Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 7, 2020

Structural constraints of functional connectivity drive cognitive impairment in the early stages of multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background:

The relationship between structural and functional deficits in multiple sclerosis (MS) is unclear.

Objective:

This study explored structure-function relationships during the 5 years following a clinically isolated syndrome and their role in cognitive performance.

Methods:

Thirty-two patients were enrolled after their first neurological episode suggestive of MS and followed for 5 years, along with 10 matched healthy controls. We assessed structural (using diffusion tensor imaging) and functional (using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)) brain network metrics, clinical and cognitive scores at each follow-up visit. Structural–functional coupling, calculated as the correlation coefficient between strengths of structural and functional networks, was used to assess structure–function relationships.

Results:

Structural clustering coefficient was significantly increased after 5 years, whereas characteristic path length decreased. Structural connections decreased after 1 year and increased after 5 years. Functional connections and related path lengths were decreased after 5 years. Structural–functional coupling had increased significantly after 5 years. This structural–functional coupling was associated with cognitive and clinical evolution, with stronger coupling associated with a decline in both domains.

Conclusion:

Our findings provide novel biological evidence that MS leads to a more constrained anatomical-dependant functional connectivity. The collapse of this network seems to lead to both cognitive worsening and clinical disability.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chiaravalloti ND, Deluca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 1139–1151.
2. Reuter F, Zaaraoui W, Crespy L, et al. Frequency of cognitive impairment dramatically increases during the first 5 years of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 1157–1159.
3. Miller DH, Chard DT, Ciccarelli O. Clinically isolated syndromes. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 157–169.
4. Fleischer V, Radetz A, Ciolac D, et al. Graph theoretical framework of brain networks in multiple sclerosis: A review of concepts. Neuroscience 2019; 403: 35–53, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306452217307613 (accessed 7 November 2017).
5. Honey CJ, Sporns O, Cammoun L, et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106: 2035–2040, http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.0811168106 (accessed 3 November 2017).
6. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O, Collin G, et al. Abnormal rich club organization and functional brain dynamics in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70(8): 783–792.
7. Koubiyr I, Besson P, Deloire M, et al. Dynamic modular-level alterations of structural-functional coupling in clinically isolated syndrome. Brain 2019; 142: 3428–3439, https://academic.oup.com/brain/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/brain/awz270/5560327 (accessed 6 September 2019).
8. Lassmann H. Pathology and disease mechanisms in different stages of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2013; 333: 1–4.
9. Dineen RA, Vilisaar J, Hlinka J, et al. Disconnection as a mechanism for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2009; 132: 239–249, https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-abstract/132/1/239/287443 (accessed 26 February 2019).
10. Bullmore E, Sporns O. The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012; 13: 336–349, http://www.nature.com/articles/nrn3214 (accessed 7 February 2019).
11. Park HJ, Friston K. Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science 2013; 342: 1238411.
12. Schoonheim MM. Functional reorganization is a maladaptive response to injury – Commentary. Mult Scler J 2017; 23: 194–196, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1352458516677593
13. Schoonheim MM, Meijer KA, Geurts JJG. Network collapse and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol 2015; 6: 194–196.
14. Bech A, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition. San Antonio Psychol Corp 1996; 4: 561–571.
15. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–1452, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6685237 (accessed 31 January 2019).
16. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162–173.
17. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2012; 22: 53–66, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ima.22005 (accessed 18 January 2019).
18. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. Determination of the appropriate b value and number of gradient directions for high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed 2013; 26: 1775–1786, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/nbm.3017 (accessed 18 January 2019).
19. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 1459–1472, www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg (accessed 18 January 2019).
20. Smith RE, Tournier JD, Calamante F, et al. SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. Neuroimage 2013; 67: 298–312.
21. Chang C, Glover GH. Effects of model-based physiological noise correction on default mode network anti-correlations and correlations. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1448–1459.
22. Anderson JS, Druzgal TJ, Lopez-Larson M, et al. Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase-shifted soft tissue correction. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 919–934.
23. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1059–1069.
24. Collin G, Scholtens LH, Kahn RS, et al. Affected anatomical rich club and structural–functional coupling in young offspring of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients. Biol Psychiat 2017; 82: 746–755.
25. Sun Y, Dai Z, Li J, et al. Modular-level alterations of structure–function coupling in schizophrenia connectome. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38: 2008–2025, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hbm.23501 (accessed 3 January 2019).
26. Dai Z, Lin Q, Li T, et al. Disrupted structural and functional brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2019; 75: 71–82, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0197458018304068 (accessed 3 January 2019).
27. Audoin B, Guye M, Reuter F, et al. Structure of WM bundles constituting the working memory system in early multiple sclerosis: A quantitative DTI tractography study. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 1324–1330.
28. Prosperini L, Di Filippo M. Beyond clinical changes: Rehabilitation-induced neuroplasticity in MS. Mult Scler J 2019; 25: 1348–1362, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1352458519846096 (accessed 6 April 2020).
29. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 312–312, http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nrn2618 (accessed 3 November 2017).
30. Koubiyr I, Deloire M, Besson P, et al. Longitudinal study of functional brain network reorganization in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler J 2020: 26: 188–200.
31. An HS, Moon WJ, Ryu JK, et al. Inter-vender and test-retest reliabilities of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging: Implications for multi-center imaging studies. Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 44: 125–130, www.elsevier.com/locate/mri (accessed 6 November 2017).
32. Shen K, Mišić B, Cipollini BN, et al. Stable long-range interhemispheric coordination is supported by direct anatomical projections. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015; 112: 6473–6478, http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1503436112 (accessed 7 February 2019).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 7, 2020
Issue published: April 2021

Keywords

  1. Multiple sclerosis
  2. clinically isolated syndrome
  3. functional MRI
  4. diffusion tensor imaging
  5. graph theory
  6. cognition

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s), 2020.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 33283582

Authors

Affiliations

Ismail Koubiyr
University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Inserm U1215 – Neurocentre Magendie, Bordeaux, France
Mathilde Deloire
CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Bruno Brochet
University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Inserm U1215 – Neurocentre Magendie, Bordeaux, France; CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Pierre Besson
Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
Julie Charré-Morin
CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Aurore Saubusse
CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Thomas Tourdias
University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Inserm U1215 – Neurocentre Magendie, Bordeaux, France; CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Aurélie Ruet
University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Inserm U1215 – Neurocentre Magendie, Bordeaux, France; CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Notes

B Brochet CHU Pellegrin Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France. [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 755

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 21 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 23

  1. Amyloid pathology related to aberrant structure-function coupling of brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from [18F]-florbetapir PET imaging
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. White Matter Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Measures in Multiple Sclerosis with Overactive Bladder
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Structure–function coupling in macroscale human brain networks
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Network Analysis in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alterations of brain structural and functional connectivity networks topology and decoupling in pediatric myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Correlation between cognitive changes and neuroradiological changes over time in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. 2.5-Year changes of connectivity dynamism are relevant for physical and cognitive deterioration in multiple sclerosis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle ScholarPub Med
  8. Functional-structural decoupling in visual network is associated with cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence from a multimodal MRI analysis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graph-Based Analysis of Brain Connectivity in Multiple Sclerosis Using Functional MRI: A Systematic Review
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text