Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published October 2000

A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns

Abstract

The fear appeal literature is examined in a comprehensive synthesis using meta-analytical techniques. The meta-analysis suggests that strong fear appeals produce high levels of perceived severity and susceptibility, and are more persuasive than low or weak fear appeals. The results also indicate that fear appeals motivate adaptive danger control actions such as message acceptance and maladaptive fear control actions such as defensive avoidance or reactance. It appears that strong fear appeals and high-efficacy messages produce the greatest behavior change, whereas strong fear appeals with low-efficacy messages produce the greatest levels of defensive responses. Future directions and practical implications are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Finckenauer JO: Scared Straight and the Panacea Phenomenon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1982.
2. Covello V, von Winterfeldt D, Slovic P: Risk communication: A review of the literature. Risk Abstracts 3:171-182, 1986.
3. Geller ES: Using television to promote safety belt use, in Rice RE, Atkin CK (eds.): Public Communication Campaigns. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1989, pp. 201-203.
4. Witte K: Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Comm Monographs 59:329-349, 1992.
5. Witte K: Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures, in Andersen PA, Guerrero LK (eds.): The Handbook of Communication and Emotion. New York, Academic Press, 1998, pp. 423-450.
6. Dillard JP: Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Comm Theory 4:295-323, 1994.
7. Sutton SR: Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research, in Eiser JR (ed.): Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. London, Wiley, 1982, pp. 303-337.
8. Boster FJ, Mongeau P: Fear-arousing persuasive messages, in Bostrom RN, Westley BH (eds.): Communication Yearbook 8. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1984, pp. 330-375.
9. Mongeau P: Another look at fear arousing messages, in Allen M, Preiss R (eds.): Persuasion: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press, 1998, pp. 53-68.
10. Rogers RW: A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psych 91:93-114, 1975.
11. Rogers RW: Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation, in Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds.): Social Psychophysiology. New York, Guilford Press, 1983, pp. 153-176.
12. Higbee KL: Fifteen years of fear arousal: Research on threat appeals: 1953-1968. Psych Bull 6:426-444, 1969.
13. Miller GR: Studies on the use of fear appeals: A summary and analysis. Central States Speech J 14:117-125, 1963.
14. Ray ML, Wilkie WL: Fear: The potential of an appeal neglected by marketing. J Marketing 34:54-62, 1970.
15. Sternthal B, Craig CS: Fear appeals: Revisited and revised. J Consumer Res 1:22-34, 1974.
16. Hale JL, Dillard JP: Fear appeals in health campaigns: Too much, too little, or just right? in Maibach E, Parrott RL (eds.): Designing Health Messages. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1995, pp. 65-80.
17. Job RFS: Effective and ineffective use of fear in health promotion campaigns. Am J Public Health 78:163-167, 1988.
18. Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW: Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health Educ Res 1:153-161, 1986.
19.Hovland C, Janis I, Kelly H: Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1953.
20. Janis IL: Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research, in Berkowitz L (ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 3). New York, Academic Press, 1967, pp. 166-225.
21. McGuire WJ: Personality and susceptibility to social influence, in Borgatta E, Lambert W (eds.): Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago, Rand McNally, 1968, pp. 1130-1187.
22. McGuire WJ: The nature of attitudes and attitude change, in Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds.): The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 3). Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1969, pp. 136-314.
23. Beck KH, Frankel A: A conceptualization of threat communications and protective health behavior. Social Psych Q 44:204-217, 1981.
24. Giesen M, Hendrick C: Effects of false positive and negative arousal feedback on persuasion. J Personality Social Psych 4:449-457, 1974.
25. Hendrick C, Giesen M, Borden R: False physiological feedback and persuasion: Effect of fear arousal vs. fear reduction on attitude change. J Personality 43:196-214, 1975.
26. Mewborn CR, Rogers RW: Effects of threatening and reassuring components of fear appeals on physiological and verbal measures of emotion and attitudes. J Exp Social Psych 15:242-253, 1979.
