). Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 1, 44-61.
Zilbergeld B., Ellison C. R. (1980). Desire discrepancies and arousal problems in sex therapy. In Leiblum S. R., Pervin L. A. (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (pp. 65-101). New York, NY: Guilford.
Zuckerman M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 21, 2012
Issue published: May 2013

Keywords

  1. monogamy
  2. love
  3. non-monogamous relationships
  4. relationship quality

Rights and permissions

© 2012 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 23175520

Authors

Affiliations

Terri D. Conley
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
Ali Ziegler
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
Amy C. Moors
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
Jes L. Matsick
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
Brandon Valentine
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

Notes

Terri D. Conley, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 1012 East Hall, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Personality and Social Psychology Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11099

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 149 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 154

  1. Jealousy: A comparison of monogamous and consensually non-monogamous w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Stigma Toward Consensual Non-Monogamy: Thematic Analysis and Minority ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  3. Multidimensional Measurement of Attitudes Toward Consensual Non-Monoga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. It’s Just a Little Crush: Attraction to an Alternative and Romantic Re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Attachment Style, Emotion Dysregulation and Sexual Satisfaction Among ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Examining the Role of Mononormative Beliefs, Stigma, and Internalized ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social Views of Non-Mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Beyond the presumption of monogamy: the role of religiosity, political...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Relationship Status and Psychological Well-being: Initial Evidence for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Diversity and inclusion in relationship science: Reflections as an Int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Examining the Social Tabooisation of Asexuality: The Underpinnings of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Identifying Context-Related Socio-Cultural Predictors of Negative Atti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. No Remorse: Sexual Infidelity Is Not Clearly Linked with Relationship ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Personality and Mating Orientations in Monogamy and Consensual Non-Mon...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. The Impact of Social Media on Intimate Relationships among Chinese Col...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. “I’ve been cheated, been mistreated, when will I be loved”: Two decade...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Social Media as Input for Recruiment: Does Women’s Relationship Histor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evaluating Structural Therapy from a Consensual Nonmonogamy Lens
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Novogamy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Novogamy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Sex differences in jealousy and personality differences: Comparing con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The Relationship between Erectile Dysfunction, Sexual Self Efficacy an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Happiness Singled Out: Bidirectional Associations Between Singlehood a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  24. Personality Predictors of Prejudicial Attitudes, Willingness to Engage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Is Infidelity Contagious? Online Exposure to Norms of Adultery and Its...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. ‘It’s my definition of a relationship, even though it doesn’t fit your...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Analysis of the Experiences of Polyamorists in Spain
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. An Analysis of Sex Practices and Behaviors Among African Americans in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Motivation of non-monogamous adults to engage in sex with their differ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Temptation at your door: Receiving mate poaching attempts and perceive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy predicted by sociosexual beha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Les représentations de la non-monogamie consensuelle : perceptions des...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. The other side of the coin: A narrative inquiry into the positive cons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Attitudes Toward and Willingness to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Perceptions of monogamy, nonconsensual nonmonogamy and consensual nonm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. They must be sick: consensual nonmonogamy through the eyes of psychoth...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Consensual Non-monogamy from a Developmental Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. U.S. Family Law Along the Slippery Slope: the limits of a sexual right...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Differences in Motivation to Engage in Sexual Activity Between People ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Unspoken, yet understood: Exploring how couples communicate their excl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Exploring Variations in North American Adults’ Attitudes, Interest, Ex...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. What Drives the Dehumanization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Does “Open” Rhyme with “Special”? Comparing Personality, Sexual Satisf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Are there “Better” and “Worse” Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Exploring Minority Stress and Resilience in a Polyamorous Sample
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Stories Told Together: Male Narratives of Non-Monogamous Bi+ and Heter...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Consensual Non-Monogamy Among Kink-Identified Adults: Characteristics,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Sameness and Difference in Psychological Research on Consensually Non-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. (De)Politicizing Polyamory: Social Media Comments on Media Representat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s Definitions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Sexual Agreements Among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities Assigned Ma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a Natio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. A Prospective Investigation of the Decision to Open Up a Romantic Rela...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. A dyadic examination of self-determined sexual motives, need fulfillme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Caregivers’ Perceptions and Responses to a New Norm: The Missing Link ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Robo-Friend: Can a Social Robot Empathize with Your Feelings Effective...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Enjeux du dévoilement aux enfants pour les parents investis dans des r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Beyond the Dyad: a Review of the Novel Insights Gained From Studying C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Fatherhood Is Associated with Increased Infidelity and Moderates the L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Perceived Stigmatization and Disclosure among Individuals in Consensua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Monogamy as Public Policy for STD Prevention: In Theory and in Practic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Polyamory Is Deviant – But Not for the Reasons You May Think
