![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The Code of Practice of the Department for Education (1994) establishes the role of special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) to help facilitate the inclusion of pupils with special educational needs (SEN) in mainstream schools. SENCOs, thus, should form an integral part of the culture of all departments, including physical education (PE). This paper draws on the concept of hegemony to examine the processes and practices that shape the experiences and views of SENCOs and ultimately, the extent to which they facilitate an inclusive culture in PE. Our findings, generated via an online survey, suggested that most SENCOs are not a part of the senior management team (SMT) and do not have control of the SEN budget. The majority of SENCOs acknowledge, and often reinforce, the hegemonic status of English, mathematics and science vis-à-vis the prioritisation of SEN resources, which may constrain the ability of teachers to provide meaningful experiences for pupils with SEN in other subjects, such as PE. While 93% of SENCOs did not have PE-specific training for their role, 52% suggested that the learning support assistants (LSAs) in their school are not adequately trained to include pupils with SEN in PE. This is perhaps surprising, given that it is SENCOs themselves who are largely responsible for the training of LSAs. In conclusion, from the evidence provided by SENCOs, PE does not appear to constitute a significant dimension of their training programmes and SENCOs themselves may further subordinate PE, in the process of training LSAs. This may call into question the ability of both SENCOs and LSAs to contribute to the cultivation of an inclusive culture in PE.
References
Section:
|
Atkinson, H, Black, K (2006) The Experiences of Young Disabled People Participating in PE, School Sport and Extra-Curricular Activities in Leicestershire and Rutland. Loughborough: Institute of Youth Sport/Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, Loughborough University. Google Scholar | |
|
Audit Commission (2002) Special Educational Needs: A Mainstream Issue. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Barker, C (2008) Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Bryman, A (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cole, B (2005) Mission impossible? Special educational needs, inclusion and the reconceptualization of the role of the SENCO in England and Wales. European Journal of Special Needs Education 20 (3): 287–307. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cowne, E (2005) What do special educational needs coordinators think they do? British Journal of Learning Support 20 (2): 61–68. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) (2009) Consultation on Draft Regulations for the Training of Newly Appointed Special Educational Needs Co-ordinators (SENCOs) in England. London: DCSF. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (DfE) (1994) Code of Practice on Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: DfE. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (DfE) (2010) The Importance of Teaching: A Schools White Paper. London: DfE. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (DfE) (2011a) Review of Vocational Education: The Wolf Report. London: DfE. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (DfE) (2011b) Support and aspiration: a new approach to special educational needs and disability: A consultation. Available at: www.education.gov.uk/schools/pupilsupport/sen/a0075339/sengreenpaper (accessed 15 June 2012). Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (DfE) (2012) Press release: performance table reform and transparency will raise standards and end perverse incentives. Available at: www.education.gov.uk/a00192510/performance-table-reform-and-transparency-will-raise-standards-and-end-perverse-incentives (accessed 13 June 2012). Google Scholar | |
|
Department of Education and Science (DES) (1978) Special Educational Needs: A Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Department of Education and Science (DES) (1981) The 1981 Education Act. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2001) Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Pupils with Special Educational Needs. London: DfES. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education and Skills (DfES)/Cabinet Office Regulatory Impact Unit (2004) Special Educational Needs Consultancy Project: Cutting Red Tape and Bureaucracy. London: Cabinet Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Dillman, D (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Dillman, D, Christenson, J, Carpenter. (1974) Increasing mail questionnaire response: A four-state comparison. American Sociological Review 39: 744–756. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fitzgerald, H (2005) Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10(1): 41–59. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fitzgerald, H, Jobling, A, Kirk, D (2003a) Valuing the voices of young disabled people: Exploring experience of physical education and sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 8(2): 175–200. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fitzgerald, H, Jobling, A, Kirk, D (2003b) Listening to the ‘voices’ of students with severe learning difficulties through a task-based approach to research and learning in physical education. Support for Learning 18(3): 123–129. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fredrickson, N, Cline, T (2002) Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diversity: A Textbook. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hall, S (1981) Notes on deconstructing the popular. In: Samuel, R (ed) People’s History and Socialist Theory. London: Routledge, pp.227–239. Google Scholar | |
|
Halliday, P (1993) Physical education within special education provision: Equality and entitlement. In: Evans, J (ed) Equality, Education and Physical Education. London: The Falmer Press, pp.205–217. Google Scholar | |
|
Hoare, Q Smith, G (1971) Antonio Gramsci: Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Biddles Ltd. Google Scholar | |
|
Kerry, T (2005) Towards a typology for conceptualizing the roles of teaching assistants. Educational Review 57(3): 373–384. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Learning and Skills Council (LSC) (2004) LSC School Support Staff Sector Plan for 2004–5 and Beyond. London: LSC. Google Scholar | |
|
Maher, A (2010) The inclusion of pupils with special educational needs: The perspective of mainstream secondary school physical education teachers in North-West England. Sport Science Review XIX (5–6): 263–283. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morley, D, Bailey, R, Tan, J. (2005) Inclusive physical education: Teachers’ views of including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities in physical education. European Physical Education Review 11(1): 84–107. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
National Union of Teachers (NUT) (2004) Special Educational Needs Coordinators and the Revised Code of Practice: A NUT Survey. London: NUT. Google Scholar | |
|
Neuman, W (2011) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Saldana, J (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Schaefer, D, Dillman, D (1998) Development of standard email methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(3): 378–397. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Silverman, D (2011) Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Sissel, P, Sheard, V (2001) Opening the gates: Reflections on power, hegemony, language and the status quo. In: Sheard, V, Sissel, P (eds) Making Space: Merging Theory and Practice in Adult Education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, pp.3–15. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, A, Green, K (2004) Including pupils with special educational needs in secondary school physical education: A sociological analysis of teachers’ views. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25(5): 93–608. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stationary Office (2001) Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (SENDA). London: Stationary Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Szwed, C (2007) Remodelling policy and practice: The challenge for staff working with children with special educational needs. Educational Review 59(2): 147–160. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
The Education and Skills Committee (2006) Special Educational Needs – Third Report of Session 2005–2006. London: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Thomas, N, Smith, A (2009) Disability, Sport and Society: An Introduction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Vickerman, P (2007) Training physical education teachers to include children with special educational needs: Perspectives from physical education teacher training providers. European Physical Education Review 18(3): 285–402. Google Scholar | |
|
Vickerman, P, Blundell, M (2012) English learning support assistants’ experiences of including children with special educational needs in physical education. European Journal of Special Needs Education 27(2): 143–156. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Weddell, K (2004) Points from the SENCO-forum: life as a SENCO. British Journal of Special Education 31(3): 105. Google Scholar |
