Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 17, 2019

SHMnet: Condition assessment of bolted connection with beyond human-level performance

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms are transforming a variety of research areas with accuracy levels that the traditional methods cannot compete with. Recently, increasingly more research efforts have been put into the structural health monitoring domain. In this work, we propose a new deep convolutional neural network, namely SHMnet, for a challenging structural condition identification case, that is, steel frame with bolted connection damage. We perform systematic studies on the optimisation of network architecture and the preparation of the training data. In the laboratory, repeated impact hammer tests are conducted on a steel frame with different bolted connection damage scenarios, as small as one bolt loosened. The time-domain monitoring data from a single accelerometer are used for training. We conduct parametric studies on different layer numbers, different sensor locations, the quantity of the training datasets and noise levels. The results show that the proposed SHMnet is effective and reliable with at least four independent training datasets and by avoiding vibration node points as sensor locations. Under up to 60% additive Gaussian noise, the average identification accuracy is over 98%. In comparison, the traditional methods based on the identified modal parameters inevitably fail due to the unnoticeable changes of identified natural frequencies and mode shapes. The results provide confidence in using the developed method as an effective structural condition identification framework. It has the potential to transform the structural health monitoring practice. The code and relevant information can be found at https://github.com/capepoint/SHMnet.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lacey AW, Chen W, Hao H, et al. Structural response of modular buildings – an overview. J Build Eng 2018; 16: 45–56.
2. Blachowski B, Gutkowski W. Effect of damaged circular flange-bolted connections on behaviour of tall towers, modelled by multilevel substructuring. Eng Struct 2016; 111: 93–103.
3. Li J, Hao H. Health monitoring of joint conditions in steel truss bridges with relative displacement sensors. Measurement 2016; 88: 360–371.
4. Cha YJ, You K, Choi W. Vision-based detection of loosened bolts using the Hough transform and support vector machines. Automat Construct 2016; 71: 181–188.
5. Kong X, Li J. Image registration-based bolt loosening detection of steel joints. Sensors 2018; 18(4): E1000.
6. Zhao X, Zhang Y, Wang N. Bolt loosening angle detection technology using deep learning. Struct Contr Health Monit 2019; 26(1): e2292.
7. Wang T, Song G, Wang Z, et al. Proof-of-concept study of monitoring bolt connection status using a piezoelectric based active sensing method. Smart Mater Struct 2013; 22(8): 087001.
8. Shao J, Wang T, Yin H, et al. Bolt looseness detection based on piezoelectric impedance frequency shift. Appl Sci 2016; 6(10): 298.
9. Wang F, Huo L, Song G. A piezoelectric active sensing method for quantitative monitoring of bolt loosening using energy dissipation caused by tangential damping based on the fractal contact theory. Smart Mater Struct 2017; 27(1): 015023.
10. Yuan R, Lv Y, Kong Q, et al. Percussion-based bolt looseness monitoring using intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and BP neural network. Smart Mater Struct. Epub ahead of print14 August 2019.
11. Kong Q, Zhu J, Ho SCM, et al. Tapping and listening: a new approach to bolt looseness monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 2018; 27(7): 07LT02.
12. Zhang Y, Zhao X, Sun X, et al. Bolt loosening detection based on audio classification. Adv Struct Eng 2019; 22: 2882-2891.
13. Chen D, Huo L, Li H, et al. A fiber bragg grating (FBG)-enabled smart washer for bolt pre-load measurement: design, analysis, calibration, and experimental validation. Sensors 2018; 18(8): 2586.
14. Wang F, Ho M, Song G. Monitoring of early looseness of multi-bolt connection: a new entropy-based active sensing method without saturation. Smart Mater Struct 2019; 28: 10LT01.
15. Zhang Y, Sun X, Loh KJ, et al. Autonomous bolt loosening detection using deep learning. Struct Health Monit. Epub ahead of print 19 March 2019.
16. Yang JN, Xia Y, Loh CH. Damage identification of bolt connections in a steel frame. J Struct Eng 2013; 140(3): 04013064.
17. He K, Zhu W. Structural damage detection using changes in natural frequencies: theory and applications. J Phys Conf Ser 2011; 305: 012054.
18. Yun CB, Yi JH, Bahng EY. Joint damage assessment of framed structures using a neural networks technique. Eng Struct 2001; 23(5): 425–435.
19. Ay AM, Khoo S, Wang Y. Probability distribution of decay rate: a statistical time-domain damping parameter for structural damage identification. Struct Health Monit 2019; 18(1): 66–86.
20. Farrar C, Worden K. Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2013.
