![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Implementing relationships-based pedagogies in infant and toddler settings might assume that teachers’ experiences of emotional labour will be acknowledged. This assumption may be complicated by assessment practices that both rely on and detract from relationship-building opportunities with infants and toddlers. Assessment also relies on reciprocal relationships between teachers, and between teachers and families. Drawing on sociocultural theoretical perspectives, this article illustrates how one team of infant-toddler teachers in Aotearoa-New Zealand reframed their assessment understandings and practices to acknowledge their experiences of emotional labour with infants and toddlers. Consequently, positive changes in the teachers’ relationships with children, with families and with each other eventuated. The author argues that reconceptualising relationships in infant-toddler settings requires an understanding of assessment as a reflexive, relational process that can occur during everyday interactions, and emotional labour as central to relationship-building. Implications include teachers’ need for time, reflective dialogue and support to address tensions between assessment and relational pedagogy, so that relationships might be reconceptualised and the importance of emotional labour acknowledged.
Keywords Assessment, emotional labour, infants and toddlers, relationships
References
Section:
|
Andrew, Y (2015) What we feel and what we do: Emotional capital in early childhood work. Early Years 35(4): 351–365. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Blaiklock, KE (2008) A critique of the use of learning stories to assess the learning dispositions of young children. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education 11: 77–87. Google Scholar | |
|
Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Carr, M (2001) Assessment in Early Childhood Settings: Learning Stories. London: Paul Chapman. Google Scholar | |
|
Carr, M, Cowie, B, Mitchell, L (2016) Documentation in early childhood research: Practice and research informing each other. In: Farrell, A, Kagan, SL, Kay, E. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Research. London: SAGE, pp. 277–290. Google Scholar | |
|
Dahlberg, G, Moss, P, Pence, A (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives. London: Falmer Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, B, Degotardi, S (2015) Who cares? Infant educators’ responses to professional discourses of care. Early Child Development and Care 185(11–12): 1733–1747. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Degotardi, S (2015) Mind mindedness: Forms, features and implications for infant-toddler pedagogy. In: Robson, S, Quinn, SF (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Young Children’s Thinking. London: Routledge, pp. 179–188. Google Scholar | |
|
Degotardi, S, Pearson, E (2014) The Relationship Worlds of Infants and Toddlers: Multiple Perspectives from Early Years Theory and Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Education Review Office (2008) The Quality of Assessment in Early Childhood Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media. Google Scholar | |
|
Edwards, C, Raikes, H (2002) Extending the dance: Relationship-based approaches to infant/toddler care and education. Young Children 57(4): 10–17. Google Scholar | |
|
Elfer, P (2012) Emotion in nursery work: Work discussion as a model of critical professional reflection. Early Years 32(2): 129–141. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Elliot, E (2007) We’re Not Robots: The Voices of Daycare Providers. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Grey, A (2015) ‘It is a risk, but it is a risk worth taking’: Early childhood teachers’ reflections on review of practice using an approach of practical philosophy. NZ Research in Early Childhood Education Journal 18: 52–66. Google Scholar | |
|
Hargreaves, A (2000) Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education 16(2): 811–826. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hedges, H, Cooper, M (2014) Inquiring minds, meaningful responses: Children’s interests, inquiries, and working theories: Final summary report. Available at: http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-completed/ece-sector/inquiring-minds-meaningful-responses-children%E2%80%99s (accessed 15 September 2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Hochschild, AR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Karlsdóttir, K, Garðarsdóttir, B (2010) Exploring children’s learning stories as an assessment method for research and practice. Early Years 30(3): 255–266. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Merriam, SB (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (1996) Te Whāriki/He Whāriki Matauranga mō ngā Mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media and Ministry of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (2004) Kei Tua o te Pae Assessment for Learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Books 1–9. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (2007) Kei Tua o te Pae Assessment for Learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Books 10–15. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (2009) Kei Tua o te Pae Assessment for Learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Books 16–20. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (2017) Te Whāriki/He Whāriki Matauranga mō ngā Mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media and Ministry of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Osgood, J (2010) Reconstructing professionalism in ECEC: The case for the ‘critically reflective emotional professional’. Early Years 30(2): 119–133. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Page, J, Elfer, P (2013) The emotional complexity of attachment interactions in nursery. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 21(4): 553–567. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Papatheodorou, T (2009) Exploring relational pedagogy. In: Papatheodorou, T, Moyles, J (eds) Learning Together in the Early Years: Exploring Relational Pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3–17. Google Scholar | |
|
Shin, S (2010) Peeking at the relationship world of infant friends and caregivers. Journal of Early Childhood Research 8(3): 294–302. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
White, EJ (2011) Aesthetics of the beautiful: Ideologic tensions in contemporary assessment. In: White, EJ, Peters, MA (eds) Bakhtinian Pedagogy: Opportunities and Challenges for Research, Policy and Practice in Education across the Globe. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 47–67. Google Scholar | |
|
White, EJ, Mika, C (2013) Coming of age? Infants and toddlers in curriculum. In: Nuttall, J (ed.) Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand’s Early Childhood Curriculum Document in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research, pp. 93–113. Google Scholar | |
|
Williamson, D, Cullen, J, Lepper, C (2006) Checklists to narratives in special education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood 31(2): 20–29. Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang, Q (2016) Do learning stories tell the whole story of children’s learning? A phenomenographic enquiry. Early Years 37(3): 255–267. Google Scholar | Crossref |