27. Leventhal H: Findings and theory in the study of fear communications, in Berkowitz L (ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 5). New York, Academic Press, 1970, pp. 119-186.
28. Rogers RW: Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals. Psych Rep 56:179-182, 1985.
29. Kleinot MC, Rogers RW: Identifying effective components of alcohol misuse prevention programs. J Stud Alcohol 43:802-811, 1982.
30. Maddux JE, Rogers RW: Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Social Psych 19:469-479, 1983.
31. Mulilis JP, Lippa R: Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: A test of protection motivation theory. J Appl Social Psych 20:619-638, 1990.
32. Rogers RW, Mewborn CR: Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat’s noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of the coping responses. J Personality Social Psych 34:54-61, 1976.
33. Wurtele SK, Maddux JE: Relative contributions of protection motivation theory components in predicting exercise intentions and behavior. Health Psych 6:453-466, 1987.
34. Sutton SR, Eiser JR: The effects of fear-arousing communications on cigarette smoking: An expectancy-value approach. J Behav Med 7:13-33, 1984.
35. Sutton SR, Hallett R: Understanding the effects of fear-arousing communications: The role of cognitive factors and amount of fear aroused. J Behav Med 11:353-360, 1988.
36. Sutton SR, Hallett R: The contribution of fear and cognitive factors in mediating the effects of fear-arousing communications. Social Behav 4:83-98, 1989.
37. Sutton SR, Hallett R: Understanding seat-belt intentions and behavior: A decision-making approach. J Appl Social Psych 19:1310-1325, 1989.
38. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL: Methods of Meta-Analysis. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
39. Alvaro EM, Burgoon M: Individual differences in responses to social influence attempts: Theory and research on the effects of misanthropy. Comm Res 22:347-384, 1995.
40. Ben-Sira Z: Latent fear-arousing potential of fear-moderating and fear-neutral health promoting information. Social Sci Med 15:105-112, 1981.
41. Kline K: Applying Witte’s Extended Parallel Process Model to Pamphlets Urging Women to Engage in BSE: Where Are the Efficacy Messages? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX, 1995.
42. Ragsdale J, Durham K: Audience response to religious fear appeals. Rev Religious Res 28:40-50, 1986.
43. Wolf S, Gregory WL, Stephan WG: Protection motivation theory: Prediction of intentions to engage in anti-nuclear war behaviors. J Appl Social Psych 16:310-321, 1986.
44. Harris VA, Jellison JM: Fear-arousing communications, false physiological feedback, and the acceptance of recommendations. J Exp Social Psych 7:269-279, 1971.
45. Horowitz IA: Attitude change as a function of perceived arousal. J Social Psych 87:117-126, 1972.
46. Beck KH: The effects of positive and negative arousal upon attitudes, belief acceptance, behavioral intention, behavior. J Social Psych 107:239-251, 1979.
47. Boyle GJ: Effects of viewing a road trauma film on emotional and motivational factors. Accident Analysis Prev 16:383-386, 1984.
48. Burnett JJ, Oliver RL: Fear appeal effects in the field: A segmentation approach. J Marketing Res 16:181-190, 1979.
49. Hale JL, Mongeau PA, Lemieux R: Trait Anxiety and Fear-Arousing Messages Regarding Sun Exposure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL, 1993.
50. McCrosky JC, Wright DW: A comparison of the effects of punishment-oriented and reward-oriented messages in persuasive communications. J Comm 21:83-93, 1971.
51. Powell FA, Miller GR: Social approval and disapproval cues in anxiety-arousing communications. Speech Monographs 34:152-159, 1967.
52. Stephenson MT, Witte K: Fear, threat, and perceptions of efficacy from frightening skin cancer messages. Public Health Rev 26:147-174.
53. Wheatley J, Oshikawa S: The relationship between anxiety and positive and negative advertising appeals. J Marketing Res 7:85-89, 1970.
54. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S: The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Personality Social Psych 52:500-510, 1987.
