Abstract
We advocate for the relevance of taking Brazilian past experience and theorization of populism into account to understand present-day challenges. We depart from Weffort’s conceptualization of populism to discuss the role of businesspeople movements in supporting and taking control of the political agenda through think tanks. According to Weffort, populism is built over precarious alliances that tend to favor policy or politics in different moments. During times of divergence among political elites, a populist leader emerges as a mediator in orchestrating an unstable hegemony among asymmetric classes. At the same time, the classes included in the populist alliance give legitimacy to the populist leader; they hinder his capacity of imposing decisions. However, treason of the weakest within the alliance is certain. We suggest that the political role played by the think tank IPES, in 1960s Brazil, in reframing middle-class demands is akin to contemporary populist events in Brazil—represented by the election of Jair Bolsonaro—and in the Anglo-Saxon world. Trumpism and Brexit are examples of a still-powerful free-market ideology project wrapped up under a populist discourse (re)framed with the support of businessmen and think tanks. A corporate takeover of government and the imposition of a free-market agenda are certain, as it is the treason of the weakest in the populist coalition. CMS academics should engage with the demands that give birth to populist movements as a way to dispute the neoliberal hegemony and anti-democratic populist solutions.
References
|
Assis, D. (2001) Propaganda e cinema: a serviço do golpe, 1962–1964. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Mauad Editora. Google Scholar | |
|
Barley, S. R. (2010) ‘Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies’, Organization Studies 31(6): 777–805. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Barros, A., Taylor, S. (2018) ‘Think Tanks, Business and Civil Society: The Ethics of Promoting Pro-Corporate Ideologies’, Journal of Business Ethics. Published online before print August 25, doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4007-y. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
BBC (2018) ‘Jair Bolsonaro: Brazil’s Firebrand Leader Dubbed the Trump of the Tropics’, Retrieved May 24, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-45746013 Google Scholar | |
|
Bickerton, C., Accetti, C. I. (2017) ‘Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20(2): 186–206. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1978) O Colapso de Uma Aliança de Classes. São Paulo, Brazil: Brasiliense. Google Scholar | |
|
Bristow, A., Robinson, S. (2018) ‘Brexiting CMS’, Organization 25(5): 636–648. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Centeno, M., Cohen, J. N. (2012) ‘The Arc of Neoliberalism’, Annual Review of Sociology 38: 317–40. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cooke, B. (2004) ‘The Managing of the (Third) World’, Organization 11(5): 603–29. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
de Carvalho, J. M . (2014) ‘Fortuna e virtú no golpe de 1964’, Estudos Avançados 28(80): 7–17. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dreifuss, R. A. (1980) State, Class and the Organic Elite: The Formation of an Entrepreneurial Order in Brazil 1961–1965. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Google Scholar | |
|
Dulci, O. (1986) A UDN e o Anti-populismo no Brasil, 1st ed. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar | |
|
Field, T. C. J. (2014) From Development to Dictatorship: Bolivia and The Alliance for Progress in the Kennedy Era, 1st ed. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Foroughi, H., Gabriel, Y., Fotaki, M. (2019) ‘Leadership in a Post-Truth Era: A New Narrative Disorder?’ Leadership 15: 135–51. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Germani, G., di Tella, T., Ianni, O. (1973) Populismo y contradicciones de clase en Latinoamérica (ed. Ianni, O. ), 1st ed. Mexico City, Mexico: Serie popular Era/21. Google Scholar | |
|
Gidron, N., Hall, P. A. (2017) ‘The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right’, British Journal of Sociology 68: S57–84. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Gilman, N. (2003) Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America, 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Gomes, A. D. C. (1996) ‘O populismo e as ciências sociais no Brasil: notas sobre a trajetória de um conceito’, Tempo, Rio de Janeiro 1(2): 31–58. Google Scholar | |
|
Gramsci, A. (1971), in Hoare, Q., Nowell-Smith, G. (eds) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart. Google Scholar | |
|
Guldi, J. (2016) ‘The Case for Utopia: History and the Possible Meanings of Brexit a Hundred Years On’, Globalizations 14: 150–56. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hanlon, G. (2018) ‘The First Neo-Liberal Science: Management and Neo-Liberalism’, Sociology 52(2): 298–315. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ianni, O. A. (1991) Formação do Estado Populista na América Latina, 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. Google Scholar | |
|
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2008) ‘Is There Any Future for Critical Management Studies in Latin America? Moving From Epistemic Coloniality to “Trans-Discipline”’, Organization 15(6): 932–5. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Inglehart, R. F., Norris, P. (2016) ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’, HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Retrieved from https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/Index.aspx Google Scholar | |
|
Jessop, B. (2010) ‘Cultural Political Economy and Critical Policy Studies’, Critical Policy Studies 3(3–4): 336–56. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaltwasser, C. R. (2014a) ‘Latin American Populism: Some Conceptual and Normative Lessons’, Constellations 21(4): 494–504. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaltwasser, C. R. (2014b) ‘The Responses of Populism to Dahl’s Democratic Dilemmas’, Political Studies 62(3): 470–87. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Klein, N. (2017) No Is Not Enough: Defeating the New Shock Politics. London: Allen Lane. Google Scholar | |
|
Leacock, R. (1990) Requiem for Revolution: The United States and Brazil, 1961–1969, 1st ed. Kent: The Kent State University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lusher, A. (2016) ‘Donald Trump Supporters Tell Immigrants ‘The Wolves Are Coming, You Are the Hunted’ as Race Hate Fears Rise’, Independent, 9 November. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-wins-racist-racism-race-hate-immigrants-nigel-farage-ukip-brexit-post-referendum-a7407951.html Google Scholar | |
|
McCann, B. (2003) ‘Carlos Lacerda: The Rise and Fall of a Middle-Class Populist in 1950s Brazil’, Hispanic American Historical Review 83(4): 661–96. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Maclean, N. (2017) Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America, 1st ed. New York: Viking Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Masood, A., Nisar, M. A. (2020) ‘Speaking Out: A Postcolonial Critique of the Academic Discourse on Far-Right Populism’, Organization 27(1): 162–173. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., et al. (2016) ‘A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature: Toward a Multi-Theoretical’, Integration. Journal of Management 42(1): 143–73. Google Scholar | Abstract | |
|
Morgan, G., Hirsch, P., Quack, S. (2015) ‘Elites on Trial: Introduction’, in Morgan, G., Hirsch, P., Quack, S. (eds) Elites on Trial (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), vol. 43, pp. 1–21. Bingley: Emerald Group. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mouffe, C. (2005) ‘The “End of Politics” and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism’. In Panizza, F. (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, pp. 72–98. London: Verso. Google Scholar | |
|
Mouffe, C. (2017) ‘Chantal Mouffe : “We Urgently Need to Promote a Populism” in an Interview, Chantal Mouffe Explains Her Conception of Left-Populism’, Retrieved November 19, 2018, from https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3341-chantal-mouffe-we-urgently-need-to-promote-a-left-populism Google Scholar | |
|
Mudde, C., Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013) ‘Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America’, Government and Opposition 48(2): 147–74. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mudde, C., Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ortellado, P., Ribeiro, M. M. (2018) ‘A campanha de Bolsonaro no Facebook: Antissistêmica e Conservadora, pouco liberal e nada nacionalista’, Retrieved from http://www.monitordigital.org/wp-content/uploads/bolsonaro40dias.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Parker, M. (2003) ‘Introduction : Ethics, Politics and Organizing’, Organization 10(2): 187–203. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Pastore, B. (2012) ‘Complexo IPES/IBAD, 44 anos depois: Instituto Millenium?’, Revista Aurora 5(2): 57–80. Google Scholar | |
|
Prasad, A., Mills, A. J. (2010) ‘Critical Management Studies and Business Ethics: A Synthesis and Three Research Trajectories for the Coming Decade’, Journal of Business Ethics 94(Suppl. 2): 227–37. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Roberts, M. (2016) The Long Depression: How It Happened, Why It Happened, and What Happens Next. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Robinson, S., Bristow, A. (2016) ‘Populist Responses to Austerity and Cultural Change: Brexit, Trumpism and Beyond. Call for Papers Special Paper Series of Organization’, Organization 24(3): 433–438. Google Scholar | |
|
Sader, E. (2005) Politics and Social Movements in an Hegemonic World: Lessons from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO). Retrieved November 12, 2016, from http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/sur-sur/20100711015041/3_Sader.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Salles-Djelic, M. -L. (2017) ‘Building an Architecture for Political Influence : Atlas and the Transnational Institutionalization of the Neoliberal Think Tank’, in Garsten, C., Sörbom, A. (eds) Power, Policy and Profit Corporate Engagement in Politics and Governance, 1st ed., pp. 25–44. Cheltenhan; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., Matten, D. (2014) ‘The Business Firm as a Political Actor: A New Theory of the Firm for a Globalized World’, Business & Society 53(2): 143–56. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Schmidt, V. A. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. European Business Review, vol. 13. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Schneider, B. R. (2004) Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Siekman, P. (1964) ‘When Executives Turned Revolutionaires, A History Hitherto Untold: How Sao Paulo Businessmen Conspired to Overthrow Brazil’s Communist-Infested Government’, Fortune 70 September: 147–149, 210–221. Google Scholar | |
|
Skidmore, T. E. (1967) Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An Experiment in Democracy, 1st ed. London; New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Spohr, M. (2016) American way of business: empresariado brasileiro e norte-americano no caminho do golpe empresarial-militar de 1964. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. Google Scholar | |
|
Starling, H. M. M. (1986) Os senhores das gerais: os novos inconfidentes e o Golpe de 1964. Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes. Google Scholar | |
|
Stookey, S. (2008) ‘The Future of Critical Management Studies: Populism and Elitism’, Organization 15(6): 922–4. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Taffet, J. F. (2007) Foreign Aid as Foreign Policy: The Alliance for Progress in Latin America. New York and Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
The Guardian (2018) ‘Rightwing UK Thinktank ‘Offered Ministerial Access’ to Potential US Donors’, Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/29/rightwing-thinktank-ministerial-access-potential-us-donors-insitute-of-economic-affairs-brexit Google Scholar | |
|
Vasconcelos, J., Hoeveler, R. (2018) ‘Chile-Brazil: A New Laboratory For The Far-Right’, Retrieved May 27, 2019, from http://www.brasilwire.com/chile-brazil-a-new-lab-for-the-far-right/ Google Scholar | |
|
Weffort, F. (1966) ‘State and Mass in Brazil’, Studies in Comparative International Development 2(12): 187–96. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Weffort, F. (1968) ‘Le Populisme’, Les Temps Modernes 23(4): 624–49. Google Scholar | |
|
Weffort, F. (1978) O populismo na política brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra. Google Scholar | |
|
Weffort, F. (2003) O Populismo na Politica Brasileira, 5th ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra. Google Scholar |


