Demobilising by legitimising: Masculine honour, positive and negative contact, and social activism against criminal organisations
Abstract
Italian mafia-type groups exert governance over the community. To do so, they must engage in contact with community members. Previous research indicates that individuals’ endorsement of masculine honour values is associated with more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations (COs). The present research examines the relationship between masculine honour and both positive and negative contact, as well as the potential implications of such contact. Structural equation modelling of survey data (N = 327) revealed that masculine honour was associated with positive but not negative contact with COs’ members. Positive contact was, in turn, associated with a stronger tendency to see COs as matching the ideals of honour (romanticisation), and lower perceived threat. In contrast, negative contact was associated with stronger perceived threat from COs’ presence. Finally, romanticisation and lower perceived threat were associated with lower intentions to engage in social activism against COs. Results support the idea that cultural values of masculine honour make the presence of COs in society more acceptable and are an important predictor of contact with this type of group.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aberson C. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760.
Aberson C. L. (2019). Indirect effects of threat on the contact–prejudice relationship: A meta-analysis. Social Psychology, 50, 105–126.
Allport G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Banfield E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York, NY: Free Press.
Barlow F. K., Paolini S., Pedersen A., Hornsey M. J., Radke H. R. M., Harwood J.,. . .Sibley C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643.
Barnes C. D., Brown R. P., Lenes J., Bosson J., Carvallo M. (2014). My country, my self: Honor, identity, and defensive responses to national threats. Self and Identity, 13, 638–662.
Barnes C. D., Brown R. P., Osterman L. L. (2012). Don’t tread on me: Masculine honor ideology in the U.S. and militant responses to terrorism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1018–1029.
Boccato G., Capozza D., Trifiletti E., Di Bernardo G. A. (2015). Attachment security and intergroup contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 629–647.
Cakal H., Hewstone M., Schwär G., Heath A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–627.
Cohen D., Nisbett R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551–567.
Cohen D., Nisbett R. E. (1997). Field experiments examining the culture of honor: The role of institutions in perpetuating norms about violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1188–1199.
Cohen D., Nisbett R. E., Bowdle B. F., Schwarz N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–959.
Correa-Cabrera G., Keck M., Nava J. (2015). Losing the monopoly of violence: The state, a drug war and the paramilitarization of organized crime in Mexico (2007–10). State Crime Journal, 4, 77–95.
Dhont K., Cornelis I., van Hiel A. (2010). Interracial public–police contact: Relationships with police officers’ racial and work-related attitudes and behavior. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 551–560.
Dhont K., van Hiel A. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177.
Dixon J., Levine M., Reicher S., Durrheim K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425.
Drury L., Abrams D., Swift H. J., Lamont R. A., Gerocova K. (2017). Can caring create prejudice? An investigation of positive and negative intergenerational contact in care settings and the generalisation of blatant and subtle age prejudice to other older people. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 65–82.
Emler N., Reicher S. D. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Enders C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Fiske A. P., Rai T. S. (2014). Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Graf S., Paolini S. (2017). Investigating positive and negative intergroup contact. In Vezzali S., Stathi S. (Eds.), Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 92–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
Graf S., Paolini S., Rubin M. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547.
Harinck F., Shafa S., Ellemers N., Beersma B. (2013). The good news about honor culture: The preference for cooperative conflict management in the absence of insults. Negotiation and Management Research, 6, 67–78.
Hodson G., Dhont K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42.
Jackson J. W., Poulsen J. R. (2005). Contact experiences mediate the relationship between five-factor model personality traits and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 667–685.
Kanas A., Scheepers P., Sterkens C. (2017). Positive and negative contact and attitudes towards the religious out-group: Testing the contact hypothesis in conflict and non-conflict regions of Indonesia and the Philippines. Social Science Research, 63, 95–110.
Levin S., Roccas S., Sidanius J., Pratto F. (2015). Personal values and intergroup outcomes of concern for group honor. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 374–384.
Little T. D., Cunningham W. A., Shahar G., Widaman K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173.
Mähönen T. A., Jasinskaja-Lahti I. (2016). Ramifications of positive and negative contact experiences among remigrants from Russia to Finland. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 247–255.
McCrae R. R., Costa P. T. Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In Pervin L. A., John O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Moon C., Travaglino G. A., Uskul A. K. (2018). Social value orientation and endorsement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: An exploratory study comparing individuals from North America and South Korea. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
Oyserman D., Coon H. M., Kemmelmeier M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
Paoli L. (2003). Mafia brotherhoods: Organized crime, Italian style. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Paolini S., Harwood J., Rubin M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738.
Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pitt-Rivers J. (1966). Honour and social status. In Peristiany J. (Ed.), Honour and shame: The values of Mediterranean society (pp. 19–77). London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Reimer N. K., Becker J. C., Benz A., Christ O., Dhont K., Klocke U.,. . .Hewstone M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136.
Roberti F. (2008). Organized crime in Italy: The Neapolitan Camorra today. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2, 43–49.
Rodriguez Mosquera P. M. (2016). On the importance of family, morality, masculine, and feminine honor for theory and research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 431–442.
Rosseel Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
Schneider J. C., Schneider P. T. (2003). Reversible destiny: Mafia, antimafia, and the struggle for Palermo. California: University of California Press.
Selvanathan H. P., Techakesari P., Tropp L. R., Barlow F. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 893–912.
Sengupta N. K., Sibley C. G. (2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1391–1403.
Shafa S., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Beersma B. (2015). Regulating honor in the face of insults. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 158–174.
Skaperdas S., Syropoulos C. (1995). Gangs as primitive states. In Fiorentini G., Peltzman S. (Eds.), The economics of organised crime (pp. 61–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stephan W. S., Stephan C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tausch N., Saguy T., Bryson J. (2015). The implications of intergroup contact for social change: Its impact on individual mobility and collective action intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 536–553.
Toros H., Mavelli L. (2013). Terrorism, organised crime and the biopolitics of violence. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6, 73–91.
Travaglino G. A., Abrams D. (2019). How criminal organisations exert secret power over communities: An intracultural appropriation theory of cultural values and norms. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 74–122.
Travaglino G. A., Abrams D., Randsley de, Moura G. (2014). Men of honor don’t talk: The relationship between masculine honor and social activism against criminal organizations in Italy. Political Psychology, 37, 183–199.
Travaglino G. A., Abrams D., Randsley de, Moura G., Russo G. (2015). That is how we do it around here: Levels of identification, masculine honor, and social activism against organized crime in the south of Italy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 342–348.
Travaglino G. A., Abrams D., Russo G. (2017). Dual routes from social identity to collective opposition to criminal organisations: Intracultural appropriation theory and the roles of honour codes and social change beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 317–332.
Travaglino G. A., Drury L. (2018). Connected guys: Endorsement of masculine honour predicts more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication.
Triandis H. C. (2001). Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924.
Tropp L. R., Hawi D., van Laar C., Levin S. (2012). Cross-ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 257–272.
Turner R. N., Dhont K., Hewstone M., Prestwich A., Vonofakou C. (2014). The role of personality factors in the reduction of intergroup anxiety and amelioration of outgroup attitudes via intergroup contact. European Journal of Personality, 28, 180–192.
Tyler T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Uskul A. K., Cross S. E., Gunsoy C., Gul P. (2019). Cultures of honor. In Kitayama S., Cohen D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 793–821). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Van Assche J., Roets A., Dhont K., van Hiel A. (2016). The association between actual and perceived ethnic diversity: The moderating role of authoritarianism and implications for outgroup threat, anxiety, and mistrust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 807–817.
Vandello J. A., Cohen D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997–1010.
Vezzali L., Turner R., Capozza D., Trifiletti E. (2018). Does intergroup contact affect personality? A longitudinal study on the bidirectional relationship between intergroup contact and personality traits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 159–173.
Von Lampe K. (2016). Organized crime: Analyzing illegal activities, criminal structures, and extra-legal governance. London, UK: SAGE.
Weber M. (1919). Politik Aals Beruf [Politics as a vocation]. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
Weber M. (1978). Economy and society (Roth G., Wittich C., Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wölfer R., Jaspers E., Blaylock D., Wigoder C., Hughes J., Hewstone M. (2017). Studying positive and negative direct and extended contact: Complementing self-reports with social network analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1566–1581.
Yuki M., Brewer M. B. (Eds.). (2014). Culture and group processes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 29, 2019
Issue published: April 2020
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 484
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 7 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 8
- National identification weakens, and territorial identification strengthens, the relationship between masculine honor values and the justification of practices of connivance with the mafia
- Reclaim the streets: The link between positive and negative direct intergroup contact and movement support against immigration via threat perceptions
- The role of honour in interpersonal, intrapersonal and intergroup processes
- Positive Contact with Feminist Women as a Predictor of Feminist Solidarity, Gender Privilege Awareness, and Public and Domestic Support for Gender Equality in Straight Men
- Intergroup contact and social change: An integrated Contact‐Collective Action Model
- “If they don’t listen to us, they deserve it”: The effect of external efficacy and anger on the perceived legitimacy of hacking
- The Secret Power of Criminal Organizations
- The Secret Power of Criminal Organizations
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