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Self‐reported Big Five personality traits of individuals...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Individual and Relationship Predictors of Couple-Level Sexual Concurre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. A Decade Review of Sex and Partnering in Adolescence and Young Adultho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Counting polyamorists who count: Prevalence and definitions of an unde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Life History and Multi-Partner Mating: A Novel Explanation for Moral S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Relationship quality and comfort talking about sex as predictors of se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Relationship quality among young gay and bisexual men in consensual no...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Walk the Line: How Successful Are Efforts to Maintain Monogamy in Inti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Open Relationship Prevalence, Characteristics, and Correlates in a Nat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Sexual need fulfillment and satisfaction in consensually nonmonogamous...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Expanding Statistical Frontiers in Sexual Science: Taxometric, Invaria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. The good, the bad, and the ugly: Lay attitudes and perceptions of poly...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Eroticism Versus Nurturance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Providing Relationship Interventions to Same-Sex Couples: Clinical Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. ‘My partner was just all over her’: jealousy, communication and rules ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Attachment in Adulthood: Recent Developments, Emerging Debates, and Fu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Moving Past the Rose-Tinted Lens of Monogamy: Onward with Critical Sel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Which Partners Are More Human? Monogamy Matters More than Sexual Orien...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Passion, Intimacy, and Commitment in Casual Sexual Relationships in a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Mononormativity, Polypride, and the “Mono–Poly Wars”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Porn fans as sex tourists? Broadening meanings of sexual consumption a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and Monogamy Among U.S....
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Dimming the “Halo” Around Monogamy: Re-assessing Stigma Surrounding Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Social Monogamy in Nonhuman Primates: Phylogeny, Phenotype, and Physio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. What Theories and Methods From Relationship Research Can Contribute to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Ain’t misbehavin? Monogamy maintenance strategies in heterosexual roma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Reasons for sex and relational outcomes in consensually nonmonogamous ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. The Fragile Spell of Desire: A Functional Perspective on Changes in Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  96. “My mind kept creeping back… this relationship can’t last”: Developing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Moral judgment toward relationship betrayals and those who commit them
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Beyond the non/monogamy system: fluidity, hybridity, and transcendence...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Seksuologie: een inleidend overzicht
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Een interpersoonlijk perspectief op seksualiteit: over relaties en sek...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Willingness to Engage in Consensual Nonmonogamy Among Emerging Adults:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Caught in a “Bad Romance”? Reconsidering the Negative Association Betw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Personality Correlates of Desire to Engage in Consensual Non-monogamy ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Brief Report: Who has a Sexual Agreement Among Mixed-Sex Partnered Adu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. I Love You, and You, and You Too...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Estimates and Correlates of Engagement in Consensually Non-Monogamous ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Has the American Public’s Interest in Information Related to Relations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. The construct of sexual openness for females in steady intimate relati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Testing the Validity and Factor Structure of the Willingness to Engage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Couples Exploring Nonmonogamy: Guidelines for Therapists
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Sex Positivity and Counseling Psychology: An Introduction to the Major...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Wanting ‘the whole loaf’: zero-sum thinking about love is associated w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  117. Examining relationship quality across three types of relationship agre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy: Alternative Approaches to Pur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Unique and Shared Relationship Benefits of Consensually Non-Monog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. A Review and Critique of Research on Same-Sex Parenting and Adoption
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  122. Monogamy and Nonmonogamy: Evolutionary Considerations and Treatment Ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. When Sex and Power Collide: An Argument for Critical Sexuality Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. Why people defend relationship ideology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Le relazioni poliamorose: un'analisi del fenomeno
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Three’s a crowd: public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Monogamy, the Protective Fallacy: Sexual versus Emotional Exclusivity ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. Introduction to the Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationsh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. Unweaving the Rainbow of Human Sexuality: A Review of One-Night Stands...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. The Science of Female Orgasms: Pleasing Female Partners in Casual and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. Pair-Bonded Relationships and Romantic Alternatives
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. The Perceived Satisfaction Derived From Various Relationship Configura...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Sexual similarity, complementarity, accuracy, and overperception in sa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Maybe “I Do,” Maybe I Don't: Respectability Politics in the Same‐Sex M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Qual...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. There’s Jealousy…and Then There’s Jealousy: Differential Effects of Je...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but no...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Monogamy Agreements in Male Same-Sex Couples: Associations With Relati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. Monogamy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Same-Sex Marriage and the Boundaries of Diversity: Will Marriage and F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. Understanding sexuality: implications of Rubin for relationship resear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. Love and sex: polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Sexual Kindred Spirits...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  146. Place and Sexual Partnership Transition Among Young American Indian an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. Touch attitudes in cross-sex friendships: We're just friends
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. Extradyadic Involvement and Relationship Dissolution in Heterosexual W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxyg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. More Oxygen Please!: How Polyamorous Relationship Strategies Might Oxy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. Stigma Toward Individuals Engaged in Consensual Nonmonogamy: Robust an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Beyond “Oxytocin = Good”: Neural Complexities and the Flipside of Soci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. The Psychology of the Pair-Bond: Past and Future Contributions of Clos...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  154. Historical, Biological, Social, Cultural, and Psychological Aspects of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text