55. Moltz H, Thislethwaite DL: Attitude modification and anxiety reduction. J Abnormal Social Psych 50:231-237, 1955.
56. Witte K, Cameron KA, McKeon J, Berkowitz JM: Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. J Health Comm 1:317-341, 1996.
57. Witte K, Morrison K: Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals’ reactions to fear appeals. Western J Comm 64:1-29, 2000.
58. Witte K: Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Comm Monographs 61:113-134, 1994.
59. Smalec J: Bulimia Interventions via Interpersonal Influence: The Role of Threat and Efficacy in Persuading Bulimics to Seek Help. J Behav Med 1:37-57, 2000
60. Insko CA, Arkoff A, Insko VM: Effects of high and low fear-arousing communications upon opinions toward smoking. J Exp Social Psych 1:256-266, 1965.
61. Kirscht JP, Becker MH, Haefner DP, Maiman LA: Effects of threatening communications and mothers’ health beliefs on weight change in obese children. J Behav Med 1:147-157, 1978.
62. Leventhal H, Jones S, Trembly G: Sex differences in attitude and behavior change under conditions of fear and specific instructions. J Exp Social Psych 2:387-399, 1996.
63. Rhodes P, Wolitski RJ: Perceived effectiveness of fear appeals in AIDS education: Relationship to ethnicity, gender, age, and group membership. AIDS Educ Prev 2:1-11, 1990.
64. Stout PA, Sego T: The Role of Need for Cognition in Response to Threat Appeals in AIDS Messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, 1994.
65. Brouwers MC, Sorrentino RM: Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: The role of individual differences in health compliance. J Personality Social Psych 65:102-112, 1993.
66. Burnett JJ: Internal-external locus of control as a moderator of fear appeals. J Appl Psych 66:390-393, 1981.
67. Horowitz IA: Effects of volunteering, fear arousal, and number of communications on attitude change. J Personality Social Psych 11:34-37, 1969.
68. Horowitz IA, Gumenik WE: Effects of the volunteer subject, choice, and fear arousal on attitude change. J Exp Social Psych 6:293-303, 1970.
69. Dillard JP, Plotnick CA, Godbold LC, Freimuth VS, Edgar T: The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Comm Res 23:44-72, 1996.
70. Kirscht JP, Haefner DP: Effects of repeated threatening health communications. Int J Health Educ 16:268-277, 1973.
71. Kohn PM, Goodstadt MS, Cook GM, Sheppard M, Chan G: Ineffectiveness of threat appeals about drinking and driving. Accident Analysis Prev 14:457-464, 1982.
72. LaTour MS, Pitts RE: Using fear appeals in advertising for AIDS prevention in the college-age population. J Health Care Marketing 9:5-14, 1989.
73. Leventhal H, Trembly G: Negative emotions and persuasion. J Personality 36:154-168, 1968.
74. Chaiken S: Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Personality Social Psych 39:752-766, 1980.
75. Chaiken S: The heuristic model of persuasion, in Zanna MP, Olson JM, Herman CP (eds.): Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987, pp. 3-39.
76. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, in Berkowitz L (ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19). New York, Academic Press, 1986, pp. 123-205.
77. Liberman A, Chaiken S: Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality Social Psych Bull 18:669-679, 1992.
78. Hale JL, Lemieux R, Mongeau PA: Cognitive processing of fear-arousing message content. Comm Res 22:459-474, 1995.
79. Jepson C, Chaiken S: Chronic issue-specific fear inhibits systematic processing of persuasive communications. J Social Behav Personality 5:61-84, 1990.
80. Gleicher F, Petty RE: Expectations of reassurance influence the nature of fear-stimulated attitude change. J Exp Social Psych 28:86-100, 1992.
81. Bang HK: The Effectiveness of the Use of Fear Appeals Depicting Legal and Physical Consequences in Anti-Drunk Driving Television Public Service Announcements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1993.
82. Beach RI: The effect of a “fear-arousing” safety film on physiological, attitudinal, and behavioral measures: A pilot study. Res Rev 53-57, 1956.
