Abstract
The potential effects of climate change on the environment and society are many. In order to effectively quantify the uncertainty associated with these effects, highly complex simulation models are run with detailed representations of ecosystem processes. These models are computationally expensive and can involve a computer run of several days. Computationally cheaper models can be obtained from large ensembles of simulations using statistical emulation. The purpose of this article is to construct a cheaper computational model (emulator) from simulations of the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land (LPJmL), which is a dynamic global vegetation and crop model. This article focuses on statistical emulation of potential crop yields from LPJmL and an emulator is constructed using a combination of ordinary least squares, principal component analysis and weighted least squares methods. For five climate models, under cross-validation, the percentage of variance explained ranges from 60 to 88% for the rainfed crops and 62 to 93% for the irrigated crops. The emulator can be used to predict potential crop yield change under any future climate scenarios and management options.
References
| Arnell, NW, Lowe, JA, Brown, S, Gosling, SN et al. (2013) A global assessment of the effects of climate policy on the impacts of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3 19–512. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bondeau, A, Smith, PC, Zaehele, S, Schaphoff, S et al. (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13, 1–28. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bornn, L, Zidek, JV (2012) Efficient stabilization of crop yield prediction in the Canadian Prairies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 152, 223–32. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Cressie, N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
| Deryng, D, Sacks, WJ, Barford, CC, Ramankutty, N (2011) Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 25, GB2006. DOI: 10.1029/2009GB003765. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Fader, M, Rost, S, Muller, C, Bondeau, A et al. (2010) Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns. Journal of Hydrology, 384, 218–31. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Fischer, G, Shah, M, van, Velthuizen H, Nachtergaele, FO (2001) Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century. IIASA Research Report 02-02, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, p. 119. Google Scholar | |
| Higdon, D, Gattiker, J, Williams, B, Rightley, M (2008) Computer model calibration using high-dimensional input. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 570–83. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Holden, PB, Edwards, NR, Oliver, KIC, Lenton, TM et al. (2010) A probabilistic calibration of climate sensitivity and terrestrial carbon change in GENIE-1, Climate Dynamics, 35, 785–806. Google Scholar | |
| Holden, PB, Edwards, NR, Garthwaite, PH, Fraedrich, K et al. (2014) PLASIM-ENTSem v1. 0: a spatio-temporal emulator of future climate change for impacts assessment. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 433–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report (2014) Edited by R K Pachauri, L Meyer and the Core Writing Team. Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr Google Scholar | |
| Jones, JW, Hoogenboom, G, Porter, CH, Boote, KJ et al. (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Jounal of Agronomy. 18, 235–65. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Kart, RW (1979) Sensitivity analysis of statistical crop weather models. Agricultural Meteorology, 20, 291–300. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Kim, Y, Lee, J, Kim, J (2005) Bayesian bootstrap analysis of doubly censored data using Gibbs sampler. Statistica Sinica, 15, 969–80. Google Scholar | ISI | |
| Leemans, R, Solomon, A (1993) Modeling the potential change in yield and distribution of the earth's crops under a warmed climate. Climate Research, 3, 79–96. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Lobell, DB, Burke, MB (2008) Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Environmental Research Letter, 3, 034007. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Lobell, DB, Burke, MB (2010) On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150, 1443–52. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Lobell, DB, Cahill, KN, Field, CB (2006) Weather-based yield forecasts developed for 12 California crops. California Agriculture, 60, 210–14. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Matis, JH, Birkett, T, Boudreaux, D (1989) An application of the Markov chain approach to forecasting cotton yields from Surveys. Agricultural Systems, 29, 357–70. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Meinshausen, M, Raper, SC, Wigley, TM (2011) Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmospheric, Chemistry and Physics, 11, 1417–56. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Moore, MR, Gollehon, NR, Hellerstein, DM (2000) Estimating producer's surplus with the censored regression model: an application to producers affected by Columbia River Basin Salmon Recovery. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25, 325–46. Google Scholar | ISI | |
| Moss, RH, Edmonds, JA, Hibbard, KA, Manning, MR et al. (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463, 747–56. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Muller, C, Robertson, R (2014) Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agricultural Economics, 45, 37–50. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| O'Hagan, A (2006) Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: a tutorial. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1290–300. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Osborn, TJ (2009) A user guide for ClimGen: a flexible tool for generating monthly climate data sets and scenarios. Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17. Google Scholar | |
| Osborne, T, Rose, G, Wheeler, T (2013) Variation in global-scale impacts of climate change on crop productivity due to climate model uncertainty and adaptation. Agriculutural and Forest Meteorology, 170, 183–94. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Osborne, TM, Wheeler, TR (2013) Evidence for a climate signal in trends of global crop yield variability over the past 50 years. Environmental Research Letter, 8, 024001. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Parry, ML, Rosenzweig, C, Iglesias, A, Livermore, M et al. (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 14, 53–67. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/. Google Scholar | |
| Reddy, VR, Pachepsky, YA (2000) Predicting crop yields under climate change conditions from monthly GCM weather projections. Environmental Modelling and Software, 15, 79–86. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Rosenzweig, C, Elliott, J, Deryng, D, Ruane, AC et al. (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 3268–73. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Saltelli, A (2002) Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communication, 145, 280–97. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Schlenker, W, Roberts, MJ (2006) Estimating the impact of climate change on crop yields: the importance of non-linear temperature effects (with discussion), 0607-01, Department of Economics Columbia University New York, NY. Google Scholar | |
| Sitch, S, Smith, B, Prentice, IC, Arneth, A et al. (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9, 161–85. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Smith, P, Gregory, PJ (2013) Climate change and sustainable food production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72, 21–28. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Solomon, S (2007) (ed) Climate change: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| UNFPA (2010) State of world population 2010: from conflict and crisis to renewal: generations of change. United Nations Population Fund. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2010/web/en/pdf/ENSOWP10.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Wallach, D (2011) Crop model calibration: a statistical perspective. Agronomy Journal, 103, 1144–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Warren, R, Lowe, JA, Arnell, NW, Hope, C et al. (2013) The AVOID programme's new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 120, 55–70. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
