Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 7, 2023

“Who made my clothes?” How transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields

Abstract

As the climate crisis accelerates, consumers, lawmakers, and activists demand transparent supply chains in industries that form the material backbone of cultural fields such as fashion. Consequently, new apps have emerged that promise to make supply chains transparent by translating opaque production data into easily comprehensible product ratings. Integrating the literature on transparency, cultural intermediaries, and digital consumption apps, this article asks: how do these apps, which I call transparency apps, afford politics in cultural fields and new political ways of consumption? Using fashion as a strategic case of a cultural field with strong material underpinnings, this paper combines a walkthrough analysis of Good On You, Retraced, and Renoon with interviews of employees of the first two. I found these apps to afford a politics of transparency consist of eco-progressive values embedded in ideologies of consumer rights and self-optimization, which elevates the technical-material logic of fashion at the cost of its aesthetic logic. This politics is usually offered in a personalized form resembling platformized cultural production. Transparency apps are thus politicizing cultural intermediaries that simultaneously enable and limit the political contestation of fashion. This article demonstrates how transparency apps bring politics to cultural fields, upsetting usual logics in the process, carrying implications for any cultural field that faces demands for supply chain transparency.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adler GJ, DellaPosta D, Lankes J (2022) Aesthetic style: how material objects structure an institutional field. Sociological Theory 40(1): 51–81.
Ananny M, Crawford K (2018) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media and Society 20(3): 973–989.
Aspers P, Godart F (2013) Sociology of fashion: order and change. Annual Review of Sociology 39(1): 171–192.
Balsiger P (2014) Between shaming corporations and promoting alternatives: the politics of an “ethical shopping map”. Journal of Consumer Culture 14(2): 218–235.
Balsiger P (2016) The Fight for Ethical Fashion. New York: Routledge.
Balsiger P (2021) The dynamics of “moralized markets”: a field perspective. Socio-Economic Review 19(1): 59–82.
Baumann S, Kennedy EH, Johnston J (2022) ‘Moral and Aesthetic Consecration and Higher Status Consumers’ Tastes: The “Good” Food Revolution’. Poetics [Preprint].
Birchall C (2014) Radical transparency? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14(1): 77–88.
Birchall C (2021) Radical Secrecy: The Ends of Transparency in Datafied America. Minneapolis: UMinnesota Press.
Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Braun V, Clarke V (2021) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Doing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry Gareth (2019) Thematic Analysis. In: Liamputtong P (ed). Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 843–860.
Callon M (2007) An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture and Society 24(7–8): 139–163.
Childress C, Baumann S, Rawlings C, et al. (2021) genres, objects, and the contemporary expression of higher-status tastes. Sociological Science 8: 230–264. Available at:.
Childress CC (2012) Decision-making, market logic and the rating mindset: negotiating BookScan in the field of US trade publishing. European Journal of Cultural Studies 15(5): 604–620.
Chong PK (2020) Inside the Critics’ Circle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cochoy F, Hagberg J, Hansson N (2017) Digitalizing Consumption: Tracing How Devices Shape Consumer Culture. NY: Routledge.
Colucci M, Pedroni M (2021) Got to be real: an investigation into the co-fabrication of authenticity by fashion companies and digital influencers. Journal of Consumer Culture 22(4): 929–948.
Crane D (2019) Fashion and artification in the french luxury fashion industry. Cultural Sociology 13(3): 293–304.
Cronin AM, Edwards L (2021) Resituating the political in cultural intermediary work: charity sector public relations and communication. European Journal of Cultural Studies 25: 148–165.
Davis JL, Chouinard JB (2016) Theorizing affordances: from request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 36(4): 241–248.
de Perthuis K, Findlay R (2019) How Fashion Travels: The Fashionable Ideal in the Age of Instagram. Fashion Theory 23(2): 219–242.
Dubuisson-Quellier S (2013) A market mediation strategy: how social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies 34(5–6): 683–703.
Entwistle J. (2009) The Aesthetic Economy of Fashion: Markets and Value in Clothing and Modelling. London: Bloomberg.
European Commission (2022) Communication from the commission: on making sustainable products the norm. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0140&qid=1649112555090 (accessed 15 July 2022).
Foster J (2022) “Scatter my ashes at Saks Fifth Avenue”: boundary work and intermediation in the fashion landscape. European Journal of Cultural Studies 22(2): 131–156.
Fuentes C, Sörum N (2019) Agencing ethical consumers: smartphone apps and the socio-material reconfiguration of everyday life. Consumption Markets and Culture 22(2).
Good on You (2021) 21 Tips for Better Sustainability Communication. Good on You.
GOY (2022) About. Available at: https://goodonyou.eco/about/(accessed 12 October 2022).
Habermas J (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hansson L (2017) Promoting ethical consumption: the construction of smartphone apps as “ethical” choice prescribers. In: Cochoy F, Hagberg J, Sorüm N (eds), Digitalizing Consumption: Tracing How Devices Shape Consumer Culture. NY: Routledge, pp. 103–122.
Heimstädt M (2017) Openwashing: a decoupling perspective on organizational transparency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 125: 77–86.
Hood C, Heald D (eds), (2006) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford UP.
Humphery K, Jordan T (2018) Mobile moralities: ethical consumption in the digital realm. Journal of Consumer Culture 18(4): 520–538.
Kawamura Y (2018) Fashion-ology: An Introduction to Fashion Studies. 2nd edition. London: Bloomsbury.
Lewis T, Potter E (eds), (2010) Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Light B, Burgess J, Duguay S (2018) The walkthrough method: an approach to the study of apps. New Media and Society 20(3): 881–900.
McKinsey and Business of Fashion (2022) State of Fashion 2022. McKinsey and Business of Fashion. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/state%20of%20fashion/2022/the-state-of-fashion-2022.pdf
Morris JW (2015) Curation by code: infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4–5): 446–463.
Muniesa F, Millo Y, Callon M (2007) An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review 55(2): 1–12.
Ocejo RE (2017) Masters of Craft: Old Jobs in the New Urban Economy, Masters of Craft. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Poell T, Nieborg D, van Dijck J (2019) Platformisation. Internet Policy Review 8(4).
Poell T, Nieborg DB, Duffy BE (2021) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity.
Renoon (2022) Renoon Sustainable Communication for Brands. Available at: https://business.renoon.com (accessed 12 October 2022).
Renoon (2022b) ‘The Sustainability framework' Available at: https://docsend.com/view/czyvng6demgyjg8n (accessed April 3rd, 2023)
Renoon a (no date a). About Us. Available at: https://renoon.com/about-us (accessed 5 October 2022).
Renoon b (no date b). Privacy Policy. Available at: https://renoon.com/privacy-policy (accessed 10 October 2022).
Retraced (2022) Retraced website, Retraced. Available at: https://www.retraced.com (accessed 12 October 2022).
Richards H (2021) Rethinking value: “radical transparency” in fashion. Continuum 35(6): 914–929.
Rocamora A (2017) Mediatization and digital media in the field of fashion. Fashion Theory 21(5): 505–522.
Smith Maguire J (2018) The taste for the particular: a logic of discernment in an age of omnivorousness. Journal of Consumer Culture 18(1): 3–20.
Smith Maguire J, Matthews J (2014) The Cultural Intermediaries Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sorum N (2020) Ethical consumption applications as failed market innovations: exploring consumer (non) acceptance of “quasi” market devices. Journal of Cultural Economy 13(1): 91–113.
Soutjis B (2020) The new digital face of the consumerist mediator: the case of the “Yuka” mobile app. Journal of Cultural Economy 13(1): 114–131.
Stolle D, Micheletti M (2013) Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Teurlings J, Stauff M (2014) Introduction: the transparency issue. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14(1): 3–10.
Thorbeck J (2022) ‘How to Fix Fashion’s Supply Chain? Begin with Culture’, the Business of Fashion. Available at: https://www.businessoffashion.com/opinions/retail/how-to-fix-fashions-supply-chain-begin-with-culture/(accessed20 July 2022).
Turra A (2021) 500 global invests in sustainable fashion start-up Renoon, WWD. Available at: https://wwd.com/sustainability/business/500-global-invests-in-sustainable-fashion-start-up-renoon-1234983253/(accessed 7 January 2022).
Van de Peer A (2023) the politics of fashion criticism: how newspaper journalists’ evaluative criteria for fashion changed between 1949 and 2010. In: Findlay R, Reponen J (eds) Insights on Fashion Journalism. London: Routledge.
Werron T (2014) On public forms of competition. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14(1): 62–76.

Biographies

Luuc Brans is a doctoral candidate at KU Leuven with a background in cultural sociology and political science. His research interests lie at the intersection of culture and politics, leading him to study themes ranging from sustainability and diversity in fashion to beauty ideologies in incel communities. He was recently a visiting fellow at Harvard University and co-curates the Culture & Inequality podcast of the European Center for the Study of Culture & Inequality.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 7, 2023
Issue published: November 2023

Keywords

  1. Transparency
  2. fashion
  3. cultural production
  4. cultural consumption
  5. cultural intermediaries
  6. supply chain transparency
  7. climate crisis
  8. consumer rights
  9. ethical consumption
  10. consumption apps

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luuc Brans

Notes

Luuc Brans, KU Leuven Center for Sociological Research, Parkstraat 45, bus 3601, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Consumer Culture.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 925

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Re-enchanting sustainable consumption: Cultural intermediaries, charisma, and fashion
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text