Abstract
The prevailing discourse of quality in early childhood education in Australia and internationally supports the idea that everyone, from families to educators, policymakers, researchers and politicians, wants high-quality early childhood education programs for all young children. This dominance is so pervasive that it becomes difficult to think about quality in any other terms, putting limitations on ‘what it is possible to think’ when it comes to quality early childhood education. In an attempt to suspend the habitual and contested assumptions associated with the mission for quality, this article aims to move beyond what these discourses make it possible to think and imagine by traversing some of the territory as it exists currently in Australia. As part of this, we adopt an exploratory approach where we try and imagine otherwise. We do this by presenting a vignette, a rich description of a child/pipe/sand event, which we work through using the National Quality Standard in Australia and a brief Darwinian encounter. The intention is to use what is familiar (observation, quality measurement) and make the familiar less familiar in order to create niches for variations and alternative imaginings of ‘quality’.
|
Adorno, T, Horkheimer, M (1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso. Google Scholar | |
|
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2013) Guide to the National Quality Standard. Available at: http://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF03-Guide-to-NQS-130902.pdf (accessed 20 August 2014). Google Scholar | |
|
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2015a) National Quality Framework. Available at: http://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework (accessed 20 August 2014). Google Scholar | |
|
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2015b) Quality areas. Available at: http://www.acecqa.gov.au/Quality-Areas#sthash.CGWy1JpI.dpuf (accessed 20 August 2014). Google Scholar | |
|
Clark, A (2007) A hundred ways of listening: Gathering children’s perspectives of their early childhood environment. Young Children 62(3): 76–81. Google Scholar | |
|
Dahlberg, G, Moss, P (2005) Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dahlberg, G, Moss, P, Pence, A (2007) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of Evaluation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Dalli, C, Rockel, J, Duhn, I. (2011) Investigating the ‘what, hows and whys’ of relational pedagogy with infant and toddlers. Summary report to the Teaching and Learning Initiative. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Dionne, E (2014) Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art by Elizabeth Grosz (review). Feminist Formations 26(3): 204–208. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Duhn, I (2015) Making agency matter: Rethinking infant and toddler agency in educational discourse. Discourse 36(6): 920–931. Google Scholar | |
|
Enslin, P, Tjiattas, M (2015) Philosophical approaches to educational research: Justice, democracy, and education. In: Smeyers, P, Bridges, D, Burbules, NC. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 1143–1164. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Geertz, C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Gibson-Graham, JK (2014) Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology 55(9): 147–153. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Grieshaber, S (2002) A national system of child care accreditation: Quality assurance or a technique of normalization? In: Cannella, GS, Anijar, K, Kincheloe, J (eds) Kidworld: Childhood Studies, Global Perspectives and Education. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 161–180. Google Scholar | |
|
Grieshaber, S, McArdle, F (2014) Ethical dimensions and perspectives on play. In: Brooker, L, Edwards, S, Blaise, M (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood. London: SAGE, pp. 103–114. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Grosz, E (2011) Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hamre, BK, Pianta, RC, Burchinal, M. (2012) A course on effective teacher–child interactions: Effects on teacher beliefs, knowledge, and observed practice. American Educational Research Journal 49(1): 88–123. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Haraway, D (2013) SF: Science fiction, speculative fabulation, string figures, so far. Ada: Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology (3). Available at: http://adanewmedia.org/issues/issue-archives/issue3/ Google Scholar | |
|
Harms, T, Clifford, RM, Cryer, D (2015) Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. Third Edition. New York: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hawkins, K (2014) Looking forward, looking back: Framing the future for teaching social justice in early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 39(3): 121–128. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Latour, B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lenz Taguchi, H (2010) Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-active Pedagogy. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Livesey, G (2005) Assemblage. In: Parr, A (ed.) The Deleuze Dictionary. Rev. ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18–19. Google Scholar | |
|
Løkken, G (2009) The construction of ‘toddler’ in early childhood pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 10(1): 35–42. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lorimer, J (2015) Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after Nature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
MacLure, M (2013) The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13(4): 228–232. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Moss, P (2014) Transformative Change and Real Utopias in Early Childhood Education: A Story of Democracy, Experimentation and Potentiality. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Olsson, LM (2009) Movement and Experimentation in Young Children’s Learning: Deleuze and Guattari in Early Childhood Education. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Olsson, LM (2013) Taking children’s questions seriously: The need for creative thought. Global Studies of Childhood 3(3): 230–253. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Ringrose, J, Renold, E (2014) F**k rape! Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry 20(6): 772–780. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tayler, C, Ishimine, K, Cloney, D. (2013) The quality of early childhood education and care services in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 38(2): 13–21. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Thorpe, K, Conley, D, Tayler, C (2010) Rethinking early childhood education and care: Implications for research and evaluation. In: Peterson, P, Baker, E, McGaw, B (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Education. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 144–150. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Unger, RM (2005) What Should the Left Propose? London: Verso. Google Scholar |
Author biographies
Iris Duhn is a Senior Lecturer in early childhood education. Her research focuses on critical and creative analyses of current issues in early childhood, with a particular focus on cultural politics of sustainability.
Sue Grieshaber is Professor, Early Years. Her research is informed by a range of theoretical perspectives that favour equity and social justice and include early childhood curriculum, policy, pedagogy and families.