83. Beck KH, Davis CM: Effects of fear-arousing communications and topic importance on attitude change. J Social Psych 104:81-95, 1978.
84. Beck KH, Lund AK: The effects of health threat seriousness and personal efficacy upon intentions and behavior. J Appl Social Psych 11:401-405, 1981.
85. Beck KH: The effects of risk probability, outcome severity, efficacy of protection and access to protection on decision making: A further test of Protection Motivation Theory. Social Behav Personality 12:121-125, 1984.
86. Berkowitz L, Cottingham DR: The interest value and relevance of fear arousing communications. J Abnormal Social Psych 1:37-43, 1960.
87. Boer H, Seydel E: Protection motivation theory, in Connor M, Norman P (eds.): Predicting Health Behavior: Research and Practice With Social Cognition Models Buckingham, PA, Open University Press, 1996, pp. 95-120.
88. Brown RA: Fear-induced attitude change as a function of conformity and drinking pattern in alcoholics. J Clin Psych 35:454-456, 1979.
89. Calantone RJ, Warshaw PR: Negating the effects of fear appeals in election campaigns. J Appl Psych 70:627-633, 1985.
90. Carey JC: The Influence of Involvement on Cognitive and Emotional Responses to Fear Appeals. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1990.
91. Chang JL: Emotional Response and the Use of Threat Appeals. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1989.
92. Chu GC: Fear arousal, efficacy, and imminency. J Personality Social Psych 4:517-524, 1966.
93. Dabbs JM, Leventhal H: Effects of varying the recommendations in a fear-arousing communication. J Personality Social Psych 4:525-531, 1966.
94. Dembroski TM, Lasater TM, Ramirez A: Communicator similarity, fear arousing communications, and compliance with health care recommendations. J Appl Social Psych 8:254-269, 1978.
95. DeWolfe G: Fear and attitude change. J Abnormal Social Psych 69:119-123, 1964.
96. Dziokonski W, Weber SJ: Repression-sensitization, perceived vulnerability, and the fear appeal communication. J Social Psych 102:105-112, 1977.
97. Evans RI, Rozelle RM, Lasater TM, Dembroski TM, Allen BP: Fear arousal, persuasion, and actual versus implied behavioral change: New perspective utilizing a real-life dental hygiene program. J Personality Social Psych 2:220-227, 1970.
98. Frandsen KD: Effects of threat appeals and media of transmission. Speech Monographs 30:101-104, 1963.
99. Fritzen RD, Mazer GE: The effects of fear appeal and communication upon attitudes toward alcohol consumption. J Drug Educ 5:171-181, 1975.
100. Fruin DJ, Pratt C, Owen N: Protection motivation and adolescents’ perceptions of exercise. J Abnormal Social Psych 22:55-69, 1992.
101. Goldstein MJ: The relationship between coping and avoiding behavior and response to fear-arousing propaganda. J Abnormal Social Psych 58:247-252, 1959.
102. Griffeth RW, Rogers RW: Effects of fear-arousing components of driver education on students’ safety attitudes and simulator performance. J Educ Psych 68:501-506, 1976.
103. Haefner DP: Arousing fear in dental health education. J Public Health Dentistry 25:140-146, 1965.
104. Hass JW, Bagley GS, Rogers RW: Coping with the energy crisis: Effects of fear appeals upon attitudes toward energy consumption. J Appl Psych 60:754-756, 1975.
105. Hill D, Gardner G: Repression-sensitization and yielding to threatening health communications. Aus J Psych 32:183-193, 1980.
106. Janis IL, Feshbach S: Effects of fear-arousing communications. J Abnormal Social Psych 48:78-92, 1953.
107. Janis IL, Feshbach S: Personality differences associated with responsiveness to fear-arousing communications. J Personality 23:154-166, 1954.
108. Janis IL, Terwilliger RF: An experimental study of psychological resistance to fear arousing communications. J Abnormal Social Psych 65:403-410, 1962.