21. LeCun YA, Bengio Y, Hinton GE. Deep learning. Nature 2015; 521: 436–444.
22. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016; 529: 484–489.
23. Nair V, Hinton GE. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), Haifa, Israel, 21–24 June 2010, pp. 807–814. Madison, WI: Omnipress.
24. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 2014; 15(1): 1929–1958.
25. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, 3–6 December 2012, pp. 1097–1105. New York: Curran Associates.
26. Cha YJ, Choi W, Büyüköztürk O. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 2017; 32(5): 361–378.
27. Bao Y, Tang Z, Li H, et al. Computer vision and deep learning-based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2018; 18: 401-421.
28. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz S, et al. Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J Sound Vib 2017; 388: 154–170.
29. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, et al. 1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomputing 2018; 275: 1308–1317.
30. Pathirage CSN, Li J, Li L, et al. Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng Struct 2018; 172: 13–28.
31. Pathirage CSN, Li J, Li L, et al. Development and application of a deep learning–based sparse autoencoder framework for structural damage identification. Struct Health Monit 2019; 18(1): 103–122.
32. Zhang T, Wang Y. Deep learning algorithms for structural condition identification with limited monitoring data. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on smart infrastructure and construction (ICSIC 2019), Cambridge, 8–10 July 2019.
33. Wang Y, Hao H. Damage identification scheme based on compressive sensing. J Comput Civil Eng 2013; 29(2): 04014037.
34. Ewins D. Modal testing: theory, practice and application. Baldock: Research Studies Press, 2000.
35. Biswal S, Wang Y. Optimal sensor placement strategy for the identification of local bolted connection failures in steel structures. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on smart infrastructure and construction (ICSIC 2019), Cambridge, 8–10 July 2019.
36. Kim BH, Stubbs N, Park T. A new method to extract modal parameters using output-only responses. J Sound Vib 2005; 282(1–2): 215–230.
37. Salawu O. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 1997; 19(9): 718–723.
38. Zhang T, Biswal S, Wang Y. Deep convolutional neural network for condition identification of connections in steel structures. In: International workshop on structural health monitoring (IWSHM 2019), Stanford, CA, 10–12 September 2019.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 17, 2019
Issue published: July 2020

Keywords

  1. Deep learning
  2. condition identification
  3. convolutional neural network
  4. data preparation
  5. bolted connection

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2019.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tong Zhang
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, UK
Suryakanta Biswal
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Ying Wang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

Notes

Ying Wang, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Structural Health Monitoring.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 640

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 48 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 45

  1. Path planning and topology-aided acoustic emission damage localization in high-strength bolt connections of bridges
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Minimal Realization Time-Delay Koopman Analysis for Nonlinear System Identification
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Modular approach to model order reduction for offshore wind turbines supported by multi-bucket jacket foundation
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Damage Identification for Jacket-Supported Offshore Wind Turbines with Limited Measurements
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Machine-learning-based bridge damage detection using train-borne measurements
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolted lap joint loosening monitoring and damage identification based on acoustic emission and machine learning
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolt loosening status classification via wave energy dissipation measurements with temperature-compensated deep learning by piezoelectric active sensing
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Physics-guided deep learning based on modal sensitivity for structural damage identification with unseen damage patterns
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Quantitative damage evaluation of curved plates based on phased array guided wave and deep learning algorithm
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Advancements in Optimal Sensor Placement for Enhanced Structural Health Monitoring: Current Insights and Future Prospects
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text