The Trouble with Learning Outcomes
Abstract
Recent decades have seen an increasing stress on the need to monitor and manage educators, and hold them to account. This article argues that, while learning outcomes can be valuable if properly used, they have been misappropriated and adopted widely at all levels within the education system to facilitate the managerial process. This has led to their distortion. The claim that they can be made precise by being written with a prescribed vocabulary of special descriptors so as to serve as objective, measurable devices for monitoring performance, is fundamentally mistaken, and they may be damaging to education when used in this way. After a brief sketch of the background to the notion of learning outcomes, arguments are presented to show their vacuity and uselessness when misused in this way, and explanations of their inadequacies are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
BARNETT, R. (1994) The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and The Open University press.
BIGGS, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
BOWLES, S & GINTIS, H. (1986) Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community and the Contradiction of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books.
DEARDEN, R. F. (1968) The Philosophy of Primary Education. London: Routledge.
DEARDEN, R., HIRST, P. H. & PETERS, R. S. (1972) Education and the Development of Reason. London: Routledge.
EDWARDS, M. (1998) ‘Commodification and Control in Mass Education: A Double Edged Sword’, in D. Jary and M. Parker (eds) The New Higher Education: Issues and Directions for the Post-Dearing University. Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
ENTWISTLE, N., SKINNER, D., ENTWISTLE, D. & ORR, S. (2000) ‘Conceptions and Beliefs about “Good Teaching”: An Integration of Contrasting Research Areas’, Higher Education Research & Development 19(1): 5–26.
GAGNE, R. M. (1974) Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: The Dryden Press, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
HIRST, P. H. (1974) Knowledge and the Curriculum. London: Routledge.
HIRST, P. H. & PETERS, R. S. (1970) The Logic of Education. London: Routledge.
HOLT, M. (1981) Evaluating Evaluators. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
ING, M. (1978) ‘Learning Theories’, in D. Lawton et al.(eds) Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies, pp. 61–70. London: Routledge.
LANGFORD, G. (1968) Philosophy and Education: An Introduction. London: Macmillan.
MEGGINSON, D. (1994) ‘Planned and Emergent Learning’, Executive Review 7(6): 29–32.
MEGGINSON, D. (1996) ‘Planned and Emergent Learning’, Management Learning 27(4): 411–428.
MOON, J. (1999) Guidance for Writing and Using Learning Outcomes. Exeter: University of Exeter.
PETERS, R. S. (1966) Ethics and Education. London: Unwin.
PETERS, R. S. (1967) The Concept of Education. London: Routledge.
POWER, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: OUP.
RYLE, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
SHORE, C. & SELWYN, T. (1998) ‘The Marketisation of Higher Education: Management, Discourse and the Politics of Performance’, in D. Jary & M. Parker (eds) The New Higher Education: Issues and Directions for the Post-Dearing University. Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
SLATER, B. & TAPPER, T. (1994) The State and Higher Education. London: The Wooburn Press.
STRATHERN, M. (2000) ‘The Tyranny of Transparency’, British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309–321.
TSOUKAS, H. (1997) ‘The Tyranny of Light’, Futures 29(9): 827–843.
WHITEHEAD, A. N. (1929) The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: Macmillan.
WINTER, R. (1995) ‘The University of Life PLC: The Industrialization of Higher Education?’, in J. Smythe (ed.) Academic Work–The Changing Labour Process in Higher Education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and The Open University Press.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: November 2002
Issue published: November 2002
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Active Learning in Higher Education.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 5707
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 128
- Daring to Stop: Challenging Program-Level Learning Outcome Measurement in Urban Planning Accreditation
- Generative AI’s Impact on Critical Thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s Taxonomy
- 2024 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)
- Educational governance and the construction of learning outcomes of young adults in Europe: conceptual aspects and empirical evidence
- Das Potenzial des informellen Lernens am Arbeitsplatz
- Gamification improves learning: Experience in a training activity of computer programming in higher education
- The Influence of Organizational Factors on the School’s Achievements
- Multilevel Pedagogical Leadership in Higher Education
- An evaluation of the impact of academic accreditation on the quality of higher education: lessons learnt from the academics’ perceptions
- “Show me how to use a microscope” – The development and evaluation of certification as direct assessment of practical lab skills
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
