Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Review article
First published online December 20, 2011

Disclosure Antecedents in an Online Service Context: The Role of Sensitivity of Information

Abstract

The authors propose and find that the mixed results of prior research regarding disclosure antecedents are due in part to a failure to account for information sensitivity. Using prospect theory to examine willingness to disclose in an online service context, the authors propose and find that greater sensitivity of information requested produces weaker effects of customization benefits but stronger effects of information control and online privacy concern. The authors also find that customization benefits can overcome the negative effects of sensitive information requests when concern is lower or control is higher, and that perceived risk and firm trust are mechanisms through which disclosure antecedents operate. For theory, this research suggests that online disclosure models need to include sensitivity of information as a moderator. Moreover, the privacy paradox (consumers voice concerns but still disclose) may result from a failure to account for information sensitivity, since the authors find no effect of privacy concern on overall disclosure but find the predicted negative effect for higher sensitive information. For practice, our research suggests actionable strategies to aid online marketers in matching information requests with the needs and concerns of consumers by providing greater control and customization, enhancing firm trust, and adapting information requests to the situation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Alpert Sherman R., Karat John, Karat Clare-Marie, Brodie Carolyn, Vergo John G. (2003), “User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13 (4), 373–396.
Alwin Duane F., Tessler Richard C. (1985), “Causal Models, Unobserved Variables, and Experimental Data,” in Causal Models in Panel and Experimental Designs, Blalock H. M. ed. New York, NY: Aldine, 55–88.
Anderson James C., Gerbing David W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–423.
Anderson James C., Narus James A. (1984), “A Model of the Distributor’s Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 48 (Autumn), 62–74.
Andrade Eduardo B., Kaltcheva Velitchka, Weitz Barton (2002), “Self-Disclosure on the Web: The Impact of Privacy Policy, Reward, and Company Reputation,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Broniarczyk Susan M., Nakamoto Kent eds. Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 350–353.
Arnold Mark J., Reynolds Kristy E (2003), “Hedonic Shopping Motivations,” Journal of Retailing, 79 (2), 77–95.
Awad Naveen Farag, Krishnan M. D. (2006), “The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization,” MIS Quarterly, 30 (1), 13–28.
Basi Ramit K. (1999), “WWW Response Rates to Socio-Demographic Items,” Journal of the Market Research Society, 41 (4), 397–401.
Blalock Hubert M. Jr. (2009), Causal Models in Experimental Designs. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
Bollen Kenneth A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Burger Jerry M., Cooper Harris M. (1979), “The Desirability of Control,” Motivation and Emotion, 3 (4), 381–393.
Chatterjee Subimal, Heath Timothy B., Milberg Sandra J., France Karen R. (2000), “The Differential Processing of Price in Gains and Losses: The Effects of Frame and Need for Cognition,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (1), 61–75.
Chatterjee Subimal, Heath Timothy B. (1996), “Conflict and Loss Aversion in Multiattribute Choice: The Effects of Trade-off Size and Reference Dependence on Decision Difficulty,” Organizational Behavior and Decision Making Processes, 67 (2), 144–155.
Chellappa Ramnath K., Sin Raymond G. (2005), “Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma,” Information Technology and Management, 6 (2), 181–202.
Collier Joel E., Bienstock Carol C. (2006), “Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (3), 260–275.
Collins Nancy L., Miller Lynn C. (1994), “Self-Disclosure and Liking: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Psychological Bulletin, 116 (3), 457–475.
Cranor Lorrie F., Reagle Joseph, Ackerman Mark S. (1999), “Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users Attitudes about Online Privacy,” AT&T Labs-Research Technical Report TR 99.4.3.
Culnan Mary J., Milne George R. (2001), The Culnan-Milne Survey on Consumers and Online Privacy Notices. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/glb/supporting/culnan-milne.pdf (accessed January 10, 2010).
Culnan Mary J. (1993), “’How Did They Get My Name?’ An Exploratory Investigation of Consumer Attitudes Toward Secondary Information Use,” MIS Quarterly, 17 (September), 341–363.
Dholakia Uptal M., Gopinath Mahesh, Bagozzi Richard P. (2006), “The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (2), 163–175.
Dinev Tamara, Hart Paul (2006), “An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions,” Information Systems Research, 17 (1), 61–80.
Dolnicar Sara, Jordaan Yolanda (2007), “A Market-Oriented Approach to Responsibly Managing Information Privacy Concerns In Direct Marketing,” Journal of Advertising, 36 (2), 123–149.
Dommeyer Curt J., Cross Barbara (2003), “What Consumers Know and What They Do: An Investigation of Consumer Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Privacy Protection Strategies,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17 (2), 34–51.
Eagly Alice H., Chaiken Shelly (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Easton Geoff, Araujo Luis (1994), “Market Exchange, Social Structures and Time,” European Journal of Marketing, 28 (3), 72–84.
Fornell Claes, Larcker David F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
Hair Joseph F., Anderson Rolph E., Tatham Ronald L., Black William C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Horne Daniel R., Norberg Patricia A., Cemal Ekin A. (2007), “Exploring Consumer Lying in Information-Based Exchanges,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24 (2), 90–99.
Hui Kai-Lung, Teo Hock Hai, Lee Sang-Yong Tom (2007), “The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment,” MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 19–33.
Hui Kai-Lung, Tan Bernard C. Y., Goh Chyan-Yee (2006), “Online Information Disclosure: Motivators and Measurements,” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 6 (4), 415–441.
Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–291.
Levine Barry (2008), “Browser Wars Heat Up as Firefox Adds ‘Privacy Mode’,” Newsfactor.com, September 12.
Lwin May, Wirtz Jochen, Williams Jerome D. (2007), “Consumer Online Privacy Concerns and Responses: A Power-Responsibility Equilibrium Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (4), 572–585.
Malhotra Naresh K., Kim Sung S., Agarwal James (2004), “Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model,” Information Systems Research, 15 (4), 336–355.
Marsh Herbert W., Hocevar Dennis (1985), “Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept: First and Higher Order Factor Models and their Invarieance Across Groups,” Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 562–582.
Meinert David B., Peterson Dane K., Criswell John R., Crossland Martin D. (2006), “Privacy Policy Statements and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information,” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 4 (1), 1–17.
Metzger Miriam J. (2006), “Effects of Site, Vendor, and Consumer Characteristics on Web Site Trust and Disclosure,” Communication Research, 33 (3), 155–179.
Metzger Miriam J. (2004), “Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9 (4) http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/metzger.html (accessed April 5, 2011).
Mitchell Vincent-Wayne, Harris Greg (2005), “The Importance of Consumers’ Perceived Risk in Retail Strategy,” European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7/8), 821–837.
Miyazaki Anthony D., Fernandez Ana (2001), “Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35 (1), 27–44.
Moon Youngme (2000), “Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 323–339.
Morgan Robert, Hunt Shelby (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38.
Norberg Patricia A., Horne Daniel R, Horne David A (2007), “The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41 (1), 100–126.
Nowak Glen J., Phelps Joseph (1995), “Direct Marketing and the Use of Individual-Level Consumer Information: Determining How and When “Privacy” Matters,” Journal of Direct Marketing, 9 (3), 46–60.
Olivero Nadia, Lunt Peter (2004), “Privacy versus Willingness to Disclose in E-commerce Exchanges: The Effect of Risk Awareness on the Relative Role of Trust and Control,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 25 (2), 243–263.
Parasuraman A., Zeithmal Valarie A., Malhotra Arvind (2005), “E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality,” Journal of Service Research, 7 (3), 213–233.
Internet Pew & American Life Project (2008), Online Shopping. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Internet Pew & American Life Project (2009), Generations Online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Pham Michel Tuan, Avnet Tamar (2004), “Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance on Affect versus Substance in Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (March), 503–518.
Phelps Joseph, Nowak Glen, Ferrell Elizabeth (2000), “Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19 (1), 27–41.
Rifon Nora J., LaRose Robert, Choi Sejung M. (2005), “Your Privacy Is Sealed: Effects of Web Privacy Seals on Trust and Personal Disclosures,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39 (2), 339–362.
Saqib Najam U., Frohlich Norman, Bruning Edward (2010), “The Influence of Involvement on the Endowment Effect: The Moveable Value Function,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (July), 355–368.
Seiders Kathleen, Voss Glenn B., Grewal Dhruv, Godfrey Andrea L. (2005), “Do Satisfied Customers Buy More? Examining Moderating Influences in a Retailing Context,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (October), 26–43.
Sheehan Kim B. (1999), “An Investigation of Gender Differences in On-line Privacy Concerns and Resultant Behaviors,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13 (4), 24–38.
Sheehan Kim B., Hoy Mariea G. (1999), “Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concerns,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (3), 37–51.
Shimp Terence A., Hyatt Eva M., Snyder David J. (1991), “A Critical Appraisal of Demand Artifacts in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (December), 273–283.
Simonson Itamar (2005), “Determinants of Customers’ Responses to Customized Offers: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (January), 32–45.
Smith Alan D. (2006), “Exploring Service Marketing Aspects of E-Personalization and Its Impact on Online Consumer Behavior,” Services Marketing Quarterly, 27 (2), 89–102.
Smith H. Jeff, Milberg Sandra J., Burke Sandra J. (1996), “Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices,” MIS Quarterly, 20 (2), 167–196.
Son Jai-Yeol, Kim Sung S. (2008), “Internet Users’ Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model,” MIS Quarterly, 32 (3), 503–529.
Tversky Amos, Kahneman Daniel (1992), “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297–323.
U.S. Census Bureau (2003), Computer Use and Ownership, Current Population Survey Reports. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer.html (accessed January 10, 2010).
Ward Steven, Bridges Kate, Chitty Bill (2005), “Do Incentives Matter? An Examination of On-line Privacy Concerns and Willingness to Provide Personal and Financial Information,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (1), 21–40.
Wirtz Jochen, Lwin May O. (2009), “Regulatory Focus Theory, Trust, and Privacy Concern,” Journal of Service Research, 12 (2), 190–207.
Wirtz Jochen, Lwin May O., Williams Jerome D. (2007), “Causes and Consequences of Consumer Online Privacy Concern,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18 (4), 326–348.
Xie En, Teo Hock-Hai, Wan Wen (2006), “Volunteering Personal Information on the Internet: Effects of Reputation, Privacy Notices, and Rewards on Online Consumer Behavior,” Marketing Letters, 17 (1), 61–74.
Youn Seounmi (2005), “Teenagers’ Perceptions of Online Privacy and Coping Behaviors: A Risk-Benefit Appraisal Approach,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49 (1), 86–110.
Zauberman Gal (2003), “The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-in,” The Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 405–419.
Zhang Yue, Wang Charlie C. L., Chen Jim Q. (2001), “Chinese Online Consumers’ Responses to Web-Based Data Collection Efforts: A Comparison with American Online Consumers,” Journal of Database Marketing, 8 (4), 360–369.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 20, 2011
Issue published: February 2012

Keywords

  1. online disclosure
  2. privacy concern
  3. sensitivity of information
  4. prospect theory
  5. website customization
  6. information control

Rights and permissions

© SAGE Publications 2012.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David L. Mothersbaugh
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
William K. Foxx, II
Troy University Montgomery Campus, Montgomery, AL, USA
Sharon E. Beatty
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Sijun Wang
Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Notes

Sharon E. Beatty, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Service Research.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 4970

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 157 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 185

  1. An investigation into personal data sensitivity in the Internet of Everything—insights from China
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Consumer data collection strategies in two-sided platforms: The role of data ownership assignment and privacy concerns
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Information Disclosure of Electronic Commerce in Vietnam: Expectancy and Social Contract Theory Perspectives
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Social media disclosure: maximizing versus satisficing effects on default preferences
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. How does original equipment manufacturing brand disclosure affect purchase intention? The mediating role of brand competence and brand warmth
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Served or Exploited: The Impact of Data Capture Strategy on Users' Intention to Use Selected AI Systems
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Attitudes on Data Use for Public Benefit: Investigating Context-Specific Differences Across Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom With a Longitudinal Survey Experiment
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Consumer privacy decision-making in digital era: an integrative review and taxonomy
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fostering Information Sharing Willingness: An Organizational Privacy Calculus for Industry 4.0 Supply Chains
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Co-owned information disclosure and collective privacy calculus on social network platforms: the moderating role of information ownership
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text