![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Since the 1990s, neo-liberal economics has profoundly altered the nature and delivery of early childhood education and care in both Australia and New Zealand through the creation of childcare markets. Accompanying the rise of the market has been a discourse of childcare as a commodity – a commodity marketed and sold to its consumers (read parents) as a private benefit. The stratifying impact of neo-liberalism in education policy has been argued by numerous scholars of education. Arguably, in both Australia and New Zealand, early childhood education and care is more commodified and subject to the market than any other area of education. Thus, the authors consider whether early childhood education and care has shifted away from being understood as a social good, a site for social cohesion and democratic practice – all of which the authors consider to be implicated in a conceptualisation of belonging appropriate to the project of early childhood education and care. This article considers the impact of neo-liberal policies on early childhood education and care in Australia and New Zealand, especially in relation to understandings and manifestations of ‘belonging’. The authors trace the impact of neo-liberalism in early childhood education and care policy and examine the ways in which the discourse of early childhood education and care provision has changed, both in policy and in how the market makes its appeal to parents as consumers. The authors argue that appeals to narrowly defined, individualised self-interest and advancement threaten understandings of belonging based on social solidarity and interdependence.
Keywords Belonging, childcare, commodification, curriculum, early childhood, neo-liberal
References
Section:
|
Aarons, E (2008) Market versus nature : the social philosophy of Friedrich Hayek. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Adamson, E, Brennan, D (2014) Social investment or private profit? Diverging notions of ‘investment’ in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Childhood 46(1): 47–61. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Antonisch, M (2010) Searching for belonging: An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4(6): 644–659. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Berry, HL, Shipley, M (2009) Longing to belong: Personal social capital and psychological distress in an Australian coastal region. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Google Scholar | |
|
Brennan, D (1998) The Politics of Australian Child Care: Philanthropy to Feminism and Beyond. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Carr, M (2008) Can assessment unlock and open the doors to resourcefulness and agency? In: Swaffild, S (ed.) Unlocking Assessment. London: Routledge, pp. 36–54. Google Scholar | |
|
Clarke, M (2012) The (absent) politics of neo-liberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education 53(3): 297–310. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cook, K, Corr, L, Breitkreuz, R (2017) The framing of Australian childcare policy problems and their solutions. Critical Social Policy 37(1): 42–63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Cox, E (2016) Feminism has failed and needs a radical rethink. The Conversation, 8 March. Available at: https://theconversation.com/feminism-has-failed-and-needs-a-radical-rethink-55441 (accessed 12 July 2016). Google Scholar | |
|
Dahlberg, G, Moss, P, Pence, A (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives. London: Falmer Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relation (DEEWR) (2009) Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT, Australia: DEEWR. Google Scholar | |
|
Flynn, J (1981) Liberal women’s group warns government over child care funding. National Times, 13–19 December, p. 3. Google Scholar | |
|
Fraser, N (2016) Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review 100: 99–117. Google Scholar | |
|
Geys, B, Murdoch, Z (2010) Measuring the ‘bridging’ versus ‘bonding’ nature of social networks: A proposal for integrating existing measures. Sociology 44(3): 523–540. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hamer, J, Loveridge, J (2017) Exploring notions of community in a privately owned early childhood education and care centre in New Zealand. Early Years. Epub ahead of print 31 October 2017. DOI: 10.1080/09575146.2017.1396290. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kelsey, J (1997) The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment? Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press and Bridget Williams Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Kemmis, S, Smith, T (2008) Enabling Praxis: Challenges for Education. Rotterdam: Sense. Google Scholar | |
|
Kemmis, S, Wilkinson, J, Edwards-Groves, C. (2014) Changing Practices, Changing Education. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kernan, M (2010) Space and place as a source of belonging and participation in urban environments: Considering the role of early childhood education and care settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 18(2): 199–213. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kim, H-S (2015) Reclaiming equality in a neo-liberal world. Religious Education 110(5): 480–482. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Logan, H (2017) Tensions in constructions of quality in Australian early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy history. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 25(4): 506–518. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Logan, H, Press, F, Sumsion, J (2016) The shaping of Australian early childhood education and care: What can we learn from a critical juncture? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 41(1): 64–71. Google Scholar | |
|
May, H (2001) Politics in the Playground: The World of Early Childhood in New Zealand. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education . (2016). Early Childhood Education Services. Number of licensed ECE services, by service type, operating structure, ownership and year. Available at: https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/early-childhood-education/services Google Scholar | |
|
Ministry of Education (2017) Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Available at: https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Early-Childhood/ELS-Te-Whariki-Early-Childhood-Curriculum-ENG-Web.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Moss, P (2012) Need markets be the only show in town? In: Lloyd, E, Penn, H (eds) Childcare Markets: Can They Deliver an Equitable Service? Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 191–208. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
OECD (2017) Starting Strong 2017: Key OECD Indicators on Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: Starting Strong, OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264276116-en Google Scholar | |
|
Peers, C, Fleer, M (2014) The theory of ‘belonging’: Defining concepts used within Belonging, Being and Becoming – The Australian Early Years Learning Framework. Educational Philosophy and Theory 46(8): 914–928. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Productivity Commission (2014) Childcare and early learning: Final Report. Available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/childcare#report Google Scholar | |
|
Productivity Commission (2014) Child care and early learning: Draft report. Available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/childcare/draft Google Scholar | |
|
Putnam, RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Quaicoe, L (2005) Theorising immigrant and refugee children’s sense of belonging from the perspectives of Bourdieu and postcolonial theory. In: Australian Association for Research in Education, Parramatta, NSW, Australia. Available at: https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2005/qua05784.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Sandel, M (2009) Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? London: Penguin. Google Scholar | |
|
Schein, R (2009) Belonging through land/scape. Environment and Planning A 41(4): 811–826. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sims, M (2017) Neoliberalism and early childhood. Cogent Education 4(1): 1365411. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Social Welfare Commission (1974) Project Care: Children, Parents, Community. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service. Google Scholar | |
|
Stratford, E (2009) Belonging as a resource: The case of Ralphs Bay, Tasmania, and the local politics of place. Environment and Planning A 41(4): 796–810. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sumsion, J, Wong, S (2011) Interrogating ‘belonging’ in Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 12(1): 28–45. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Thorpe, K, Staton, S, Morgan, R. (2012) Testing the vision: Preschool settings as places for meeting, bonding and bridging. Children and Society 26(4): 328–340. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tronto, J (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Tronto, J (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Tronto, J (2017) There is an alternative: Homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring 1(1): 27–43. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Winter, I. (2000). Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital. Working Paper No.21. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Google Scholar | |
|
Witten, K, McCreanor, T, Kearns, R (2007) The place of schools in parents’ community belonging. New Zealand Geographer 63(2): 141–148. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Woodrow, C, Press, F (2017) The privatization/marketization of ECEC debate: Social versus neo-liberal models. In: Miller, L, Carmen, C, Dalli, C. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Policy. London: SAGE, pp. 537–550. Google Scholar |
