Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 30, 2015

The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test

Abstract

An important gap in the field of second language vocabulary assessment concerns the lack of validated tests measuring aural vocabulary knowledge. The primary purpose of this study is to introduce and provide preliminary validity evidence for the Listening Vocabulary Levels Test (LVLT), which has been designed as a diagnostic tool to measure knowledge of the first five 1000-word frequency levels and the Academic Word List (AWL). Quantitative analyses based on the Rasch model utilized several aspects of Messick’s validation framework. The findings indicated that (1) the items showed sufficient spread of difficulty, (2) the majority of the items displayed good fit to the Rasch model, (3) items and persons generally performed as predicted by a priori hypotheses, (4) the LVLT correlated with Parts 1 and 2 of the TOEIC listening test at .54, (5) the items displayed a high degree of unidimensionality, (6) the items showed a strong degree of measurement invariance with disattenuated Pearson correlations of .97 and .98 for person measures estimated with different sets of items, and (7) carelessness and guessing exerted only minor influences on test scores. Follow-up interviews and qualitative analyses indicated that the LVLT measures the intended construct of aural vocabulary knowledge, the format is easily understood, and the test has high face validity. This test fills an important gap in the field of second language vocabulary assessment by providing teachers and researchers with a way to assess aural vocabulary knowledge.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Beglar D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 27, 101–118.
Bertram R., Baayen R., Schreuder R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390–405.
Bertram R., Laine M., Virkkala M. (2000). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–296.
Borsboom D., Mellenbaugh G.J., van Heerden J. (2004). The concept of a validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.
Buck G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coxhead A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
Dang T.N.Y., Webb S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66–76.
Davies A., Brown A., Elder C., Hill K., Lumley T., McNamara T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fountain R.L., Nation I.S.P. (2000). A vocabulary-based graded dictation test. RELC Journal, 31, 29–44.
Fulcher G., Davidson F. (2007). Language testing and assessment. New York: Routledge.
Henning G. (1991). A study of the effects of contextualization and familiarization on responses to the TOEFL vocabulary test items. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Linacre J.M. (2013). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago, IL: winsteps.com.
McLean S., Kramer B. (2014). Comparing aural and written receptive lexical knowledge. Manuscript in progress.
McLean S., Hogg N., Kramer B. (2014). Estimations of Japanese university learners’ English vocabulary sizes using the vocabulary size test. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 47–55.
McNamara T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Meara P.M. (2005). X_Lex: The Swansea Vocabulary Levels Test (Version 2.05) [computer software and instruction manual]. Swansea: Lognostics. Retrieved from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools (December 2014).
Medical Outcomes Trust Scientific Advisory Committee. (1995). Instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin, 3, 1–4.
Messick S. (1989). Validity. In: Linn R.L. (Ed.), Educational measurement. 3rd edition (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
Messick S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
Milton J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Milton J., Hopkins N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 127–147.
Milton J., Wade J., Hopkins N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In: Chacón-Beltrán R., Abello-Contesse C., Torreblanca-López M., López-Jiménez M.D. (Eds.), Further insights into nonnative vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nagy W.E., Anderson R., Schommer M., Scott J.A., Stallman A. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 263–282.
Nation I.S.P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.
Nation I.S.P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists (17 September 2012). Unpublished paper. Available at: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation (December 2014).
Nation I.S.P., Beglar D. (2007). A Vocabulary Size Test. The Language Teacher, 31, 9–13.
Rasch G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institute.
Read J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rost M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Schmitt N. (1999). The relationship between TOEFL vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation, and word-class knowledge. Language Testing, 16, 189–216.
Schmitt N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Press.
Schmitt N., Schmitt D., Clapham C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.
Stæhr L. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607.
Stevens J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thorndike E.L., Lorge I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
van Zeeland H, Schmitt N. (2012). Lexical coverage and L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34, 457–479.
Webb S., Sasao Y. (2013). New directions in vocabulary testing. RELC Journal, 44, 263–277.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 30, 2015
Issue published: November 2015

Keywords

  1. Item invariance
  2. listening vocabulary
  3. Rasch model
  4. test validity
  5. unidimensionality
  6. vocabulary test

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Stuart McLean
Brandon Kramer
Momoyama Gakuin University, Japan
David Beglar
Temple University, Japan Campus, Japan

Notes

Stuart McLean, Faculty of Foreign Language Studies/Graduate School of Foreign Language Education and Research, Kansai University, 3-3-35, Yamate-cho, Suita, 564-8680 Osaka, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Language Teaching Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2589