109. Kantola SJ, Syme G, Nesdale AR: The effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation: An informational analysis. J Appl Social Psych 13:164-182, 1983.
110. Keesling BJ, Friedman H: Interventions to Prevent Skin Cancer: Experimental Evaluation of Informational and Fear Appeals. Unpublished manuscript, 1991.
111. Kendall C, Hailey B: The relative effectiveness of three reminder letters on making and keeping mammogram appointments. Behav Med 19:29-34, 1993.
112. Klohn LS, Rogers RW: Dimensions of the severity of a health threat: The persuasive effects of visibility, time of onset, and rate of onset on young women’s intentions to prevent osteoporosis. Health Psych 10:323-329, 1991.
113. Krisher HP III, Darley SA, Darley JM: Fear-provoking recommendations, intentions to take preventive actions, and actual preventive actions. J Personality Social Psych 26:301-308, 1973.
114. LaTour M, Snipes R, Bliss S: Don’t be afraid to use fear appeals: An experimental study. J Advertising Res 28:59-67, 1996.
115. Lemieux R, Hale J, Mongeau P: Reducing Risk Behaviors Related to Sun Exposure: The Effects of Fear Appeals, Vividness, and Message Framing. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Chicago, 1995.
116. Leventhal H, Niles P: A field experiment on fear arousal with data on the validity of questionnaire measures. J Personality 32:459-479, 1964.
117. Leventhal H, Singer R, Jones S: Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. J Personality Social Psych 2:20-29, 1965.
118. Leventhal H, Watts J: Sources of resistance to fear-arousing communications on smoking and lung cancer. J Personality 34:155-175, 1966.
119. Leventhal H, Watts J, Pagano F: Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger. J Personality Social Psych 3:313-321, 1967.
120. Powell FA: The effect of anxiety-arousing messages when related to personal, familial, and impersonal referents. Speech Monographs 32:102-106, 1965.
121. Radelfinger S: Some effects of fear-arousing communications on preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monographs 19:2-15, 1965.
122. Ramirez A, Lasater TL: Attitudinal and behavioral reactions to fear-arousing communications. Psych Rep 38:811-818, 1976.
123. Ramirez A, Lasater TL: Ethnicity of communicator, self-esteem, and reactions to fear-arousing communications. J Social Psych 102:79-91, 1977.
124. Rippetoe PA, Rogers RW: Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. J Personality Social Psych 52:596-604, 1987.
125. Rodriguez JI: Confounds in Fear Arousing Persuasive Messages: Do the Paths Less Traveled Make All the Difference? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1995.
126. Rogers RW, Thislethwaite DL: Effects of fear arousal and reassurance on attitude change. J Personality Social Psych 15:227-233, 1970.
127. Rogers RW, Deckner CW: Effects of fear appeals and physiological arousal upon emotion, attitudes, and cigarette smoking. J Personality Social Psych 32:222-230, 1975.
128. Rosen TJ, Terry NS, Leventhal H: The role of esteem and coping in response to a threat communication. J Res Personality 16:90-107, 1982.
129. Roser C, Thompson M: Fear appeals and the formation of active publics. J Comm 45:103-121, 1995.
130. Self CA, Rogers RW: Coping with threats to health: Effects of persuasive appeals on depressed, normal, and antisocial personalities. J Behav Med 13:343-357, 1990.
131. Shelton ML, Rogers RW: Fear-arousing and empathy-arousing appeals to help: The pathos of persuasion. J Appl Social Psych 11:366-378, 1981.
132. Siero S, Kok G, Pruyn J: Effects of public education about breast cancer and breast self-examination. Social Sci Med 18:881-888, 1984.
133. Skilbeck C, Tulips J, Ley J: The effects of fear arousal, fear position, fear exposure, and sidedness on compliance with dietary instructions. Eur J Social Psych 7:221-239, 1977.
134. Smart RG, Fejer D: The effects of high and low fear messages about drugs. J Drug Educ 4:225-235, 1974.
135. Smith MJ: The effects of threat to attitudinal freedom as a function of message quality and initial receiver attitude. Comm Monographs 44:196-206, 1977.
