The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between student grades and assessment for learning (AfL) in physical education. In educational literature, the focus on formative assessment has grown dramatically, partly because research indicates that good AfL is one of the most effective instructional tools to drive student learning forward. Therefore, a positive influence of AfL on students’ grades was hypothesised. The study employed a questionnaire of 1454 PE students (aged 15–19 years) from six upper secondary schools in Norway. Based on theory and factor analysis, a construct to map the experience with AfL was identified. A regression model was used to analyse the relationship between the construct and students’ grades, demonstrating that AfL is negatively associated with student grades. While the main finding is statistically small, the study also discusses the influence of other variables, possible explanations for the results and related implications.

Annerstedt, C (2010) Karaktersetting i kroppsøving: Problematisk, urettferdig og neppe likeverdig [Grading in physical education: Problematic, unfair and probably inequal]. In: Steinsholt, K, Gurholt, KP (eds) Aktive liv: Idrettspedagogiske perspektiver på kropp, bevegelse og dannelse. Trondheim: Tapir, pp.233254.
Google Scholar
Annerstedt, C, Larsson, S (2010) ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are…’ Grading in Swedish PEH – problems of validity, comparability and fairness. European Physical Education Review 16(2): 97115.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Arnesen, TE, Nilsen, AK, Leirhaug, PE (2013) ‘Den læreplanen som ikkje kan tilpassast mi undervisning, finst ikkje.’ Vurdering og undervisning i kroppsøving etter Kunnskapsløftet [Assessment and teaching in physical education after the Knowledge Promotion Act 2006 ]. Tidsskriftet FOU i praksis 7(3): 932.
Google Scholar
Assessment Reform Group (2002) Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Available at: http://assessmentreformgroup.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/10principles_english.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
Google Scholar
Bennet, RE (2011) Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18(1): 525.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berry, R (2010) Teachers’ orientations towards selecting assessment strategies. New Horizons in Education 58(1): 96107.
Google Scholar
Black, P, Wiliam, D (1998a) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5(1): 773.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Black, P, Wiliam, D (1998b) Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2): 139148.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bryman, A (2012) Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Carless, D (2010) Prospects of implementing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 12(1): 3954.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carrol, B (1994) Assessment in Physical Education: A Teacher’s Guide to the Issues. London: Falmer.
Google Scholar
Chan, K, Hay, P, Tinning, R (2011) Understanding the pedagogic discourse of assessment in Physical Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 2(1): 319.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chatzopoulos, D, Erdmann, R, Tsormbatzoudis, H (2006) Pupils’ grading: Do teachers grade according to the way they report? International Journal of Physical Education 43(1): 410.
Google Scholar
Dale, EL (2008). Fellesskolen – Reproduksjon av Sosial Ulikhet [One School for All – Reproduction of Social Inequality]. Oslo: Cappelen.
Google Scholar
Ding, H, Sun, H, Chen, A (2013) Impact of expectancy-value and situational interest motivation specificity on physical education outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 32(3): 253269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dunn, KE, Mulvenon, SW (2009) A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14(7): 111.
Google Scholar
Dyson, B (2014) Quality physical education: A commentary on effective physical education teaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 85(2): 144152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Eide, LH (2011) Vurdering for læring i kroppsøving [Assessment for learning in physical education]. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Google Scholar
Engvik, G (2010) Elevvurdering i faget kroppsøving – Noen utfordringer. [Student assessment in physical education – Some challenges.] In: Dobsen, S, Engh, R (eds) Vurdering for Læring i Fag. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget, pp.201213.
Google Scholar
Ericsson, I (2011) Effects of increased physical activity on motor skills and marks in physical education: an intervention study in school years 1 through 9 in Sweden. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 16(3): 313329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Field, A (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Gardner J (ed) (2012) Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Georgakis, S, Wilson, R (2012) Australian physical education and school sport: An exploration into contemporary assessment. Asian Journal of Exercise & Sport Science 9(1): 3752.
Google Scholar
Green, K (2008) Understanding Physical Education. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Harlen, W (2012) On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In: Gardner, J (ed) Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp.87102.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hattie, J (2009) Visible Learning. A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analysis Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Hattie, J, Timperley, H (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77(1): 81112.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hay, P (2006) Assessment for learning in physical education. In: Kirk, D, Macdonald, D, O’Sullivan, M (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, pp.312325.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hay, P, Macdonald, D (2008) (Mis)appropriations of criteria and standards referenced assessment in a performance-based subject. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 15(2): 153168.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hay, P, Penney, D (2013) Assessment in Physical Education. A Sociocultural Perspective. New York/Oxon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Jakkola, TT, Sääkslahti, A, Yli-Piipari, S. (2013) Student motivation associated with fitness testing in the physical education context. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 32(3): 270286.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Klapp Lekholm, A (2008) Grades and grade assignment: Effects of student and school characteristics. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, Vol. 269. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Google Scholar
Klenowski, V, Wyatt-Smith, C (2014) Assessment for Education: Standards, Judgments and Moderation. London: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Klomsten, AT (2013) Hvordan organiseres kroppsøvingsfaget i norske skoler: Kjønnsblandet eller kjønnsdelt? [How is the teaching of boys and girls organized in Norwegian physical education?] Tidsskriftet FOU i praksis 7(3): 5982.
