The question of physical interaction is especially relevant in school physical education, where a lot of the teaching and activities are based on body movements. However, the issue of ‘touching’ has been questioned in recent years. This paper takes its starting point in the discourse of child protection and the growing anxiety around intergenerational touch in educational settings. The purpose is to examine PE teachers’ self-regulation in relation to the child protection discourse and no touch policies. What sort of strategies have the teachers developed for dealing with physical contact in their teaching? It is a matter of problematising teachers’ pedagogical interactions in PE practice.

The study takes its starting point in a discourse-analytical tradition using a methodology based on Foucault’s ideas about governmentality. Twenty-three teachers (10 women and 13 men) aged 30–63 and at different stages in their careers were interviewed. The results show two different self-regulating processes: (1) adaptation using avoidance-oriented strategies and (2) resistance using downplaying-oriented strategies. The paper discusses potential consequences for PE teachers’ pedagogical work if they feel that they have to protect themselves instead of operating in a way that is in the best interest for students’ learning and development. The study aims to contribute to the literature on child protection and ‘no touch’ policies and to a more multifaceted understanding of physical interaction in PE.

Andrzejewski, CE, Davis, HA (2008) Human contact in the classroom: Exploring how teachers talk about and negotiate touching students. Teaching and Teacher Education 24(3): 779794.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bell, V (1993) Interrogating Incest: Feminism, Foucault, and the Law. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Casey, A, Quennerstedt, M (2015) “I just remember rugby” – Remembering physical education as more than a sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 86(1): 4050.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Fasting, K (2005) Research on sexual harassment and abuse in sport. Idrottsforum.org. [Nordic Sport Science Forum] www.idrottsforum.org5/4/2005
Google Scholar
Fletcher, S (2013) Touching practice and physical education: Deconstruction of a contemporary moral panic. Sport, Education and Society 18(5): 694709.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Foucault, M (1978/1991)Governmentality. In: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, Miller, P (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.87104.
Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1988) Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and other Writings, 1977–1984 Kritzman, LD (ed.). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1994) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. I). Rabinow, P (ed.) Hurley, R. (tr.). London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vintage, New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Garratt, D, Piper, H, Taylor, B (2013) ‘Safeguarding’ sports coaching: Foucault, genealogy and critique. Sport, Education and Society 18(5): 615629.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gordon, C (1991) Governmental rationality. An Introduction. In: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, Miller, P (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.151.
Google Scholar
Johnson, RT (2014) 3 Training ‘safe’ bodies in an era of child panic in the United States. Touch in Sports Coaching and Physical Education: Fear, Risk and Moral Panic, 35.
Google Scholar
Jones, A (2001) Touchy Subject: Teachers Touching Children. Dunedin, N.Z.: Otago University Press.
Google Scholar
Jones, A (2004) Social anxiety, sex, surveillance, and the ‘safe’teacher. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25(1): 5366.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nealon, J (2008) Foucault beyond Foucault: Power and its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Öhman, M, Grundberg Sandell, C (2015) The pedagogical consequences of ‘no touching’ in physical education – The case of Sweden. In: Piper, H (ed.) Touch in Sports Coaching and Physical Education: Fear, Risk and Moral Panic. Oxon/New York: Routledge, pp.7084.
Google Scholar
Öhman, M, Quennerstedt, A (2015) Questioning the no-touch discourse in physical education from a children’s rights perspective. Sport, Education and Society. Epub ahead of print: DOI:10.1080/13573322.2015.1030384. Available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573322.2015.1030384#abstract
Google Scholar
Piper, H (2015) (Ed.) Touch in Sports Coaching and Physical Education: Fear, Risk and Moral Panic. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Piper, H, Smith, H (2003) ‘Touch’ in educational and child care settings: Dilemmas and responses. British Educational Research Journal 29(6): 879894.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Piper, H, Garratt, D, Taylor, B (2013a) Hands off! The practice and politics of touch in physical education and sports coaching. Sport, Education and Society 18(5): 575582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Piper, H, Garratt, D, Taylor, B (2013b) Child abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’ in PE teaching and sports coaching. Sport, Education and Society 18(5): 583598.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Piper, H, Taylor, B, Garratt, D (2015)Hands-off PE teaching and sports coaching in the UK. In: Piper, H (ed.) Touch in Sports Coaching and Physical Education: Fear, Risk and Moral Panic. Oxon/New York: Routledge, pp.1434.
Google Scholar
Pope, CC (2015) Risk, fear and the ‘greyness’ of touch. In: Piper, H (ed.) Touch in Sports Coaching and Physical Education: Fear, Risk and Moral Panic. Oxon/New York: Routledge, pp.5269.
Google Scholar
Rose, N (1998) Inventing our Selves. Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Rose, N (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taylor, WG, Piper, H, Garratt, D (2014) Sports coaches as ‘dangerous individuals’ – Practice as governmentality. Sport, Education and Society. Epub ahead of print: DOI:10.1080/13573322.2014.899492
Google Scholar
WOSM/WAGGGS (2007) Child Protection Tool Kit. A joint project of the WSB – European Regional Office and the Europe Region WAGGGS. The World Organization of the Scout Movement, European Region: Geneva.
Google Scholar
Wright, J, Halse, C (2014) The healthy child citizen: Biopedagogies and web-based health promotion. British Journal of Sociology of Education 35(6): 837855.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EPE-article-ppv for $36.00