Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 31, 2023

Promoting prosociality toward future generations in antibiotic intake

Abstract

Understanding individuals’ preferences for antibiotics can help mitigate the acceleration of antibiotic resistance. Similar to the climate crisis, individuals “today” need to appropriately use antibiotics to reduce the negative consequences of antibiotic resistance for individuals “tomorrow.” We use an established—yet novel in this research field—behavioral game approach to investigate individuals’ preferences for antibiotics in the face of a between-generations conflict. In an online study, we investigated whether a between-generations (vs within-generations) conflict in antibiotic intake leads to larger overuse and how to promote appropriate use of antibiotics. Results indicate that overuse in the face of a between-generations (vs within-generations) conflict increased. Eliciting empathy toward future generations in the case of a between-generations conflict decreased overuse. Findings suggest that different representations of this social dilemma can influence people’s preferences for antibiotics, and that empathy-based interventions might promote appropriate antibiotic use.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Data availability statement

The current article is accompanied by the relevant raw data generated during and/or analysed during the study, including files detailing the analyses and either the complete database or other relevant raw data. These files are available in the Figshare repository and accessible as Supplemental Material via the Sage Journals platform. Ethics approval, participant permissions, and all other relevant approvals were granted for this data sharing. The data files from the current study are also available in the OSF repository at https://osf.io/tmxbn/?view_only=8e011ae6e5984d98916aab45e368e7e

References

Ancillotti M, Eriksson S, Andersson DI, et al. (2020) Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 56(6): 106198.
Ancillotti M, Eriksson S, Veldwijk J, et al. (2018) Public awareness and individual responsibility needed for judicious use of antibiotics: A qualitative study of public beliefs and perceptions 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services. BMC Public Health 18(1): 1–9.
Ashton MC, Lee K (2009) The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment 91(4): 340–345.
Bates D, Maechler M, Walker S (2021). Package “lme4.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf (accessed 14 December 2022).
Böhm R, Betsch C (2022) Prosocial vaccination. Current Opinion in Psychology 43: 307–311.
Böhm R, Betsch C, Korn L (2016) Selfish-rational non-vaccination: Experimental evidence from an interactive vaccination game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 131(B): 183–195.
Böhm R, Holtmann-Klenner C, Korn L, et al. (2022) Behavioral determinants of antibiotic resistance: The role of social information. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being 14: 757–775.
Brown K, Adger WN, Devine-Wright P, et al. (2019) Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability. Global Environmental Change 56: 11–17.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html (accessed 14 December 2022).
Chaintarli K, Ingle SM, Bhattacharya A, et al. (2016) Impact of a United Kingdom-wide campaign to tackle antimicrobial resistance on self-reported knowledge and behaviour change. BMC Public Health 16(1): 1–9.
Chapman GB, Li M, Vietri J, et al. (2012) Using game theory to examine incentives in influenza vaccination behavior. Psychological Science 23(9): 1008–1015.
Dawes RM (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Reviews 31(1): 169–193.
Diamant M, Baruch S, Kassem E, et al. (2021) A game theoretic approach reveals that discretizing clinical information can reduce antibiotic misuse. Nature Communications 12(1): 1148.
Erdfelder E, FAul F, Buchner A, et al. (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41(4): 1149–1160.
Freedman G, Flanagan M (2017) From dictators to avatars: Furthering social and personality psychology through game methods. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11(12): 1–20.
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.
Harring N, Krockow EM (2021) The social dilemmas of climate change and antibiotic resistance: An analytic comparison and discussion of policy implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8(1): 1–9.
Hauser DJ, Ellsworth PC, Gonzalez R (2018) Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–10.
Hollis A, Maybarduk P (2015) Antibiotic resistance is a tragedy of the commons that necessitates global cooperation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43(S3): 33–37.
Ibuka Y, Li M, Vietri J, et al. (2014) Free-riding behavior in vaccination decisions: An experimental study. PLoS One 9(1): 1–9.
Jacquet J, Hagel K, Hauert C, et al. (2013) Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game. Nature Climate Change 3(12): 1025–1028.
Kianmehr H, Sabounchi NS, Seyedzadeh Sabounchi S, et al. (2019) Patient expectation trends on receiving antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice 73(7): e13360.
Kohut MR, Keller SC, Linder JA, et al. (2020) The inconvincible patient: How clinicians perceive demand for antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Family practice 37(2): 276–282.
Kotwani A, Wattal C, Katewa S, et al. (2010) Factors influencing primary care physicians to prescribe antibiotics in Delhi India. Family Practice 27(6): 684–690.
Krockow EM, Tarrant C, Colman AM (2021) Prosociality in the social dilemma of antibiotic prescribing. Current Opinion in Psychology 44: 164–169.
Laxminarayan R, Heymann DL (2012) Challenges of drug resistance in the developing world. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 344: e1567.
Murnighan JK, Wang L (2016) The social world as an experimental game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 136: 80–94.
Murphy L, Dockray S (2018) The consideration of future consequences and health behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review 12(4): 357–381.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Antimicrobial stewardship. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs121/chapter/Quality-statement-1-Advice-on-self-limiting-conditions (accessed 14 December 2022).
O’Neill J (2016) Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. Archives of Pharmacy Practice 7(3): 110–111.
Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 137–158.
Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac: A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 17: 22–27.
Pfattheicher S, Petersen MB, Böhm R (2022). Information about herd immunity through vaccination and empathy promote COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Health Psychology 41(2): 85–93.
Qualtrics [Computer software] (2020) Make every interaction an experience that matters. Available at: http://www.qualtrics.com (accessed 14 December 2022).
Roope LSJ, Smith RD, Pouwels KB, et al. (2019) The challenge of antimicrobial resistance: What economics can contribute. Science 364(6435): eaau4679.
Scaioli G, Gualano MR, Gili R, et al. (2015) Antibiotic use: A cross-sectional survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices amongst students of a school of medicine in Italy. PLoS One 10(4): 1–12.
Shahen ME, Masaya W, Kotani K, et al. (2020) Motivational factors in intergenerational sustainability dilemma: A post-interview analysis. Sustainability 12: 7078.
Shen F, Sheer VC, Li R (2015) Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising 44(2): 105–113.
Sirota M, Round T, Samaranayaka S, et al. (2017) Expectations for antibiotics increase their prescribing: Causal evidence about localized impact. Health Psychology 36(4): 402–409.
Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, et al. (1994) The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 742–752.
Sun BZ, Chaitoff A, Hu B, et al. (2017) Empathy, burnout, and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: A cross-sectional primary care study in the US. The British Journal of General Practice 67(661): e565–e571.
Tarrant C, Krockow EM, Nakkawita WMID, et al. (2020) Moral and contextual dimensions of “inappropriate” antibiotic prescribing in secondary care: A three-country interview study. Frontiers in Sociology 5: 1–9.
Teixeira Rodrigues A, Roque F, Falcão A, et al. (2013) Understanding physician antibiotic prescribing behaviour: A systematic review of qualitative studies. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 41(3): 203–212.
Thielmann I, Böhm R, Ott M, et al. (2021) Economic games: An introduction and guide for research. Collabra: Psychology 7(1): 19004.
Thorpe A, Sirota M, Juanchich M, et al. (2020) Action bias in the public’s clinically inappropriate expectations for antibiotics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 26(3): 422–431.
Thorpe A, Sirota M, Orbell S, et al. (2021) Effect of information on reducing inappropriate expectations and requests for antibiotics. British Journal of Psychology 112(3): 804–827.
Van Beek J, Antonides G, Handgraaf MJJ (2013) Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 54(6): 785–791.
Van Dijk E, De Dreu CKW (2021) Experimental games and social decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 72: 415–438.
Vandeweerdt C, Luong T, Atchapero M, et al. (2022) Virtual reality reduces COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the wild: A randomized trial. Scientific Reports 12(1): 1–7.
Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, et al. (2019) Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Science 14(1): 1–15.
World Health Organization (2021) The TAP Quick Guide: A Practical Handbook for Implementing Tailoring Antimicrobial Resistance Programmes. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 31, 2023
Issue published: September 2023

Keywords

  1. antibiotics
  2. decision-making
  3. health behavior
  4. health psychology
  5. prosociality

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Data availability statement

Data is available for this article. View more information
PubMed: 36721947

Authors

Affiliations

Ana Paula Santana
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Lars Korn
Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany
Cornelia Betsch
Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany
Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
Robert Böhm
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria

Notes

Ana Paula Santana, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, Copenhagen K 1253, Denmark. Email: [email protected]

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conceptualization, investigation, and methodology. APS was also responsible for data collection, formal analysis, and writing the original draft.
CB and RB also contributed with funding acquisition. All authors revised, edited, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Health Psychology.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 414

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text