Google Scholar
Larsson, H, Redelius, K (eds) (2004) Mellan nytta och nöje: bilder av ämnet idrott och hälsa. [Between Benefit and joy: Pictures of the Subject PE and Health.] Stockholm: GIH.
Google Scholar
Leirhaug, PE, MacPhail, A (2015) ‘It’s the other assessment that is the key’: three Norwegian physical education teachers’ engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society 20(5): 624640.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
MacPhail, A, Halbert, J (2010) ‘We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE’: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 17(1): 2339.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Matenin, M, Tannehill, D (1994) Assessment and grading in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 13(4): 395405.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McMillan, JH (2003) Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision-making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice 22(4): 3443.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Melograno, VJ (2007) Grading and report cards for standard-based physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 78(6): 4553.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Muijs, D (2011) Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Møller, J, Prøitz, TS, Aasen, P (eds) (2009) Kunnskapsløftet – tung bør å bære [the Knowledge Promotion – an evaluation report]. Report 42/09. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
Google Scholar
Nordenbo, SE, Larsen, MS, Tiftikçi, N. (2008) Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i førskole og skole. [Teacher Competence and Students’ Learning in Schools.] København: Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning.
Google Scholar
Palm, T (2014) Assessing with Foucault. A critical study of assessment in physical education. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Google Scholar
Peev, OD (2001) Nasjonal standard i vurderingen – realitet, visjon eller luftspeiling? [National standard in assessment – reality or not?]. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Google Scholar
Penney, D, Brooker, R, Hay, P. (2009) Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: Three message systems of Schooling and dimensions of quality physical education. Sport, Education and Society 14(4): 421444.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pryor, J, Crossouard, B (2008) A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education 34(1): 120.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Prøitz, TS, Borgen, JS (2010) Rettferdig standpunktvurdering – det (u)muliges kunst? [Fair grading – an (im)possible art?]. Report 16/2010. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
Google Scholar
Pühse, U, Gerber, M (eds) (2005) International Comparison of Physical Education: Concepts, Problems, Prospects. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport.
Google Scholar
Redelius, K, Hay, P (2009) Defining, acquiring and transacting cultural capital through assessment in physical education. European Physical Education Review 15(3): 275294.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Redelius, K, Hay, P (2012) Student views on criterion-referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 17(2): 211225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ringdal, K (2013) Enhet og mangfold. Samfunnsvitenskaplig forskning og kvantitativ metode [Oneness and manyfold. Social science and quantitative method]. 3rd ed. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Google Scholar
Ryan, RM, Deci, EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1): 6878.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Sadler, DR (1998) Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5(1): 7785.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sandvik, LV, Engvik, G, Fjørtoft, H. (2012) Vurdering i skolen. Intensjoner og forståelser – Delrapport 1. [Assessment in the School. Intentions and understandings – Report 1.] Trondheim: NTNU. Available at: http://www.udir.no/Upload/Rapporter/2012/fivis.pdf?epslanguage=no (accessed 14 December 2012).
Google Scholar
Smith, K (2009) Samspillet mellom vurdering og motivasjon. [The interplay between assessment and motivation.] In: Dobson, S, Eggen, A, Smith, K (eds) Vurdering, prinsipper og praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal, pp.2339.
Google Scholar
Smith, K (2011) Professional development of teachers – A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37(1): 5561.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Steffensen, K, Ziade, SE (2008) Skoleresultater 2008: En kartlegging av karakterer fra grunnskoler og videregående skoler i Norge. [School results 2008: A study of grades in Norwegian schools.] Report 2009/23. Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
Google Scholar
Svennberg, L, Meckbach, J, Redelius, K (2014) Exploring PE teachers’ ‘gut feelings’: An attempt to verbalise and discuss teachers’ internalised grading criteria. European Physical Education Review 20(2): 199214.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thorburn, M (2008) Articulating a Merleau-Pontian phenomenology of physical education: The quest for active student engagement and authentic assessment in high-stakes examination awards. European Physical Education Review 14(4): 263280.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tinning, R (2010) Pedagogy and Human Movement: Theory, Practice, Research. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Troullioud, DO, Sarrazin, PG, Martinek, JJ. (2002) The influence of teacher expectations on student achievement in physical education classes: Pygmalion revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology 32(5): 591607.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tveit, S (2014) Educational assessment in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 21(2): 221237.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Utdanningsdirektoratet (2011) Grunnlagsdokument: Satsingen Vurdering for læring 2010-2014. [Background document: Assessment for learning 2010-2014.] Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet. Available at: http://www.udir.no/PageFiles/Vurdering%20for%20laring/Dokumenter/Nasjonal%20satsing/2/Grunnlagsdokument%20for%20satsingen%20Vurdering%20for%20l%c3%a6ring%20okt%20%2020111.pdf (accessed 18 July 2013).
Google Scholar
van der Mars, H, Harvey, S (2010) Teaching and assessing racquet games using ‘play practice’. Part 2: Integrating assessment into teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 81(5): 3543.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Vinje, E (2008) Osloundersøkelsen om vurdering i kroppsøving [The Oslo Study of Assessment in Physical Education]. Nøtterøy: Ped-media AS.
Google Scholar
Young, S (2011) A survey of student assessment practice in physical education. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators 24(6): 2426.
Google Scholar
Zhu, X (2015) Student perspectives of grading in physical education. European Physical Education Review. Epub ahead of print 10 February 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X15569628.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EPE-article-ppv for $36.00