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 84 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 84

  1. Exploring Links Between Aural Lexical Knowledge and L2 ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Development and Initial Validation of O-WSVLT, a Meaning-Recall On...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluating the roles of breadth and depth of aural vocabulary knowledg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The development of a Chinese vocabulary proficiency test (CVPT) for le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Assessing English language learners’ collocation knowledge: a systemat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Collecting language assessment data in the age of pandemic: a prelimin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Variations in Vocabulary Depth Among Second Language Learners with Com...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Lexical coverage in dialogue listening
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Individual differences in L2 listening proficiency revisited: Roles of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Lexical Demands of Academic Written English: From Students’ Assignment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Can Japanese learners of English comprehend inflectional and derivatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Using structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. 3K-LEx-MC
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Receptive vocabulary size estimates for general and academic vocabular...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. An exploratory study of young EFL learners’ aural and written receptiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. The role of spoken vocabulary knowledge in second language speaking pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and Chinese...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Increasing use of multi-word expressions in conversation through a flu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Listening strategies in the English Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Aural single‐word and aural phrasal verb knowledge and their relations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Exploring aural vocabulary knowledge for TOEIC as a language exit requ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The auditory picture vocabulary test for English L2: A spoken receptiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Vocabulary Demands of Academic Spoken English Revisited: A Case of Uni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Investigating the Effects of Extensive Listening on Non-English Majors...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. How does repetition affect vocabulary learning through listening to th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Longitudinal measurement of growth in vocabulary size using Rasch-base...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Contribution of English aural vocabulary size levels to L2 listening c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Research Methods in Vocabulary Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Effects Of Field Independence, Metacognitive Knowledge, And Vocabulary...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Incidental vocabulary acquisition from listening to English teacher ed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Issues in matching learners to their reading levels using receptive vo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Bridging local needs and national standards: Use of standards-based in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Person factors and strategic processing in L2 listening comprehension:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. What Predicts Academic Achievement in EMI Courses? Focus on Vocabulary...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Individual Differences in Second Language Listening: Examining the Rol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. The relationship between two measures of L2 phonological vocabulary kn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Acquisition of Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge by Secondary ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Lexical Profile of Newspapers Revisited: A Corpus-Based Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Vocabulary Demands of Informal Spoken English Revisited: What Does It ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Exploring the relationship between aural decoding and listening compre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Test Format and Local Dependence of Items Revisited: A Case of Two Voc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Vocabulary Demands of the IELTS Listening Test: An In-Depth Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. The Technology of the Learning Outcomes Test Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. A Rasch-based validation of the Vietnamese version of the Listening Vo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF LISTENING AND READING VOCABULARIES TO LISTENING C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Vocabulary Learning Autonomy and Vocabulary Size of Turkish ELT Studen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Effect‐Driven Sample Sizes in Second Language Instructed Vocabulary Ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Memory Strategies for Vocabulary Learning Employed by Saudi Undergradu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. High school to university transitional challenges in English medium in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Learning Vocabulary Through Listening: The Role of Vocabulary Knowledg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Vocabulary learning through listening: Comparing L2 explanations, teac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Loanword proportion in vocabulary size tests
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Vocabulary in Language Teaching
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Examining Second Language Listening, Vocabulary, and Executive Functio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. THE RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF SYNTACTIC KNOWLEDGE AND VOCABULARY KNOWLE...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. The role of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in second langua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Analyzing Discourse in EMI Courses from an ELF Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. EFFECTS OF NARROW READING AND LISTENING ON L2 VOCABULARY LEARNING
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Using a Listening Vocabulary Levels Test to Explore the Effect of Voca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Developing a new academic vocabulary test
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Vocabulary Size Tests of Different Modality and Their Relationships wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. WOR-TE: Ein Ja / Nein-Wortschatztest für Kinder verschiedene...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Effects of Removing Responses With Likely Random Guessing Under Rasch ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Roles of Vocabulary Knowledge for Success in English‐Medium Instructio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Loanword proportion in vocabulary size tests
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. The updated Vocabulary Levels Test
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Help options for L2 listening in CALL: A research agenda
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. A Response to Holster and Lake Regarding Guessing and the Rasch Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Christopher Brumfit Thesis Award Winner 2014 – Hilde van Zeeland: Four...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Word Families and Frequency Bands in Vocabulary Tests: Challenging Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Interpreting Vocabulary Test Scores: What Do Various Item Formats Tell...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Loanwords and Vocabulary Size Test Scores: A Case of Different Estimat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Guessing and the Rasch Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text