![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This paper explores the tacit expert knowledge and understanding about games curriculum and pedagogy of three men, Len Almond, David Bunker, and Rod Thorpe, credited as the founders of the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model. The model emerged from teacher practice in the late 1970s and was little theorized at the time, apart from a handful of articles written by the founders. This paper attempts to retrospectively theorize and represent the founders’ ideas in terms of the beliefs, intentions, and actions they believed to be fundamental to TGfU. From here, some benchmarks are proposed so that TGfU can be more easily recognized when it is being practised and researched. Data were collected through two online sequential questionnaires, informal personal telephone interviews, and emails. All data were member checked throughout the two-year study. Both of the questionnaires were completed by the three founders in the persona of their ‘ideal’ TGfU teacher, in the hope that this would lead to greater clarity of response. The first questionnaire, called the Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI), was developed by Daniel Pratt and builds a profile of teacher beliefs, intentions, and actions, which are then grouped into five perspectives and ranked by personal bias. Questions posed on SurveyGizmo formed the second questionnaire, which helped the founders reflect further about their ideal teacher’s beliefs, intentions, and actions, as they became apparent in the dominant and recessive perspectives identified in the TPI profiles. The findings were grouped into the founders’ beliefs and intentions about: (1) learners and learning; (2) content; and (3) teachers’ role and responsibilities. The data forming what the founders’ considered to be best pedagogical practice formed eight areas for consideration to include: (1) preparation; (2) management; (3) starting a TGfU lesson; (4) continuing a TGfU lesson; (5) teacher behaviours; teacher focus during a game; (7) teacher expectations; and (8) learning environment. This paper aims to provide a starting point for further research, debate, and reflection as we engage with the founders’ intentions – to provide students with teaching that is an overt social, cultural, and relational activity, as well as a set of plans, practices, and actions.
References
|
Aerts, DL, Apostel, B, De Moor, S (1994) Worldviews: From Fragmentation to Integration. Brussels: VUB Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Almond, L (1986) Asking teachers to research. In: Thorpe, R, Bunker, D, Almond, L (eds) Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough UK: Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences University of Technology, pp.35–44. Google Scholar | |
|
Bhabha, HK (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Bruner, J (1966) Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University. Google Scholar | |
|
Bunker, D, Thorpe, R (1982) A model for teaching games in secondary schools. British Journal of Physical Education 13: 5–8. Google Scholar | |
|
Bunker, D, Thorpe, R (eds) (1983) Themed Edition: Games teaching revisited. Bulletin of Physical Education 19(1). Google Scholar | |
|
Butler, J (2012) Conceptualizing teaching games for understanding by revisiting foundations. Keynote presentation given at International Conference (5th) of Teaching Games for Understanding, Loughborough University UK, 14 July 2012. Google Scholar | |
|
Butler, J, Oslin, J, Mitchell, S (2008) The way forward for TGfU: Filling the chasm between theory and practice. Physical & Health Education Journal 74(2): 6–12. Google Scholar | |
|
Butler, J, Storey, B, Robson, C (2012) Emergent learning focused teachers and their ecological complexity worldview. Sport, Education and Society. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Capel, S, Blair, R (2013) Why do physical education teachers adopt a particular way of teaching? In: Capel, S, Whitehead, M (eds) Debates in Physical Education. London and New York: Routledge, pp.120–139. Google Scholar | |
|
Chen, A, Ennis, CD, Loftus, S (1997) Refining the value orientation inventory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 68(4): 352–356. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Chow, JY, Davids, K, Button, C (2007) The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research 77(3): 251–278. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Collin, H (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Collins, J, Pratt, D (2011) The teaching perspectives inventory at 10 years and 100,000 respondents: Reliability and validity of a teacher self-report inventory. Adult Education Quarterly 61(4): 358–375. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Davis, B, Sumara, D,, Luce-Kapler, R (2008) Engaging minds: Changing teaching in complex times. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Grehaigne, J, Godbout, P (1997) Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16: 500–516. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Grehaigne, J, Godbout, P (1998) Formative assessment in team sports in a tactical approach context. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 69(1): 46–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Grehaigne, JF, Richard, JF, Griffin, LL (2005) Teaching and Learning Team Sports and Games. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Google Scholar | |
|
Grehaigne, JF, Richard, JF, Griffin, LL (2012) Teaching and Learning Team Sports and Games. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Griffin, L, Mitchell, S, Oslin, J (1997) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Harvey, S, Jarrett, K (2013) A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Hubball, H, Collin, J, Pratt, D (2005) Enhancing reflective teaching practices: Implication for faculty development programs. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 35(3): 57–81. Google Scholar | |
