![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This paper discusses the canonization process of George Herbert Mead (1863–1931) in sociology through a recounting of the history of the book Mind, Self, and Society (1934). The relation between Mead and this particular work has no parallel in the history of sociological theory. Although the book was not written by Mead, or even organized under his direction, it has been through it that generations of academics and students have come in contact with Mead’s ideas. There are two main goals behind this exercise in historical reconstruction. First, the study of how Mind, Self, and Society came into existence and acquired classical standing offers an insightful view of the contingency and the complexity of canon formation. It is on this continuous process of reception, through which certain texts and authors acquire classical value, which the second part of the article focuses. It discusses the extent to which the history of the reception of Mead’s ideas would have been very different, and the impact of his ideas for theory building substantially larger, if it had been based, not on a posthumously published transcript, but on his own work.
References
|
Abbott, A (1999) Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Alexander, JC (1989) Sociology and discourse: On the centrality of the classics. In: Structure and meaning, ed. Alexander, JC . New York: Columbia University Press, 8–67. Google Scholar | |
|
Alexander, JC (2008) Iconic consciousness: The material of meaning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 782–794. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Baehr, P, O’Brien, M (1994) Founders, classics and the concept of a canon. Current Sociology 42(1): 1–147. Google Scholar | |
|
Baert, P, Silva, FC (2010) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar | |
|
Barbalet, J (2011) Weber, Passion and Profits: ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism’ in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Becker, HS (1963) Outsiders. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Blumer, H (1937) Social psychology. In: Schmidt, E (ed.) Man and Society. A Substantial Introduction to the Social Sciences. New York: Prentice-Hall, 144–198. Google Scholar | |
|
Blumer, H (1966) Sociological implications of the thought of G.H. Mead. American Journal of Sociology 71: 535–544. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Blumer, H (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Blumer, H (1980) Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 45(3): 409–419. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Camic, C (1995) Three departments in search of a discipline: Localism and interdisciplinary interaction in American sociology, 1890–1940. Social Research 62(4): 1003–1033. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Camic, C (ed.) (1997) Reclaiming the Sociological Classics: The State of the Scholarship. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Camic, C (2008) Classics in what sense? Social Psychology Quarterly 71(4): 324–330. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Connell, RW (1997) Why is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 1511–1557. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cook, GA (1993) George Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Coser, L (1971) Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar | |
|
Coser, L (1981) The uses of classical sociological theory. In: Rhea, B (ed.) The Future of Sociological Classics. London: George Allen & Unwin, 170–194. Google Scholar | |
|
Darnton, R (1982) What is the history of books? Daedalus 111(3): 65–83. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Durkheim, É (1995 [1912]) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, trans. Fields, KE . New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Faris, E (1936) Review of Mind, Self, and Society by G.H. Mead. American Journal of Sociology 41: 909–913. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fine, GA (1993) The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 61–87. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fisher, B, Strauss, A (1978) The Chicago tradition and social change: Thomas, Park and their successors. Symbolic Interaction 1(2): 5–23. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fisher, B, Strauss, A (1979) George Herbert Mead and the Chicago tradition of sociology. Symbolic Interaction 2(1): 9–26 (article in two parts). Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gehlen, A (1988 [1950]) Man: His Nature and Place in the World, trans. McMillan, C, Pillemer, K. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Goffman, E (1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Gosh, P (ed.) (2008) A Historian Reads Max Weber: Essays on the Protestant Ethic. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzVerlag. Google Scholar | |
|
Habermas, J (1985) A philosophico-political profile. New Left Review 151: 76–77. Google Scholar | |
|
Habermas, J (1987 [1981]) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. McCarthy, T . Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar | |
|
Honneth, A, Joas, H (1988) Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
How, AR (2007) The author, the text and the canon. Journal of Classical Sociology 7(1): 5–22. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Jauss, H-R (1970) Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History 2(1): 7–37. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Joas, H (1987) Symbolic interactionism. In Giddens, A, Turner, J (eds) Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 82–115. Google Scholar | |
|
Joas, H (1993) Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Joas, H (1996 [1992]) The Creativity of Action, trans. Gaines, J, Keast, P. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar | |
|
Joas, H, Knobl, W (2010) Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lamont, M (1988) How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida. American Journal of Sociology 93(3): 584–622. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lewis, JD (1981) A social behaviorist interpretation of the Meadian ‘I’. In: Aboulafia, M (ed.) Philosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead. Albany: SUNY Press, 109–135. Google Scholar | |
|
Lewis, JD, Smith, RL (1980) American Sociology and Pragmatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Luhmann, N (1995 [1984]) Social Systems, trans. Bednarz, Baecker, D. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
McPhail, C, Rexroat, C (1979) Mead vs Blumer: The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 44(3): 449–467. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mead, GH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. Morris, C . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Mead, GH (2001) Essays in Social Psychology, ed. and intro. Deegan, MJ . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Google Scholar | |
|
Menand, L (2001) The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Google Scholar | |
|
Merton, RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Mills, CW (1942) The professional ideology of social pathologists. American Journal of Sociology 49(2): 165–180. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mills, CW (1959) The Sociological Imagination. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Morrione, T (2004) Herbert Blumer: A biography. In: Blumer, H , George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct, ed. and intro. Morrione T. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira. Google Scholar | |
|
Morris, CW (1934) Preface. In: Mead, GH , Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. Morris, C . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, v–xxxvi. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morris, CW (1970) The Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy. New York: George Braziller. Google Scholar | |
|
Orbach, H (1983) The genesis of Mind, Self, and Society: Mead’s social psychology and Charles Morris’ presentation of it. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction Annual Meeting, Detroit, 1–2 September. Google Scholar | |
|
Orgel, S (1981) What is a text? Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 26: 3–6. Google Scholar | |
|
Parker, D (1997) Why bother with Durkheim? Teaching sociology in the 1990s. Sociological Review 45(1): 122–146. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Parsons, T (1937) The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
Reed, I, Alexander, JC (2009) Social science as reading and performance: A cultural-sociological understanding of epistemology. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 21–41. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ricoeur, P (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation, ed. and trans. Thompson, JB . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Riesman, D (1993 [1955]) The oral tradition, the written word, and the screen image. In: Abundance for What? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 418–441. Google Scholar | |
|
Ritzer, G (2010) Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Seidman, S (2008) Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Shalin, D (1986) Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review 51(1): 9–29. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sherman, LW (1974) Uses of the masters. The American Sociologist 9(4): 176–181. Google Scholar | |
|
Silva, FC (2008) Mead and Modernity: Science, Selfhood and Democratic Politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Skinner, Q (1969) Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory 8(1): 3–52. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tucker, C (1988) Herbert Blumer: A pilgrimage with pragmatism. Symbolic Interaction 11(1): 99–124. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tugendhat, E (1991) Mead: Symbolic interaction and the self. In: Aboulafia, M (ed.) Philosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead. New York: SUNY Press, 169–200. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, BS (ed.) (2008) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Vieira, MB (2009) The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Waples, D (1931) The Graduate Library School at Chicago. The Library Quarterly 1(1): 26–36. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Webb, RK (1955) The British Working Class Reader, 1790–1848. New York: George Allen & Unwin. Google Scholar | |
|
Woelfel, J (1967) Comment on the Blumer–Bales dialogue concerning the interpretation of Mead’s thought. American Journal of Sociology 72(4): 409. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wolin, S (1981) Max Weber: Legitimation, method, and the politics of theory. Political Theory 9(3): 401–424. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Zerubavel, E (1981) Hidden Rhythms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar |
