Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online June 2, 2020

Diagnostic uncertainty during the transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Multicenter study in Argentina

Abstract

Background:

A period of diagnostic uncertainty often characterizes the clinical transition from relapsing to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).

Objective:

The aim of this study was to describe the length of time required to reclassify relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients who have clinically transitioned to SPMS (diagnosis uncertainty).

Methods:

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted in Argentina, identifying in every center all patients with diagnosis of MS who transitioned from RRMS to SPMS during the follow-up. We identified the dates of the last definitive RRMS and first definitive SPMS diagnoses for diagnostic uncertainty. The time required to reclassify RRMS who transitioned to SPMS and the time from disease onset to reclassify SPMS were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results:

A total of 170 patients were included, where the mean age at disease onset (first symptom) was 36 ± 6 years; the length of time required to reclassify RRMS patients who transitioned to SPMS was 3.3 ± 1.1 years (range = 1–7 years); and the time from disease onset to classify SPMS was 19.4 ± 8.5 years (range = 16–35 years).

Conclusion:

A period of diagnostic uncertainty regarding the transition from RRMS to SPMS was present in many of our patients, with a mean time of 3.3 years.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mahad DH, Trapp BD, Lassmann H. Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14(2): 183–193.
2. Faissner S, Plemel JR, Gold R, et al. Progressive multiple sclerosis: From pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019; 18(12): 905–922.
3. Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X, et al. Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: Natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4(5): 281–288.
4. Comi G, Radaelli M, Soelberg Sorensen P. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2017; 389(10076): 1347–1356.
5. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey. Neurology 1996; 46(4): 907–911.
6. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions. Neurology 2014; 83: 278–286.
7. Katz Sand I, Krieger S, Farrell C, et al. Diagnostic uncertainty during the transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014; 20(12): 1654–1657.
8. Soelberg Sorensen P, Giovannoni G, Montalban X, et al. The multiple sclerosis care unit. Mult Scler 2019; 25: 627–636.
9. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162–173.
10. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011; 69(2): 292–302.
11. Carnero Contentti E, Pettinicchi JP, Lopez PA, et al. Access and unmet needs to multiple sclerosis care in a cohort of Argentinean patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 33: 88–93.
12. Rivera VM, Macias MA. Access and barriers to MS care in Latin America. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2017; 3(1): 2055217317700668.
13. Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgun K, et al. A focus on secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS): Challenges in diagnosis and definition. J Neurol 2019.
14. Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, et al. Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2016; 139: 2395–2405.
15. Trojano M, Tintore M, Montalban X, et al. Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis—Insights from real-world observational studies. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13(2): 105–118.
16. Kalincik T. Effectiveness of oral multiple sclerosis therapies in clinical context. Neurology 2019; 92(16): 737–738.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: June 2, 2020
Issue published: April 2021

Keywords

  1. Multiple sclerosis
  2. secondary progressive
  3. delay
  4. transition
  5. Argentina

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s), 2020.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 32484381

Authors

Affiliations

Juan Ignacio Rojas
Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Liliana Patrucco
Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ricardo Alonso
Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Sanatorio Guemes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orlando Garcea
Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Norma Deri
Centro de Investigaciones Diabaid, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Edgar Carnero Contentti
Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Pablo A Lopez
Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Juan Pablo Pettinicchi
Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Alejandro Caride
Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Edgardo Cristiano
Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Notes

JI Rojas Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires (CEMBA), Billinghurst 1611, CP 1181 Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 365

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 10 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 11

  1. Accuracy of MSBase criteria to diagnose secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in large German real-world patient cohort
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Multiple sclerosis: emerging epidemiological trends and redefining the clinical course
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Practical clinical predictions: development and validation of the DAAE Score, a tool for estimating patient risk of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clinical characterization of long-term multiple sclerosis (COLuMbus) patients in Argentina: A cross-sectional non-interventional study
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diagnostic Potential of Two Novel Biomarkers for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Multiple Sclerosis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Treatment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Transitioning Between Relapsing and Progressive Disease
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A national consensus paper on diagnostic criteria
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Machine learning techniques for prediction of multiple sclerosis progression
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Central nervous system macrophages in progressive multiple sclerosis: relationship to neurodegeneration and therapeutics
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clinical and Paraclinical Biomarkers and the Hitches to Assess Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text