|
Jarvis-Selinger, S, Collins, JB, Pratt, DD (2007) Do academic origins influence perspectives on teaching? Teacher Education Quarterly 34(3): 67–81. Google Scholar | |
|
Jewett, AE, Bain, LL, Ennis, CD (1995) The Curriculum Process in Physical Education. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark. Google Scholar | |
|
Kirk, D, Tinning, R (1992) Physical education pedagogical work as praxis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research association, San Francisco, CA. Google Scholar | |
|
Launder, A (2001) Play Practice: The Games Approach to Teaching and Coaching Sport. Adelaide: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Launder, A, Piltz, W (2013) Play Practice: Engaging and Developing Skilled Players from Beginner to Elite. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Light, R (2013) Game Sense: Pedagogy for Performance Participation and Enjoyment. Routledge Studies in Physical Education and Youth Sport. Oxen Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Mesquita, I, Farias, C, Hastie, P (2012) The impact of a hybrid sport education–invasion games competence model soccer unit on students decision making skill execution and overall game performance. European Physical Education Review 18(2): 205–219. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Mitchell, S, Griffin, L, Oslin, J (2006) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Mitchell, S, Oslin, J, Griffin, L (2003) Sport Foundations for Elementary Physical Education: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Mitchell, S, Oslin, J, Griffin, L (2013) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach for Ages 7 to 18 (3rd edn). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar | |
|
Oslin, J, Mitchell, S (2006) Game-Centred Approaches to Teaching Physical Education. In: Kirk, D, MacDonald, D, O’Sullivan, M (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: SAGE, pp.627–651. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Parsaye, K, Chignell, M (1988) Expert Systems for Experts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Penney, D, Evans, J (1995) Changing structures; changing rules: The development of the ‘internal market’. School Organisation 15(1): 13–21. Google Scholar | |
|
Petrina, S (2004) The politics of curriculum and instructional design/theory/form: Critical problems, projects, units and modules. Interchange 35(1): 81–126. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Piaget, J (1997) The Child’s Conception of the World: Selected Works. Abingdon, Oxen: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Pinar, W (2012) What is Curriculum Theory? New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Polanyi, M (1967) The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar | |
|
Pratt, DD and Associates (1998) Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company. Google Scholar | |
|
Pratt, DD, Collins, JB, Jarvis-Selinger, S (2001) Development and use of the teaching perspectives inventory (TPI). Presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington, April 2001. Google Scholar | |
|
Rossi, T, Fry, JM, McNeill, M (2006) The games concept approach (GCA) as a mandated practice: Views of Singaporean teachers. Sport Education and Society 12(1): 93–111. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sparkes, A (1991) The culture of teaching, critical reflection, and change: Possibilities and problems. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 19(4): 4–19. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Stolz, SA, Pill, S (2014) Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review 20(1): 36–71. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tallir, IB, Musch, E, Lenoir, M (2003) Assessment of game play in basketball. Paper presented at The 2nd International TGfU Conference: Teaching sport and physical education, Melbourne, University of Melbourne, 11-14 December 2003. Google Scholar | |
|
Tallir, IB, Musch, E, Valcke, M (2005) Effects of two instructional approaches for basketball on decision-making and recognition ability. International Journal of Sport Psychology 36: 107–126. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Thorpe, R (1996) Physical Education: Beyond the curriculum. In: Armstrong N (ed) New Directions in Physical Education: Change and Innovation, London: Cassell, pp.144–156. Google Scholar | |
|
Thorpe, R (2005) Rod Thorpe on teaching games for understanding. In: Kidman, L (ed) Athlete-Centred Coaching: Developing and Inspiring People. Christchurch, NZ: Innovative Print Communications Ltd, pp.229–244. Google Scholar | |
|
Thorpe, R, Bunker, D (1986) Where are we now? A games education. In: Thorpe, R, Bunker, D, Almond, L (eds) Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough, UK: Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences University of Technology, pp.35–44. Google Scholar | |
|
Thorpe, R, Bunker, D (2010) Preface. In: Butler, J, Griffin, L (eds) More Teaching Games for Understanding: Moving Globally. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp.vii–xv. Google Scholar | |
|
Thorpe, R, Bunker, D, Almond, L (eds) (1986) Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough, UK: Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences University of Technology. Google Scholar | |
|
Tsoukas, H (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In: Easterby-Smith, M, Lyles, MA (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell, pp.410–427. Google Scholar | |
|
Vygotsky, LS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Boston: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar |
