The organisers of the 2012 London Olympics have endeavoured explicitly to use the Games to inspire a generation. This is nothing short of putting the main claim of Olympism to the test, but surprisingly the Inspire project has received virtually no scholarly scrutiny. Using an educationally-informed view of inspiration, this paper interrogates the official evaluations of the London 2012 Inspire programme from a realist evaluation perspective and asks what are the theory, mechanisms and outcomes of the programme. It also considers the relationship between evidence, research and policy making in the context of the Olympic Games as an educational project. It is contended that the official evaluations of the Inspire programme failed to provide answers to the key questions of why, how and under what conditions the programme effects have occurred and for whom. In this way they further perpetuate the mythical powers of the Olympics to change young people’s behaviour through sport on the basis of highly problematic evidence.

Allender, S, Cowburn, G, Foster, C (2006) Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Education Research 21(6): 826835.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Australian Sport Commission (2009) The future of sport report (Crawford Report). Canberra: ASC.
Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R (1978) A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
Google Scholar
Bowen, G (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 2740.
Google Scholar | Crossref
British Olympic Association (BOA) (2005) London 2012: Response to the questionnaire for cities applying to become candidate cities to host the Games of the XXX Olympiad and the Paralympic Games in 2012. London: BOA.
Google Scholar
Bunt, K, Llewellyn-Thomas, S, Campbell-Hall, V. (2011) Schools’ and Colleges’ Engagement with the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: PE and Sport. London: Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Caulley, D (1983) Document analysis in programme evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6: 1929.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coakley, J (2001) Sport in Society – Issues and Controversies. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Coakley, J, Souza, D (2013) Sport mega-events: can legacies and development be equitable and sustainable? Motriz, Rio Claro 19(3): 580589.
Google Scholar
Coalter, F (2009) Sport-in-development: accountability or development? In: Levermore, R, Beakom, A (eds) Sport and International Development. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.5575.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coalter, F (2013) Sport for Development: What Game are we Playing? London: Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coe, S (2012) Foreword. LOCOG Annual Report. London: LOCOG.
Google Scholar
Darnell, S (2010) Power, politics and sport for development and peace: investigating the utility of sport for international development. Sociology of Sport Journal 27(1): 5475.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Department of Media, Culture and Sport (DCMS) (2007) Our Promise for 2012: How the UK will Benefit from the Olympic and Paralympic Games. London: DCMS.
Google Scholar
Department of Media, Culture and Sport (DCMS) (2008) Before, during and after: Making the most of the London 2012 Games. London: DCMS.
Google Scholar
Department of Media, Culture and Sport (DCMS) (2013) Report 5: Post-Games Evaluation. Meta-Evaluation of the Impacts and Legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: Summary Report. London: DCMS.
Google Scholar
France, J, Jenkins, S (2013) Final Report Evaluation of International Inspiration. London: Ecorys.
Google Scholar
Garcia, B (2012) London 2012 Cultural Olympiad Evaluation: Final Report. University of Liverpool: Liverpool.
Google Scholar
Girginov, V (2012) Governance of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. In: Girginov, V (ed.) Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Volume One: Making the Games. London: Routledge, pp.130134.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Girginov, V (2013) Researching and writing about the London Olympics. In: Girginov, V (ed.) Handbook of the London 2012 Olypmic and Paralympic Games. Volume Two: Celebrating the Games. London: Routledge, pp.117.
Google Scholar
Girginov, V, Hills, L (2008) A sustainable sports legacy: creating a link between the London Olympics and sports participation. The International Journal of the History of Sport 25(14): 20912117.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Girginov, V, Olsen, N (2013) LOCOG: a temporary organisation within a high-velocity environment. In: Girginov, V (ed.) Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Volume 2: Celebrating the Games. Routledge: London, pp.7183.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gratton, C, Kokolakakis, T (2012) The effects of the current economic conditions on sport participation. A report. Sport Industry Research Centre, UK.
Google Scholar
Giulianotti, R, Robertson, R (2004) The globalization of football: a study in the glocalization of the ‘serious life’. The British Journal of Sociology 55(4): 545568.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Hartmann, D, Kwauk, C (2011) Sport and development: an overview, critique, and reconstruction. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 35(3): 284305.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Henry, G, Mark, M, Julns, G (1998) Realist evaluation: an emerging theory in support of practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 78, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Hughes, K (2013) Sport mega-event and a legacy of increased sport participation: an Olympic promise or an Olympic dream? PhD Thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK
Google Scholar
IOC (2015) The Contribution of Sport to the Sustainable Development Goals and the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: IOC.
Google Scholar
IPC (2014). The IPC – Who we are. Available at: http://www.paralympic.org/TheIPC/HWA/AboutUs (accessed 2 February 2014).
Google Scholar
Johnson, F, Fraser, J, Ganesh, G. (2008) The London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games – Children and Young People’s Perceptions and Involvement. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Google Scholar
Knight, J, Kavanah, P, Page, D (2013) London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games: Inspire Programme Legacy Survey: United Kingdom. London: Kavanah, Knight and Page.
Google Scholar
Levermore, R (2008) Sport: a new engine of development? Progress in Development Studies 8(2): 18390.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
LOCOG (2007) London 2012 Annual Update. London: LOCOG.
Google Scholar
LOCOG (2008) On Track. Annual Report 2007–2008. London: LOCOG.
Google Scholar
LOCOG (2011) London 2012 Inspire Programme. London: LOCOG.
Google Scholar
LOCOG/Nielsen (2012) Inspire Programme: Key Facts and Figures. London: LOCOG.
Google Scholar
MacAloon, J (2008) ‘Legacy’ as managerial/magical discourse in contemporary Olympic affairs. International Journal of the History of Sport 25(4): 20602071.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McFee, G (2012) The Promise of Olympism. In: Sugden, J, Tomlinson, A (eds) Watching the Olympics: Power, Politics and Representation. London: Routledge, pp.3652.
Google Scholar
McNeill, D (2006) The diffusion of ideas in development theory and policy. Global Social Policy 6(3): 334354.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Martinkova, I (2012) Fair or temple: two possibilities for Olympic sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6(2): 166182.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Merton, R (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (2011) Managing. New York: FT Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Mutter, F, Pawlowski, T (2014) Role models in sports – can success in professional sports increase the demand for amateur sport participation? Sport Management Review 17(3): 324336.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
ONS (2011) Internet Access – Households and Individuals. London: ONS.
Google Scholar
Patton, M (1987) Evaluation political inherency. Practical implications for design and use. In: Palumbo, DJ (ed.) The Politics of Programme Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp.100145.
Google Scholar
Patton, M (2011) Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Pawson, R (2013) The Science of Evaluation. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Payne, W, Reynolds, M, Brown, S. (2003) Sports Role Models and their Impact on Participation in Physical Activity: A Literature Review. University of Ballarat: Ballarat.
Google Scholar
Phenix, P (1963) Educational theory and inspiration. Educational Theory 13(1): 164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ramchandani, G, Coleman, R (2012) The inspirational effects of three major sport events. International Journal of Events and Festivals Management 3(3): 257271.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reid, H, Evangeliou, C (2010) The political heritage of the Olympic Games: Relevance, risks, and possible rewards. In: Proceedings: International Symposium for Olympic Research. London: University of Western Ontario.
Google Scholar
Robson, C (2011) Real World Research (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Rossi, P (1987) The iron law of evaluation and other metallic rules. In Miller, JL, Lewis, M (eds) Research in Social Problems and Public Policy: A Research Annual (Vol. 4) New York: Jai Press, pp.320.
Google Scholar
Rowe, N, Adams, R, Beasley, N (2004) Driving up Participation in Sport: The Social Context, the Trends, the Prospects and the Challenges. London: Sport England.
Google Scholar
SAGE (2014) Olympic Games Impact (OGI) Study – RIO 2016 Initial Report to Measure the Impacts and the Legacy of the Rio 2016 Games: Rio de Janeiro: SAGE/COPPE/UFRJ Research Team.
Google Scholar
Sawyer, J (1999) Theories of inspiration. Available at: http://www.bible.org/docs/theology/biblio/theorins.htm (accessed 21 January 2014).
Google Scholar
Sinclair, I (2012) Ghost Milk: Calling Time on the Grand Project. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Google Scholar
Spivey, N (2011) Pythagoras and the origin of Olympic ideology. In: Girginov, V (ed.) Olympic Studies, Vol. 1. Origins and Revival of the Modern Olympic Games. London: Routledge, pp.2139.
Google Scholar
Sport England (2015) The national picture. Active people survey results. Available at: http://www.sportengland.org/research/who-plays-sport/national-picture/ (accessed 18 June 2015).
Google Scholar
Sugden, J, Tomlinson, A (2012) ‘No other anything…’: The Olympic Games yesterday and today. In: Sugden, J, Tomlinson, A (eds) Watching the Olympics: Power, Politics and Representation. Routledge: London, pp.242251.
Google Scholar
Turner, V (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Weed, M (2013) London 2012 legacy strategy. Did it deliver? In Girginov, V (ed.) Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (Vol 2). London: Routledge, pp.281294.
Google Scholar
Weed, M (2014) Is tourism a legitimate legacy strategy from the Olympic and Paralympic Games? An analysis of London 2012 legacy strategy using programme theory. Journal of Sport and Tourism 19(2): 101126.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Weed, M, Coren, E, Fiore, J. (2015) The Olympic Games and raising sport participation: a systematic review of evidence and an integration of policy for a demonstration effect. European Sport Management Quarterly 15(2): 195226.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Weiss, C (1979) The many meanings of research utilisation. Public Administration Review September/October: 426431.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Weiss, C (2000) Which links in which theories should we evaluate? In: Rogers, P, Hacsi, T, Petrosino, A. (eds). Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities (New Directions for Evaluation, 87). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Google Scholar
West, G (1749) Odes of Pindar, with several other Pieces in Prose and Verse, Translated from the Greek. To which is prefixed A Dissertation on the Olympick Games. London (1749, 1753, 1766).
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EPE-article-ppv for $36.00