![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Research shows that teachers’ grading is influenced by non-achievement factors in addition to official criteria, such as knowledge and skills. Some grading criteria are internalised by the teacher, who is sometimes unable to verbalise the criteria used and refers to what is called a ‘gut feeling’. Therefore, transparency, validity and reliability are problematic. The aim of this study was to explore which criteria physical education teachers consider important when grading. Such an exploration makes it possible to discuss how the verbalised criteria and the value they are given by the teachers can be understood. Four Year 9 teachers at different Swedish compulsory schools were interviewed using Kelly’s Repertory Grid technique. Among the verbalised criteria, four themes were identified: motivation, knowledge and skills, self-confidence and interaction with others. The teachers sometimes had difficulties predicting which criteria had relevance to the grades given, and the criteria considered important by the teachers were not always reflected in the grade. The verbalised criteria revealed teachers using grades to encourage such student behaviours that helped them to handle the classroom situation and to facilitate students learning. To become cognisant of and develop their grading, methods to verbalise their individual grading criteria were needed, and Kelly’s Repertory Grid technique is one possible option. The results provide discussion points about reasons for the way teachers are grading.
Keywords Assessment, grading practice, physical education, repertory grid
References
Section:
|
Annerstedt, C, Larsson, S (2010) ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are … ’: Grading in Swedish PEH – problems of validity, comparability and fairness. European Physical Education Review 16(2): 97–115. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bernstein, B (2003) Class, Codes and Control. Vol. 3, Towards a Theory of Educational Transmission. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Björklund, L-E (2008a) The repertory grid technique, Making tacit knowledge explicit: Assessing creative work and problem solving skills. In: Middleton, H (ed) Researching Technology Education: Methods and Techniques. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.46–69. Google Scholar | |
|
Björklund, L-E (2008b) Från novis till expert: Förtrogenhetskunskap i kognitiv och didaktisk belysning. [From novice to expert: Intuition in a cognitive and educational perspective.] PhD Thesis, University of Linköping, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Borell, K, Brenner, S-O (1997) Att spegla verkligheten. [To reflect reality.] Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar | |
|
Brookhart, SM (1991) Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 10(1): 35–36. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Brookhart, SM (1994) Teachers' grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement In Education 7(4): 279–302. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Chan, K, Hay, P, Tinning, R (2011) Understanding the pedagogic discourse of assessment in physical education. Asia-Pacific Journal Of Health, Sport & Physical Education 2(1): 3–18. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cizek, G, Fitzgerald, S, Rachor, R (1996) Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment 3(2): 159–179. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cliffordson, C (2008) Differential prediction of study success across academic programs in the Swedish context: The validity of grades and tests as selection instruments for higher education. Educational Assessment 13(1): 56–75. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cox, K (2011) Putting classroom grading on the table: A reform in progress. American Secondary Education 40(1): 67–87. Google Scholar | |
|
Cross, L, Frary, R (1999) Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement In Education 12(1): 53–73. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Evans, J (2004) Making a difference? Education and ability in physical education. European Physical Education Review 10(1): 95–108. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Fransella, F, Bell, R, Bannister, D (2004) A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Hay, P, MacDonald, D (2008) (Mis)appropriations of criteria and standards-referenced assessment in a performance-based subject. Assessment In Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 15(2): 153–168. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hay, P, Penney, D (2012) Assessment in Physical Education: A Sociocultural Perspective. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
James, A, Griffin, L, France, T (2005) Perceptions of assessment in elementary physical education: A case study. Physical Educator 62(2): 85–95. Google Scholar | |
|
Kelly, GA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vol. 1. A Theory of Personality. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc. Google Scholar | |
|
Klapp Lekholm, A, Cliffordson, C (2008) Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school level: Effects of gender and family background. Educational Research and Evaluation 14(2): 181–199. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Klapp Lekholm, A, Cliffordson, C (2009) Effects of student characteristics on grades in compulsory school. Educational Research and Evaluation 15(1): 1–23. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Korp, H (2006) Lika chanser i gymnasiet?: En studie om betyg, nationella prov och social reproduction. [Same chances in upper secondary school? A study of grades, national tests and social reproduction.] PhD Thesis. University of Lund, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Linde, G (1993) On curriculum transformation: explaining selection of content in teaching. PhD Thesis, University of Uppsala, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Linde, G (2012) Det ska ni veta!: En introduktion till läroplans teori. [This you should know! An introduction to the theory of curriculum.] 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar | |
|
McMillan, J, Nash, S (2000) Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making. In: Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA, 25–27 April 2000. Google Scholar | |
|
McMillan, JH (2003) Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision-making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues And Practice 22(4): 34–43. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mickwitz, L (2011) Rätt betyg för vem? Betygsättning som institutionaliserad praktik. [The right grade for who? Grading as an institutionalised practice.] Master Thesis, University of Stockholm, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Penney, D, Brooker, R, Hay, P, Gillespie, L (2009) Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: Three message systems of schooling and dimensions of quality physical education, Sport, Education and Society, 14(4): 421–442, Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Redelius, K, Hay, P (2009) Defining, acquiring and transacting cultural capital through assessment in physical education. European Physical Education Review 15 (3): 275–294. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Redelius, K, Fagrell, B, Larsson, H (2009) Symbolic capital in physical education and health: To be, to do or to know? That is the gendered question. Sport, Education & Society 14(2): 245–260. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rep5: RepGrid Manual for Version 1.0 (2009) Available at: http://repgrid.com/Rep5/Manuals/Rep5RepGridManual/ (accessed 7 January 2013). Google Scholar | |
|
Rossi, T, Hooper, T (2001) Using personal construct theory and narrative methods to facilitate reflexive constructions of teaching physical education. The Australian Educational Researcher 28(3): 87–116. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Selghed, B (2004) Ännu icke godkänt: Lärares sätt att erfara betygssystemet och dess tillämpning i yrkesutövningen. [Not yet passed: How teachers experience a criterion-referenced grading system and what they say about its use in Swedish secondary school. ] PhD Thesis, University of Lund, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Swedish National Agency for Education (2000) Grundskolan: Kursplaner och betygskriterier. [Compulsory school: Curriculum and grading criteria]. Stockholm: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Swedish National Agency for Education (2004) Nationella utvärderingen av grundskolan 2003: Huvudrapport- bild, hem- och konsumentkunskap,, idrott och hälsa, musik och slöjd. [National Evaluation of compulsory school 2003: Main report- art, domestic science, physical education and health, music and craft.] Stockholm: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Swedish National Agency for Education (2009) Statistics about schools in Sweden. Available at www.skolverket.se/statistik (accessed 3 January 2011). Google Scholar | |
|
Swedish National Agency for Education (2011) Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. [Curriculum for compulsory school, preschool and youth leisure centre 2011.] Stockholm: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Stiggins, R, Griswold, P, Frisbis, D (1986) Inside High School Grading Practices. Report no. 43, The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Program, 30 November. Portland, Oregon. Google Scholar | |
|
Tholin, J (2006) Att kunna klara sig i ökänd natur: En studie av betyg och betygskriterier - historiska betingelser och implementering av ett nytt system. [Being able to survive in an unknown environment: A study of grades and grading criteria- historical factors and the implication of a new system.] PhD Thesis, University College of Borås, Sweden. Google Scholar | |
|
Walker, BM, Winter, DA (2007) The elaboration of personal construct psychology. The Annual Review of Psychology 58(1): 453–477. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Young, S (2011) A survey of student assessment practice in physical education: Recommendations for grading. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators 24(6): 24–26. Google Scholar |
