![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This paper describes several practical activities that reveal how complex and nonlinear pedagogies might underpin primary physical education and school sport lessons. These sample activities, involving track and field, tennis and netball components, are designed to incorporate states of stability and instability through the modification of task and environmental constraints that challenge students to learn about movement. These activities challenge students individually and collectively to learn in relation to the cognitive, social, emotional and physical domains. Within these conditions, students are expected to ‘self-organise’ in order to take responsibility for their learning; this approach links with recent calls for a more expansive version of physical education supporting the holistic and lifelong development of physically active individuals. We further suggest that teachers using constraints-led pedagogies require high levels of capacity as they must draw upon their judgement, knowledge and teaching skills to appropriately facilitate and ‘scale’ dynamic learning contexts.
References
Section:
|
Almond, L (1986) Reflecting on themes: A games classification. In: Thorpe, RD, Bunker, DJ, Almond, L (eds) Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University, pp.71–72. Google Scholar | |
|
Atencio, M, Jess, M, Dewar, K (2012) It is a case of changing your thought processes, the way you actually teach: Implementing a complex professional learning agenda in Scottish Physical Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 17 (2): 127–144. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bailey, R (2005) Evaluating the relationship between physical education, sport and social inclusion. Educational Review 57(1): 71–90. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Barber, G (ed) (2005) Getting Started in Track and Field Athletics. Victoria: Trafford. Google Scholar | |
|
Biesta, G. (2010) Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In: Osberg, D, Biesta, G (eds) Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.5–14. Google Scholar | |
|
Biesta, G, Osberg, D (2010) Complexity, education and politics from the inside-out and the outside-in. In: Osberg, D, Biesta, G (eds) Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.1–3. Google Scholar | |
|
Bryant, JE (ed) (2008) Game/set/match: A Tennis Guide. Belmont, USA: Thomson Wadsworth. Google Scholar | |
|
Brymer, E, Renshaw, I (2010) An introduction to the constraints-led approach to learning in outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education 14(2): 33–41. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Chow, JY (2013) Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges and implications. Quest 65(4): 469–484. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chow, JY, Atencio, M (2012) Complex and nonlinear pedagogy and the implications for physical education. Sport, Education and Society, DOI: 1080/13573322.2012.728528. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Chow, JY, Davids, K, Button, C (2007) The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research 77(3): 251–278. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Chow, JY, Davids, K, Hristovski, R (2011) Nonlinear pedagogy: Learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas in Psychology 29: 189–200. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Crespo, M (2009) Tennis coaching in the era of dynamic systems. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis 14(3): 20–25. Google Scholar | |
|
Davids, K, Button, C, Bennett, S (2008) Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints- Led Approach, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, B, Sumara, D (2006) Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching and Research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Ellis, M (1983) Similarities and differences in games: A system for classification. In: Proceedings of the AIESEP International Congress in Teaching Team Sports. Rome, Italy: COMI-Scula dello Sport, pp.137–142. Google Scholar | |
|
Ewen, S (1981) Differences in coaching men's and women's high hurdles. In Javer, J (ed) The Hurdles. California: Tafnews Press, pp.73–77. Google Scholar | |
|
Hopper, T (2010) Complexity thinking: Creative dance creating conditions for student teachers to learn how to teach. PHENex 2(1): 1–20. Google Scholar | |
|
Jess, M, Atencio, M, Carse, N (2012) Introducing conditions of complexity in the context of Scottish PE. In: Ovens, A, Hopper, T, Butler, J (eds) Complexity Thinking in Physical Education: Reframing Curriculum, Pedagogy and Research, London: Routledge, pp.27–41. Google Scholar | |
|
Jess, M, Atencio, M, Thorburn, M (2011) Complexity theory: Supporting curriculum and pedagogy developments in Scottish physical education. Sport, Education and Society 16: 179–199. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jess, M, Dewar, K, Fraser, G (2004) Basic moves: Developing a foundation for lifelong physical activity. British Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 35(2): 23–27. Google Scholar | |
|
Kapur, M (2008) Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction 26(3): 379–424. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kirk, D, McPhail, A (2002) Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21(4): 177–192. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Larsson, H, Quennerstedt, M (2012) Understanding movement: A sociocultural approach to exploring moving humans. Quest 64(4): 283–298. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Light, R (2008) Complex learning theory: its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education 27(1): 21–37. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Light, R (2012) Understanding learning in competitive swimming as a complex phenomenon. In: Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Sydney, Australia, 4 December 2012. Google Scholar | |
|
Light, R, Harvey, S, Mouchet, A (2012) Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2012.665803. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Morgan, P, Bourke, S (2008) Non-specialist teachers’ confidence to teach PE: The nature and influence of personal school experiences in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 13(1): 1–29. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morrison, K (2006) Complexity theory and education. In: Asia Pacific Education Research Association annual conference, Hong Kong, 28–30 November 2006. Google Scholar | |
|
Morrison, K (2008) Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Education Philosophy and Theory 40(1): 19–34. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Newell, KM (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade, MG, Whiting, HTA (eds) Motor Skill Acquisition in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control. Amdsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff, pp.341–360. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Renshaw, I, Chappell, GS (2010) A constraints-led approach to talent development in cricket. In: Kidman, L, Lombardo, B (eds) Athlete-centred Coaching: Developing Decision Makers. Worcester: IPC Print Resources, pp.151–173. Google Scholar | |
|
Renshaw, I, Chow, JY, Davids, K (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2): 117–137. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sproule, J, Ollis, S, Gray, S (2011) Promoting perseverance and challenge in physical education: the missing ingredient for improved games teaching. Sport, Education and Society 16(5): 665–684. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Storey, B, Butler, J (2013) Complexity thinking in PE: game-centred approaches, games as complex adaptive systems, and ecological values. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 18(2): 133–149. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tan, CWK, Chow, JY, Davids, K (2012) ‘How does TGfU work?’ Examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 17(4): 331–348. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Thorburn, M, Jess, M, Atencio, M (2011) Thinking differently about curriculum: Analysing the potential contribution of physical education as part of health and wellbeing during a time of revised curriculum ambitions in Scotland. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 16(4): 383–398. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Thorpe, R, Bunker, D (1989) A Changing Focus in Games Teaching. In: Almond, L (ed) The Place of Physical Education in Schools. London: Kogan Page, pp.42–71. Google Scholar | |
|
Thorpe, R, Bunker, D, Almond, L (1984) A change in focus for the teaching of games. In: Pieron, M, Graham, G (eds) Sport Pedagogy: Olympic Scientific Congress Proceedings. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp.163–169. Google Scholar | |
|
Werner, P, Thorpe, R, Bunker, D (1996) Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 67(1): 28–33. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wright, J (2004) Critical inquiry and problem-solving in physical education. In: Wright, J, Macdonald, D, Burrows, L (eds) Critical Inquiry and Problem-solving in Physical Education. London: Routledge, pp.3–15. Google Scholar | |
|
Wright, J, Burrows, L (2006) Re-conceiving ability in physical education: a social analysis. Sport, Education and Society 11(3): 275–291. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
