The development and potential of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for carotid artery plaque characterization
Abstract
Stroke is the third leading cause of death and long-term disability in the USA. Currently, surgical intervention decisions in asymptomatic patients are based upon the degree of carotid artery stenosis. While there is a clear benefit of endarterectomy for patients with severe (> 70%) stenosis, in those with high/moderate (50–69%) stenosis the evidence is less clear. Evidence suggests ischemic stroke is associated less with calcified and fibrous plaques than with those containing softer tissue, especially when accompanied by a thin fibrous cap. A reliable mechanism for the identification of individuals with atherosclerotic plaques which confer the highest risk for stroke is fundamental to the selection of patients for vascular interventions. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is a new ultrasonic-based imaging method that characterizes the mechanical properties of tissue by measuring displacement resulting from the application of acoustic radiation force. These displacements provide information about the local stiffness of tissue and can differentiate between soft and hard areas. Because arterial walls, soft tissue, atheromas, and calcifications have a wide range in their stiffness properties, they represent excellent candidates for ARFI imaging. We present information from early phantom experiments and excised human limb studies to in vivo carotid artery scans and provide evidence for the ability of ARFI to provide high-quality images which highlight mechanical differences in tissue stiffness not readily apparent in matched B-mode images. This allows ARFI to identify soft from hard plaques and differentiate characteristics associated with plaque vulnerability or stability.
References
1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: e69–171.
2. Timsit S, Sacco R, Mohr J, et al. Early clinical differentiation of cerebral infarction from severe atherosclerotic stenosis and cardioembolism. Stroke 2007; 23: 486–491.
3. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial C. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445–453.
4. Warlow C. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235–1243.
5. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421–1428.
6. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1415–1425.
7. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Analysis of poo-led data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003; 361: 107–116.
8. Golledge J, Siew DA. Identifying the carotid ‘high risk’ plaque: is it still a riddle wrapped up in an enigma? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 2–8.
9. Gomez CR. Carotid plaque morphology and risk for stroke. Stroke 1990; 21: 148–151.
10. Nandalur KR, Baskurt E, Hagspiel KD, et al. Carotid artery calcification on CT may independently predict stroke risk. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 547–552.
11. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y-H, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1276–1282.
12. Tearney GJ, Yabushita H, Houser SL, et al. Quantification of macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2003; 107: 113–119.
13. Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res 2001; 89: 305–316.
14. Ge J, Chirillo F, Schwedtmann J, et al. Screening of ruptured plaques in patients with coronary artery disease by intravascular ultrasound. Heart 1999; 81: 621–627.
15. AbuRahma AF, Thiele SP, John T, Wulu J. Prospective controlled study of the natural history of asymptomatic 60% to 69% carotid stenosis according to ultrasonic plaque morphology. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36: 437–442.
16. Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ, Nicolaides AN, et al. Hemispheric symptoms and carotid plaque echomorphology. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: 39–49.
17. Tegos TJ, Stavropoulos P, Sabetai MM, Khodabakhsh P, Sassano A, Nicolaides AN. Determinants of carotid plaque instability: echoicity versus heterogeneity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 22: 22–30.
18. Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Pare GJ, Stevens JM. Reproducibility of computer-quantified carotid plaque echogenicity: can we overcome the subjectivity? Stroke 2000; 31: 2189–2196.
19. Tearney GJ, Jang I-K, Bouma BE. Optical coherence tomography for imaging the vulnerable plaque. J Biomed Opt 2006; 11: 021002.
20. Prabhudesai V, Phelan C, Yang Y, Wang RK, Cowling MG. The potential role of optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of vulnerable carotid atheromatous plaques: a pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29: 1039–1045.
21. Kawahara I, Morikawa M, Honda M, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium-based contrast agent for atherosclerotic carotid plaque. Surg Neurol 2007; 68: 60–65.
22. Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 234–239.
23. Touze E, Toussaint J-F, Coste J, et al. Reproducibility of high-resolution MRI for the identification and the quantification of carotid atherosclerotic plaque components: consequences for prognosis studies and therapeutic trials. Stroke 2007; 38: 1812–1819.
24. Nightingale K, Bentley R, Trahey GE. Observations of tissue response to acoustic radiation force: opportunities for imaging. Ultrason Imaging 2002; 24: 129–138.
25. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 227–235.
26. Nightingale KR, Nightingale RW, Palmeri ML, Trahey GE. A finite element model of remote palpation of breast lesions using radiation force: factors affecting tissue displacement. Ultrason Imaging 2000; 22: 35–54.
27. Nightingale KR, Nightingale RW, Stutz DL, Trahey GE. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of in vivo vastus medialis muscle under varying isometric load. Ultrason Imaging 2002; 24: 100–108.
28. Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, Trahey GE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 625–634.
29. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Technical report. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1997.
30. Dahl JJ, Pinton GF, Palmeri ML, Agrawal V, Nightingale KR, Trahey GE. A parallel tracking method for acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007; 54: 301–312.
31. Chu KC, Rutt BK. Polyvinyl alcohol cryogel: an ideal phantom material for MR studies of arterial flow and elasticity. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 314–319.
32. Fromageau J, Brusseau E, Vray D, Gimenez G, Delachartre P. Characterization of PVA cryogel for intravascular ultrasound elasticity imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2003; 50: 1318–1324.
33. Fromageau J, Gennisson JL, Schmitt C, Maurice RL, Mongrain R, Cloutier G. Estimation of polyvinyl alcohol cryogel mechanical properties with four ultrasound elastography methods and comparison with gold standard testings. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007; 54: 498–509.
34. Nadkarni SK, Austin H, Mills G, Boughner D, Fenster A. A pulsating coronary vessel phantom for two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 621–628.
35. Dumont D, Dahl J, Miller E, Allen J, Fahey B, Trahey G. Lower-limb vascular imaging with acoustic radiation force elastography: demonstration of in vivo feasibility. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009; 56: 931–944.
36. Trahey GE, Palmeri ML, Bentley RC, Nightingale KR. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the mechanical properties of arteries: in vivo and ex vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1163–1171.
37. Gerhard-Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, Mohler E, Roman M, Naqvi TZ. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology. Vasc Med 2006; 11: 183–200.
38. Baldewsing RA, de Korte CL, Schaar JA, Mastik F, van der Steen AFW. A finite element model for performing intravascular ultrasound elastography of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 803–813.
39. Cheng GC, Loree HM, Kamm RD, Fishbein MC, Lee RT. Distribution of circumferential stress in ruptured and stable atherosclerotic lesions. A structural analysis with histopathological correlation. Circulation 1994; 87: 1179–1187.
40. Keeny SM, Richardson PD. Stress analysis of atherosclerotic arteries. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ninth Annual Conference, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, p.1987, 1484–1485.
41. Lee RT, Loree HM, Fishbein MC. High stress regions in saphenous vein bypass graft atherosclerotic lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1639–1644.
42. Dahl JJ, Dumont DM, Allen JD, Miller EM, Trahey GE. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for noninvasive characterization of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 707–716.
43. Palmeri ML, McAleavey SA, Trahey GE, Nightingale KR. Ultrasonic tracking of acoustic radiation force-induced displacements in homogeneous media. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 1300–1313.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 29, 2011
Issue published: August 2011
Keywords
PubMed: 21447606
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 234
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 41 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 43
- Ultrasound Viscoelastography by Acoustic Radiation Force: A State-of-the-Art Review
- Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantoms With Heterogeneous Plaques: Estimation of Pulse Wave Velocity at the Stenotic Region Using Pulse Wave Imaging
- Probability Mass Function-Based Adaptive Median Filtering for Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging: A Feasibility Study
- Mechanical and histological characteristics of aortic dissection tissues
- Intravascular polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography based on polarization mode delay
- 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)
- Improved Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging Using Split-Focused Ultrasound Transducer With Phase Inversion Technique
- Medical prevention and treatment of radiation-induced carotid injury
- 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)
- Delineation of Human Carotid Plaque Features <italic>In Vivo</italic> by Exploiting Displacement Variance
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBAccess options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
SVM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SVM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
