Perceived group discrimination based on one’s gender and the gender gap in depression in Europe
Abstract
Background:
Gender discrimination is one of the most significant psychosocial stressors. This study examined whether the relationship between perceived group discrimination against one’s gender (PGD) and the gender gap depression varied by societal levels of gender inequality.
Methods:
The current study used data from three waves (2006, 2012 and 2014) of the European Social Survey and applied multilevel linear regression methods. We assessed depressive feelings through the eight-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. The sample contained 71,419 respondents living in 22 countries.
Results:
While only a small percentage of people were confronted with PGD, this group consistently reported more depressive feelings. PGD had a similar effect on the mental health of men and women, except for men in more gender-egalitarian societies. When confronted with PGD, the latter group reported more depressive feelings in comparison to men in more gender unequal societies.
Conclusions:
Our research found a strong association between PGD and depression. In addition, this relationship varied by societal levels of gender equality. More pronounced gender equality strengthened this relationship in men. Research that ignores this social context might, therefore, be limited in terms of generalization.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Williams DR. The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. J Health Soc Behav 1999:208–30.
2. Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 2009;135:531–54.
3. Schmitt MT, Branscombe NR, Postmes T, et al. The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 2014;140:921–48.
4. Gee G, Walsemann K. Does health predict the reporting of racial discrimination or do reports of discrimination predict health? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:1676–84.
5. Van de Velde S, Bracke P, Levecque K. Gender differences in depression in 23 European countries. Cross-national variation in the gender gap in depression. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:305–13.
6. Van de Velde S, Bracke P, Levecque K, et al. Gender differences in depression in 25 European countries after eliminating measurement bias in the CES-D 8. Soc Sci Res 2010;39:396–404.
7. Bourguignon D, Seron E, Yzerbyt V, et al. Perceived group and personal discrimination: differential effects on personal self-esteem. Eur J Soc Psychol 2006;36:773–89.
8. Stevens GW, Thijs J. Perceived group discrimination and psychological well-being in ethnic minority adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol 2018;48:559–70.
9. Manzi F. Are the processes underlying discrimination the same for women and men? A critical review of congruity models of gender discrimination. Front Psychol 2019;10:469.
10. Kübler D, Schmid J, Stüber R. Gender discrimination in hiring across occupations: a nationally-representative vignette study. Labour Econ 2018;55:215–29.
11. Arpino B, Esping-Andersen G, Pessin L. How do changes in gender role attitudes towards female employment influence fertility? A macro-level analysis. Eur Soc Rev 2015;31:370–82.
12. Fraser N. After the family wage: gender equity and the welfare state. Polit Theor 1994;22:591–618.
13. Schmitt MT, Branscombe NR, Kobrynowicz D, et al. Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002;28:197–210.
14. Harding T. The construction of men who are nurses as gay. J Adv Nurs 2007;60:636–44.
15. Pew Research Center. Gender discrimination comes in many forms for today’s working women, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/14/gender-discrimination-comes-in-many-forms-for-todays-working-women/ (2017, accessed 29 June 2020).
16. Coston BM, Kimmel M. White men as the new victims: reverse discrimination cases and the Men’s Rights Movement. Nev LJ. 2012;13:368.
17. Swim JK, Hyers LL, Cohen LL, et al. Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. J Soc Issues 2001;57:31–53.
18. Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: the self-protective properties of stigma. Psychol Rev 1989;96:608–30.
19. Crocker J, Quinn DM. Social stigma and the self: meanings, situations, and self-esteem. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, et al. (eds) The social psychology of stigma. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2000, pp. 153–83.
20. Kobrynowicz D, Branscombe NR. Who considers themselves victims of discrimination?: Individual difference predictors of perceived gender discrimination in women and men. Psychol Women Q 1997;21:347–63.
21. Leaper C, Brown CS. Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. Child Dev 2008;79:685–704.
22. Van de Velde S, Huijts T, Bambra C, et al. Macro-level gender equality and depression in men and women in Europe. Sociol Health Illn 2013;35:682–98.
23. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401.
24. Alvarez-Galvez J, Salvador-Carulla L. Perceived discrimination and self-rated health in Europe: evidence from the European Social Survey (2010). PLoS One 2013;8:e74252.
25. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Package ‘lme4’. J Stat Softw 2014;67:12.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. What are equivalence scales?, http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf (2005, accessed 29 June 2020).
27. Kehn A, Ruthig JC. Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: the moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles 2013;69:289–96.
28. Clark A, Knabe A, Rätzel S. Boon or bane? Others’ unemployment, well-being and job insecurity. Labour Econ 2010;17:52–61.
29. Van de Velde S, Van der Bracht K, Buffel V. The relation between religion and depression in Europe: the moderating role of the religious context. Int J Comp Sociol 2017;58:515–32.
30. Barkan SE. Measuring perceived mistreatment: potential problems in asking about ‘discrimination’. Sociol Inq 2018;88:245–53.
31. Eurobarometer. Special Eurobarometer 437: discrimination in the EU in 2015, https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2077_83_4_437_ENG (2015, accessed 29 June 2020).
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: November 6, 2020
Issue published: August 2021
Keywords
PubMed: 33158405
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 378
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 2 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 1
- Cultural collectivism, intimate partner violence, and women's mental h...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
DSFF and FHF members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
DSFF and FHF members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