136. Stainback R, Rogers RW: Identifying effective components of alcohol abuse prevention programs: Effects of fear appeals, message style, and source expertise. Int J Addict 18:393-405, 1983.
137. Stanley MA, Maddux JE: Cognitive processes in health enhancement: Investigation of a combined protection motivation and self-efficacy model. Basic Appl Social Psych 7:101-113, 1986.
138. Stout P, Sego T: Emotions elicited by threat appeals and their impact on persuasion, in King K (ed.): The Proceedings of the 1994 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Athens, GA, American Academy of Advertising, 1994, pp. 8-16.
139. Stout P, Sego T: Response to threat appeals in public service announcements, in Madden C (ed.): The Proceedings of the 1995 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Athens, GA, American Academy of Advertising, 1995, pp. 78-86.
140. Struckman-Johnson CJ, Gilliland RC, Struckman-Johnson DL, North TC: The effects of fear of AIDS and gender on responses to fear-arousing condom advertisements. J Appl Social Psych 20:1396-1410, 1990.
141. Sturges J, Rogers RW: Preventive health psychology from a developmental perspective: An extension of protection motivation theory. Health Psych 15:158-166, 1996.
142. Tanner JF, Day E, Crask MR: Protection motivation theory: An extension of fear appeals theory in communication. J Business Res 19:267-276, 1989.
143. Tanner JF, Hunt JB, Eppright DR: The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. J Marketing 55:36-45, 1991.
144. Van der Velde FW, Van der Pligt J: AIDS-related behavior: Coping, protection motivation, and previous behavior. J Behav Med 14:429-451, 1991.
145. Walsh DC, Hingson RW, Merrigan DM, Levenson SM, Coffman GA, Heeren T: The impact of a physician’s warning on recovery after alcoholism treatment. JAMA 267:663-667, 1992.
146. Watson M, Pettingale KW, Goldstein D: Effects of fear appeal on arousal, self-reported anxiety, and attitude towards smoking. Psych Rep 52:139-146, 1983.
147. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Roberts NE: Determinants of self-protective behavior: Home radon testing. J Appl Social Psych 20:783-801, 1990.
148. Witte K, Morrison K: The use of scare tactics in AIDS prevention: The case of juvenile detention and high school youth. J Appl Comm Res 23:128-142, 1995.
149. Witte K, Berkowitz J, Cameron KA, Lillie J: Preventing the spread of genital warts: Using fear appeals to promote self-protective behaviors. Health Educ Behav 25:571-585, 1998.
150. Wurtele S: Increasing women’s calcium intake: The role of health beliefs, intentions, and health value. J Appl Social Psych 18:627-639, 1988.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: October 2000
Issue published: October 2000

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 11009129

Authors

Affiliations

Kim Witte, PhD
Department of Communication, Michigan State University[email protected]
Mike Allen, PhD
Department of Communication, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Health Education & Behavior.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 20703

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 1989 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 2141

  1. Belief-based predictors of portable pool safety behaviors among parents of young children
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Which unsafe riding behaviours are associated with traffic offences and crashes? A study of young Indonesian motorcyclists
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Experiences of immersive virtual reality in healthcare clinical training for nursing and allied health students: A mixed studies systematic review
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Public Health Communication Approaches for Building Common Ground
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. An audience segmentation study of native plant gardening behaviors in the United States
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Marketing and Smart Technologies
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. The convergence of GETAMEL and protection motivation theory: A study on augmented reality-based gamification adoption among science teachers
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brands as Social Justice Educators: How Social Media Brand Activism Influences Psychological Processing of Advertising Advocating Transgender Rights
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. How is adaptation intention shaped in urban Pakistan? A multigroup gender analysis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perceived infection risk, infection exposure, and compliance to infection control measures among the first COVID-19 patients in Norway
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle ScholarPub Med
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SOPHE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SOPHE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB