Review article: World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges
Abstract
World government has, very recently, resumed its place as the subject of serious investigation by leading scholars in International Relations, economics and political theory. Prompted variously by global economic integration, the persistence of the nuclear weapons threat and a US hegemony that ostensibly functions as a form of world state, some empirically oriented scholars have found themselves pursuing discrete lines of inquiry to the common possibility of global political integration. The main empirical currents, especially those focused on security, have important precedents in the world state ‘heyday’ of 1944—50, and some are open to the kinds of critiques previously levied at such arguments. Normative arguments advocating gradual expansions of core rights through political integration may offer the most plausible and defensible route to deep global integration, but not necessarily one that will end at some comprehensive world state modelled on the nation-state.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
1.
1 Craig suggests that the plan may not have been intended to succeed, being aimed rather at enabling ‘the United States and the Soviet Union to continue apace with their respective atomic projects’ (2008, 134; see also Craig and Radchenko, 2008).
References
Adler MJ, Barr S., Borgese GA, et al. (1948) Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Archibugi D. ( 2002) Demos and cosmopolis. New Left Review 13 (January/February): 24-38.
Archibugi D. ( 2004) Cosmopolitan democracy and its critics: A review. European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 437-473.
Archibugi D. ( 2008) The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baratta JP ( 2004) The Politics of World Federation. Vol. 1: The United Nations, UN Reform, Atomic Control. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Barry B. ( 1991) Liberty and Justice: Essays in Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Beitz C. ( 1989) Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bergsten CF ( 1993) The rationale for a rosy view. Economist 11 September: 57-61.
Boxill B. ( 1987) Global equality of opportunity and national integrity . Social Philosophy and Policy 5(1): 143-168.
Brinton C. ( 1948) From Many One: The Process of Political Integration, the Problem of World Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown GW ( 2005) State sovereignty, federation and Kantian cosmopolitanism . European Journal of International Relations 11(4): 495-522.
Buchanan A. ( 2004) The internal legitimacy of humanitarian intervention. Journal of Political Philosophy 7(1): 71-87
Buchanan A., Keohane R. ( 2004) The preventive use of force: A cosmopolitan institutional proposal. Ethics and International Affairs 18(1): 1-22.
Cabrera L. ( 2004) Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. London: Routledge .
Cabrera L. ( 2007) The inconveniences of transnational democracy. Ethics and International Affairs 21(2): 219-238.
Caney S. ( 2005) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carneiro RL ( 2004) The political unification of the world: Whether, when, and how - some speculations. Cross-Cultural Research 38(2): 162-177.
Caudill S. ( 1991) Trying to harness atomic energy, 1946-51: Albert Einstein’s publicity campaign for world government. Journalism Quarterly 68(1-2): 235-262.
Cerutti F. ( 2007) Global Challenges for Leviathan: A Political Philosophy of Nuclear Weapons and Global Warming. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Clark G., Sohn L. ( 1966) World Peace through World Law, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen M. ( 1984) Moral skepticism and international relations. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13(4): 299-346.
Copp D. ( 2005) International justice and the basic needs principle. In: Brock G, Brighouse H (eds) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39-54.
Corbett P. ( 1950) Congress and proposals for international government. International Organization 4(3): 383-399.
Cousins N. ( 1945) Modern Man is Obsolete. New York: Viking.
Craig C. ( 2003) Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press.
Craig C. ( 2008) The resurgent idea of world government. Ethics & International Affairs 22(2): 133-142.
Craig C., Radchenko S. ( 2008) The Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deudney DH ( 2001) Greater Britain or greater synthesis? Seeley, Mackinder, and Wells on Britain in the global industrial era. Review of International Studies 27(2): 187-208.
Deudney DH ( 2007) Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ehrlinger J., Gilovich T., and Ross L. ( 2005) Peering into the bias blind spot: People’s assessments of bias in themselves and others. Personality and Psychology Bulletin 31: 680-692.
Einstein A. ( 2007 [1946]) The way out. In: Masters D, Way K (eds) One World Or None: A Report to the Public on the Full Meaning of the Atomic Bomb. New York: The New Press, 209-214.
Esty D. ( 2002) The World Trade Organization’s legitimacy crisis . World Trade Review 1(1): 7-22.
Etzioni A. ( 2001a) Beyond transnational governance. International Journal 56(4): 595-610.
Etzioni A. ( 2001b) Introduction to political unification revisited. In: Etzioni A, Political Unification Revisited. Lanham, MD: Lexington, vii-lii.
Etzioni A. ( 2004) From Empire to Community: A New Approach to International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan .
Falk R. ( 1975) A new paradigm for international legal studies: Prospects and proposals. Yale Law Journal 84(5): 969-1021.
Falk R, Mendlovitz S (eds) (1966) The Strategy of World Order, Volumes I-IV. New York: World Law Fund.
Falk R., Strauss A. ( 2001) Toward global parliament (citizen input on globalization) . Foreign Affairs 80(January/February): 212-218.
Ferguson N. ( 2004) Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire. New York: Penguin.
Frankman MJ ( 2004) World Democratic Federalism: Peace and Justice Indivisible . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
Habermas J. ( 2006) The Divided West. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harris EE ( 1966) Annihilation and Utopia: The Principles of International Politics. London: Allen and Unwin .
Heater D. ( 1996) World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political Thought. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Held D. ( 2004) Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity.
House Committee on Foreign Affairs (1949) To Seek the Development of the United Nations Into a World Federation, 81st Congress, 1st Session, 12-13 October 1949: 379-403.
Howse R., Nicolaidis K. ( 2003) Enhancing WTO legitimacy: Constitutionalization or global subsidiarity? Governance 16: 73-94.
Jackson PT ( 2004) Forum introduction: Is the state a person? Why should we care? Review of International Studies 30: 255-258.
Jones C. ( 1999) Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant I. ( 2003 [1795]) To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, trans. Humphrey T. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett .
Lu C. ( 2008) World government. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/world-government
Mandelbaum M. ( 2005) The Case for Goliath: How America Acts As the World’s Government in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Public Affairs.
Manley JP, Aspe P., Weld WF, et al. (2005) Building a North American Community. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Marchetti R. ( 2006) Global governance or world federalism? A cosmopolitan dispute on institutional models. Global Society 20(3): 287-305.
Marchetti R. ( 2008a) Global Democracy, For and Against: Ethical Theory, Institutional Design, and Social Struggles. London: Routledge.
Marchetti R. ( 2008b) A matter of drawing boundaries: Global democracy and international exclusion. Review of International Studies 34: 207-224.
Masters D, Way K (eds) (1946) One World Or None: A Report to the Public on the Full Meaning of the Atomic Bomb. New York: The New Press.
Nagel T. ( 2005) The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113-147.
Nielsen K. ( 1988) World government, security, and global justice. In: Luper-Foy S (ed.) Problems of International Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview, 263-282.
Nielsen K. ( 2002) Globalization and Justice. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
Nussbaum M. ( 2005) Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice . In: Brock G, Brighouse H (eds) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 196-218.
Nussbaum M. ( 2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA Belknap, Harvard.
Orwell G. ( 1946 [1941]) Wells, Hitler, and the world state . In: Critical Essays. London: Secker and Warburg, 83-88.
Peregrine PN, Ember M., and Ember C. ( 2004) Predicting the future state of the world using archaeological data: An exercise in archaeomancy. Cross-Cultural Research 38(2): 133-146.
Pianta M., Marchetti R. ( 2007) The global justice movements: The transnational dimension . In: della Porta D (ed.) The Global Justice Movement: A Cross-national and Transnational Perspective . Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 29-51.
Pogge T. ( 1998) A global resources dividend. In: Crocker DA, Linden T (eds) Ethics of Consumption: The Good Life, Justice and Global Stewardship. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 501-536.
Pogge T. ( 2002) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge : Polity Press.
Pojman L. ( 2006) Terrorism, Human Rights, and the Case for World Government . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
Pronin E., Gilovich T., and Ross L. ( 2004) Theoretical note: Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review 111: 781-799.
Rachman G. ( 2008) And now for a world government. Financial Times, 8 December.
Rawls J. ( 1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reves E. ( 1945) The Anatomy of Peace. New York: Harper.
Rodrik D. ( 2000) How far will economic integration go? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 177-186.
Rodrik D. ( 2007) The inescapable trilemma of the world economy. Dani Rodrik’s Weblog. Available at: http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/06/the-inescapable.html
Rogoff K. ( 2001) Why not a global currency? American Economic Review 91(2): 243-247.
Rorty R. ( 1998) Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Russell B. ( 1991 [1959]) Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare. London: Routledge.
Schell J. ( 1982) The Fate of the Earth. New York: Knopf.
Schuman F. ( 1954) The Commonwealth of Man: An Inquiry into Power Politics and World Government. London: Hale .
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (1950 ) Revision of the United Nations Charter, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, 2-20 February: 379-403; 414-434.
Shaffer G. ( 2004) Parliamentary oversight of WTO rule-making: The political, normative, and practical consequences. Journal of International Economic Law 7: 629-654.
Shannon VP ( 2005) Wendt’s violation of the constructivist project: Agency and why a world state is not inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 11(4): 581-587.
Shaw M. ( 2000) Theory of the Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singer P. ( 2002) One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Talbott S. ( 1992) The birth of a global nation. Time, 20 July.
Talbott S. ( 2008) The Great Experiment: The Story of Ancient Empires, Modern States, and the Quest for a Global Nation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Tamir Y. ( 2000) Who’s afraid of a global state? In: Goldmann K, Hannerz U, and Westin C (eds) Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Routledge, 244-267.
Tan K.-C (2004) Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tännsjö T. ( 2008) Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Thompson J. ( 1992) Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
Tinnevelt R., Verschraegen G. ( 2006) Protecting human rights: Transnational governance or world state? In: Tinnevelt R, Verschraegen G (eds) Between Cosmopolitan Ideals and State Sovereignty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 170-181.
Usborne HC ( 1946) Towards world government: The role of Britain. Peace Aims Pamphlet 39. London: National Peace Council.
Van Den Anker C. ( 2006) Cosmopolitan institutions: Justice, governance, and political economy. Global Society 20(3): 233-238.
Wagar WW ( 1996) Toward a praxis of world integration. Journal of World Systems Research 2(2): 1-18.
Walzer M. ( 1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality . New York: Basic Books.
Walzer M. ( 1986) The reform of the international system. In: Osterud O (ed.) Studies of War and Peace. Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 227-244.
Waltz KN ( 1986) Anarchic orders and balances of power. In: Keohane RO (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics . New York: Columbia University Press, 98-130.
Weiss TG (2009) What happened to the idea of world government? International Studies Quarterly 53(2): 253-271.
Wendt A. ( 1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt A. ( 2003) Why a world state is inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491-542.
Wendt A. ( 2005) Agency, teleology, and the world state: A reply to Shannon . European Journal of International Relations 11(4): 589-598.
Went R. ( 2002) Economic globalization plus cosmopolitanism? Review of International Political Economy 11(2): 337-355.
Wolf M. ( 2004) A global market economy needs a global currency. Financial Times, 4 August: 11.
Wooley WT ( 1988) Alternatives to Anarchy: American Supranationalism Since World War II. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Wright R. ( 2000) World government is coming. Deal with it. Continental drift (concern about the increasing power of international organizations such as the World Trade Organization). New Republic, 17 January: 18-23.
Young IM ( 2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zolo D. ( 1997) Cosmopolis: Prospects for World Government. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 19, 2010
Issue published: September 2010
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in European Journal of International Relations.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 1404
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 28 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 30
- Who on Earth Wants a World Government, What Kind, and Why? An International Survey Experiment
- The Universal Republic
- Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
- Nuclear weapons, existentialism, and International Relations: Anders, Ballard, and the human condition in the age of extinction
- Revisiting the World Order Models Project: A Case for Renewal?
- Financing the recovery from the havoc created by Covid: reinforcing the need for a world federal government
- The United Citizens Organization: Public-private partnerships in global governance
- ¿Primero los nuestros? Apertura controlada de fronteras y cosmopolitismo moderado
- Global informalism and the G20
- Towards a ‘pluralist’ world order: creative agency and legitimacy in global institutions
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
EISA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
EISA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
