Emulating global climate change impacts on crop yields

First Published January 18, 2015 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Department of Environment, Earth & Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
by this author
, 1
 
Department of Environment, Earth & Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
by this author
, 1
 
Department of Environment, Earth & Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
by this author
,
2
 
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
by this author
, 3
 
Research Domain of Earth System Analysis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegrafenberg A62, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
by this author
, 3
 
Research Domain of Earth System Analysis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegrafenberg A62, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
by this author
...
First Published Online: January 18, 2015

The potential effects of climate change on the environment and society are many. In order to effectively quantify the uncertainty associated with these effects, highly complex simulation models are run with detailed representations of ecosystem processes. These models are computationally expensive and can involve a computer run of several days. Computationally cheaper models can be obtained from large ensembles of simulations using statistical emulation. The purpose of this article is to construct a cheaper computational model (emulator) from simulations of the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land (LPJmL), which is a dynamic global vegetation and crop model. This article focuses on statistical emulation of potential crop yields from LPJmL and an emulator is constructed using a combination of ordinary least squares, principal component analysis and weighted least squares methods. For five climate models, under cross-validation, the percentage of variance explained ranges from 60 to 88% for the rainfed crops and 62 to 93% for the irrigated crops. The emulator can be used to predict potential crop yield change under any future climate scenarios and management options.

Arnell, NW, Lowe, JA, Brown, S, Gosling, SN et al. (2013) A global assessment of the effects of climate policy on the impacts of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3 19512.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bondeau, A, Smith, PC, Zaehele, S, Schaphoff, S et al. (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13, 128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bornn, L, Zidek, JV (2012) Efficient stabilization of crop yield prediction in the Canadian Prairies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 152, 22332.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cressie, N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. New York: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Deryng, D, Sacks, WJ, Barford, CC, Ramankutty, N (2011) Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 25, GB2006. DOI: 10.1029/2009GB003765.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fader, M, Rost, S, Muller, C, Bondeau, A et al. (2010) Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns. Journal of Hydrology, 384, 21831.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fischer, G, Shah, M, van, Velthuizen H, Nachtergaele, FO (2001) Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century. IIASA Research Report 02-02, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, p. 119.
Google Scholar
Higdon, D, Gattiker, J, Williams, B, Rightley, M (2008) Computer model calibration using high-dimensional input. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 57083.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Holden, PB, Edwards, NR, Oliver, KIC, Lenton, TM et al. (2010) A probabilistic calibration of climate sensitivity and terrestrial carbon change in GENIE-1, Climate Dynamics, 35, 785806.
Google Scholar
Holden, PB, Edwards, NR, Garthwaite, PH, Fraedrich, K et al. (2014) PLASIM-ENTSem v1. 0: a spatio-temporal emulator of future climate change for impacts assessment. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 43351.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report (2014) Edited by R K Pachauri, L Meyer and the Core Writing Team. Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr
Google Scholar
Jones, JW, Hoogenboom, G, Porter, CH, Boote, KJ et al. (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Jounal of Agronomy. 18, 23565.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kart, RW (1979) Sensitivity analysis of statistical crop weather models. Agricultural Meteorology, 20, 291300.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kim, Y, Lee, J, Kim, J (2005) Bayesian bootstrap analysis of doubly censored data using Gibbs sampler. Statistica Sinica, 15, 96980.
Google Scholar | ISI
Leemans, R, Solomon, A (1993) Modeling the potential change in yield and distribution of the earth's crops under a warmed climate. Climate Research, 3, 7996.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lobell, DB, Burke, MB (2008) Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Environmental Research Letter, 3, 034007.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lobell, DB, Burke, MB (2010) On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150, 144352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lobell, DB, Cahill, KN, Field, CB (2006) Weather-based yield forecasts developed for 12 California crops. California Agriculture, 60, 21014.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Matis, JH, Birkett, T, Boudreaux, D (1989) An application of the Markov chain approach to forecasting cotton yields from Surveys. Agricultural Systems, 29, 35770.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meinshausen, M, Raper, SC, Wigley, TM (2011) Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmospheric, Chemistry and Physics, 11, 141756.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Moore, MR, Gollehon, NR, Hellerstein, DM (2000) Estimating producer's surplus with the censored regression model: an application to producers affected by Columbia River Basin Salmon Recovery. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25, 32546.
Google Scholar | ISI
Moss, RH, Edmonds, JA, Hibbard, KA, Manning, MR et al. (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463, 74756.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Muller, C, Robertson, R (2014) Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agricultural Economics, 45, 3750.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
O'Hagan, A (2006) Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: a tutorial. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1290300.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Osborn, TJ (2009) A user guide for ClimGen: a flexible tool for generating monthly climate data sets and scenarios. Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17.
Google Scholar
Osborne, T, Rose, G, Wheeler, T (2013) Variation in global-scale impacts of climate change on crop productivity due to climate model uncertainty and adaptation. Agriculutural and Forest Meteorology, 170, 18394.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Osborne, TM, Wheeler, TR (2013) Evidence for a climate signal in trends of global crop yield variability over the past 50 years. Environmental Research Letter, 8, 024001.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Parry, ML, Rosenzweig, C, Iglesias, A, Livermore, M et al. (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 14, 5367.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar
Reddy, VR, Pachepsky, YA (2000) Predicting crop yields under climate change conditions from monthly GCM weather projections. Environmental Modelling and Software, 15, 7986.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rosenzweig, C, Elliott, J, Deryng, D, Ruane, AC et al. (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 326873.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Saltelli, A (2002) Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communication, 145, 28097.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schlenker, W, Roberts, MJ (2006) Estimating the impact of climate change on crop yields: the importance of non-linear temperature effects (with discussion), 0607-01, Department of Economics Columbia University New York, NY.
Google Scholar
Sitch, S, Smith, B, Prentice, IC, Arneth, A et al. (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9, 16185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smith, P, Gregory, PJ (2013) Climate change and sustainable food production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72, 2128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Solomon, S (2007) (ed) Climate change: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
UNFPA (2010) State of world population 2010: from conflict and crisis to renewal: generations of change. United Nations Population Fund. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2010/web/en/pdf/ENSOWP10.pdf
Google Scholar
Wallach, D (2011) Crop model calibration: a statistical perspective. Agronomy Journal, 103, 114451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Warren, R, Lowe, JA, Arnell, NW, Hope, C et al. (2013) The AVOID programme's new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 120, 5570.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

SMJ-article-ppv for GBP29.00
SMJ-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP204.75
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $250.00