In this article, we develop an account of how aesthetic preferences can be formed as a result of two hierarchical, fluency-based processes. Our model suggests that processing performed immediately upon encountering an aesthetic object is stimulus driven, and aesthetic preferences that accrue from this processing reflect aesthetic evaluations of pleasure or displeasure. When sufficient processing motivation is provided by a perceiver’s need for cognitive enrichment and/or the stimulus’ processing affordance, elaborate perceiver-driven processing can emerge, which gives rise to fluency-based aesthetic evaluations of interest, boredom, or confusion. Because the positive outcomes in our model are pleasure and interest, we call it the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking (PIA Model). Theoretically, this model integrates a dual-process perspective and ideas from lay epistemology into processing fluency theory, and it provides a parsimonious framework to embed and unite a wealth of aesthetic phenomena, including contradictory preference patterns for easy versus difficult-to-process aesthetic stimuli.

Albrecht, S., Carbon, C. C. (2014). The Fluency Amplification Model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 148, 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 437-442. doi:10.1177/0963721413498894
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N. (2013). Disfluency prompts analytic thinking—But not always greater accuracy: Response to Thompson et al. (2013). Cognition, 128, 252-255. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.006
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Armstrong, T., Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12, 305-329. doi:10.1037/a0012558
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181-199. doi:10.2307/1423027
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer, R. S., Srull, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0005
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bargh, J. A., Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Belke, B., Leder, H., Augustin, M. D. (2006). Mastering style—Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48, 115-134. Retrieved from http://www.pabst-publishers.de/psychology-science/2-2006/04_belke.pdf
Google Scholar
Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 214-222. doi:10.1037/a0019648
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 279-286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Google Scholar
Blijlevens, J., Carbon, C. C., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L. (2012). Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 44-57. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bornstein, R. F., D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128. doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bornstein, R. F., Kale, A. R., Cornell, K. R. (1990). Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 791-800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.791
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bullot, N. J., Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 123-137. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000489
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Carbon, C. C., Faerber, S. J., Gerger, G., Forster, M., Leder, H. (2013). Innovation is appreciated when we feel safe: On the situational dependence of the appreciation of innovation. International Journal of Design, 7(2), 43-51. Retrieved from http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/index
Google Scholar
Carbon, C. C., Leder, H. (2005). The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET): A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 587-601. doi:10.1002/acp.1098
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241-261. doi:10.1080/02699930302294
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., Herman, C. P. (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harcourt.
Google Scholar
Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177-188. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)00014-w
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., Wänke, M. (2009). Mix me a list: Context moderates the truth effect and the mere-exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1117-1122. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.019
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49. doi:10.1177/1088868307304092
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Derryberry, D., Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In Niedenthal, P. M., Kitayama, S. (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Devine, P. G., Tauer, J. M., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., Vance, K. M. (1999). Moving beyond attitude change in the study of dissonance-related processes. In Harmon-Jones, E., Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 297-323). Washington, DC: American Psychologist Association. doi:10.1037/10318-012
Google Scholar | Crossref
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Google Scholar | Crossref
Efklides, A., Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415-431. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.010
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 378-395. doi:10.3758/BF03193858
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Evans, J. S. B. T., Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Faerber, S. J., Leder, H., Gerger, G., Carbon, C. C. (2010). Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica, 135, 191-200. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.006
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik [Introduction to aesthetics]. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf & Härtel.
Google Scholar
Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288-307. doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0447
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fiedler, K. (2013). Fluency and behavior regulation. Adaptive and maladaptive consequences of a good feeling. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 234-254). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Forster, M., Leder, H., Ansorge, U. (2013). It felt fluent and I liked it: Subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking. Emotion, 13, 280-289. doi:10.1037/a0030115
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gawronski, B., Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual process theories. In Carlston, D. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282-312). Washington, DC: American Psychologist Association. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0014
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1979)
Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In Uleman, J. S., Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Greifeneder, R., Unkelbach, C. (2013). Experiencing thinking. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Halberstadt, J. (2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 166-183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_5
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Hansen, J., Wänke, M. (2013). Fluency in context: Discrepancy makes processing experiences informative. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 70-84). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes. In Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R., Bem, S. (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 185-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Harmon-Jones, E., Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual difference approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889-898. doi:10.1177/0146167201277011
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., van Wieringen, P. C. W. (2003). “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 111-124. doi:10.1348/000712603762842147
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Janiszewski, C. (1993). Preattentive mere exposure effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 376-392. doi:10.1086/209356
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovichz, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kant, I. (1951). Critique of judgment (Bernard, J. H. , Trans.). New York, NY: Hafner Press. (Original work published 1790)
Google Scholar
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.4.609
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181-197. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0103_1
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263-283. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558. doi:10.1126/science.7352271
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Landwehr, J. R., Labroo, A. A., Herrmann, A. (2011). Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Science, 30, 416-429. doi:10.1287/mksc.1110.0633
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Landwehr, J. R., Wentzel, D., Herrmann, A. (2013). Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 92-107. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0286
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Larsen, R. J., Kasimatis, M., Frey, K. (1992). Facilitating the furrowed brow: An unobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis applied to unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 321-338. doi:10.1080/02699939208409689
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176-198. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Losch, M. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changed to reduce negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289-304. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90040-S
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Martindale, C., Moore, K., Borkum, J. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psycho-biological theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53-80. doi:10.2307/1423259
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mazzoni, G., Nelson, T. O. (1998). Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
McWhinnie, H. J. (1968). A review of research on aesthetic measure. Acta Psychologica, 28, 363-375. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(68)90025-5
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Metcalfe, J., Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Miller, R. L. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 229-233. doi:10.1086/268290
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320-329. doi:10.1037//1528-3542.1.3.320-329
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Munsinger, H., Kessen, W. (1964). Uncertainty, structure, and preference. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78(9), 1-24. doi:10.1037/h0093865
Google Scholar | Crossref
Murphy, S. T., Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Muth, C., Carbon, C. C. (2013). The Aesthetic Aha: On the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144, 25-30. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Muth, C., Pepperell, R., Carbon, C. C. (2013). Give me gestalt! Preference for cubist artworks revealing high detectability of objects. Leonardo, 46, 488-489. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_00649
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Oppenheimer, D. M., Alter, A. L. (2013). Disfluency sleeper effect: Disfluency today promotes fluency tomorrow. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 85-97). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77-107. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reber, R. (2002). Reasons for the preference for symmetry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 415-416. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02350076
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reber, R. (2012). Processing fluency, aesthetic pleasure, and culturally shared taste. In Shimamura, A. P., Palmer, S. E. (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 223-274). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.001.0001
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Reber, R., Wurtz, P., Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 47-60. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 99-110. doi:10.1348/000712603762842138
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schwarz, N., Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schwarz, N., Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Shimamura, A. P. (2012). Toward a science of aesthetics: Issues and ideas. In Shimamura, A. P., Palmer, S. E. (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 3-28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.003.0010
Google Scholar | Crossref
Silvia, P. J. (2005a). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119-133. doi:10.2190/12AV-AH2P-MCEH-289E
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Silvia, P. J. (2005b). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9, 342-357. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Silvia, P. J. (2005c). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5, 89-102. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 75-80. doi:10.1037/a0017081
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Silvia, P. J. (2012). Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In Shimamura, A. P., Palmer, S. E. (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 251-275). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.003.0058
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smith, E. R., DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Song, H., Schwarz, N. (2008). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986-988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Strack, F., Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., Pennycook, G., Ball, L. J., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., Ackerman, R. (2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytical thinking. Cognition, 128, 237-251. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 260-271. doi:10.1080/02699930801994112
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Topolinski, S., Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402-405. doi:10.1177/0963721410388803
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Topolinski, S., Strack, F. (2009). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1465-1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (2013a). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (2013b). Thinking about “experiences of thinking”: Fluency in six principles. In Unkelbach, C., Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 257-261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Van de Cruys, S., Wagemans, J. (2011). Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art. i-Perception, 2, 1035-1062. doi:10.1068/i0466aap
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Van den Bergh, O., Vrana, S. R. (1998). Repetition and boredom in a perceptual fluency/attributional model of affective judgements. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 533-553. doi:10.1080/026999398379556
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547-565. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Winkielman, P., Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799-806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In Musch, J., Klauer, K. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Wurtz, P., Reber, R., Zimmermann, T. D. (2008). The feeling of fluent perception: A single experience from multiple asynchronous sources. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 171-184. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.001
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

PSR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $257.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top