![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
A number of electoral reforms have been enacted in the United States in the past three decades that are designed to increase turnout by easing restrictions on the casting of ballots. Both proponents and opponents of electoral reforms agree that these reforms should increase the demographic representativeness of the electorate by reducing the direct costs of voting, thereby increasing turnout among less-privileged groups who, presumably, are most sensitive to the costs of coming to the polls. In fact, these reforms have been greatly contested because both major political parties believe that increasing turnout among less-privileged groups will benefit Democratic politicians. I review evidence from numerous studies of electoral reform to demonstrate that reforms designed to make it easier for registered voters to cast their ballots actually increase, rather than reduce, socioeconomicbiases in the composition of the voting public. I conclude with a recommendation that we shift the focus of electoral reform from an emphasis on institutional changes to a concentration on political engagement.
|
Achen, C. H. , & Shively, W. P. (1995). Cross-level inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Alvarez, R. M. L. , Ansolabehere, S. , & Wilson, C. H. (2002). Election day voter registration in the United States: How one-step voting can change the composition of the American electorate. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project Working Paper. Google Scholar | |
|
Alvarez, R. M. L. , & Hall, T. E. (2004). Point, click, andvote: The future of internet voting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar | |
|
Alvarez, R. M. , & Nagler, J. (2001). The likely consequences of Internet voting for political representation. Loyola Law Review, 34, 1115-1153. Google Scholar | |
|
Althoff, S. (2004, March 7). Point, click, elect. Boston Globe Magazine, p. 26-26. Google Scholar | |
|
Bennett, S. E. , & Resnick, D. (1990). The implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 771-802. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Berinsky, A. J. (2002). Silent voices: Social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 276-287. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Berinsky, A. J. (2004). Silent voices: Opinion polls and political participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Berinsky, A. J. , N. Burns, & Traugott, M. W. (2001).Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of vote-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 178-197. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Brody, R. A. , & Sniderman, P. M. (1977). From life space to polling place: The relevance of personal concerns for voting behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 7, 337-360. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Calvert, J. W. , & Gilchrist, J. (1993). Suppose they held an election and almost everybody came! PS: Political Science and Politics, 26, 695-700. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Campbell, A. (1966). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. In A. Campbell , P. E. Converse , W. Miller , & D. Stokes (Eds.), Elections and the political order (pp.40-62).New York: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Citrin, J. , Schickler, E. , & Sides, J. (2003). What if everyone voted? Simulating the impact of increased turnout in senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 75-90. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Delli Carpini, M. X. , & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
DeNardo, J. (1980). Turnout and the vote: The joke’s on the Democrats. American Political Science Review, 74, 406-420. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gerber, A. S. , Green, D. P. , & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming:Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 540-550. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gibson, R. (2002). Elections online: Assessing internet voting in light of the Arizona democratic primary. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 561-583. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hajnal, Z. , & Trounstine, J. (in press). Where turnout matters: The consequences of uneven turnout in city politics. Journal of Politics. Google Scholar | ISI | |
| Hanmer, M. J. (2004). From selection to election and beyond: Understanding the causes and consequences of electoral reform in America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Google Scholar | |
| Hansen, J. M. (2001). Early voting, unrestricted absentee voting, and voting by mail. Unpublished report of the Task Force on the Federal Election System. Google Scholar | |
|
Highton, B. (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 59, 565-575. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Highton, B. (2004).Registration and voting in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 507-515. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Karp, J. A. , & Banducci, S. A. (2000). Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22, 223-239. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Karp, J. A. , & Banducci, S. A. (2001). Absentee voting, mobilization, and participation. American Politics Research, 29, 183-195. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Knack, S. , & White, J. (2000). Election-day registration and turnout inequality. Political Behavior, 22, 29-44. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Leighley, J. E. , & Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964-1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review, 86, 725-736. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Magleby, D. (1987). Participation in mail ballot elections. Western Political Quarterly, 40, 79-91. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mitchell, G. E. , & Wlezien, C. (1995). The impact of legal constraints on voter registration, turnout, and the composition of the American Electorate. Political Behavior, 17, 179-202. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nagel, J. H. , & McNulty, J. E. (1996). Partisan effects of voter turnout in senatorial and gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 90, 780-793. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Neely, G. W. , & Richardson, L. E., Jr. (2001). Who is early voting? An individual level examination. The Social Science Journal, 38, 381-392. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Oliver, J. E. (1996). The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 498-513. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Piven, F. F. , & Cloward, R. A. (1989). Government statistics and conflicting expectations of nonvoting. PS: Political Science and Politics, 22, 578-589. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Presser, S. , & Traugott, M. (1992). Little white lies and social science models: Correlated response errors in a panel study of voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 77-86. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rosenstone, S. J. , & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: MacMillian. Google Scholar | |
|
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Sigelman, L. , & Jewell, M. E. (1986). From core to periphery: A note on the imagery of concentric electorates. Journal of Politics, 48, 440-449. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Silver, B. D. , Anderson, B. A. , & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? The American Political Science Review, 80, 613-624. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Southwell, P. , & Burchett, J. (1997). Survey of vote-by-mail senate election in the state of Oregon. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30, 53-57. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Southwell, P. , & Burchett, J. (2000). Does changing the rules change the players? The effect of all-mail elections on the composition of the electorate. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 837-845. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Stein, R. M. (1998). Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 57-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stein, R. M. , & Garcia-Monet, P. A. (1997).Voting early, but not often. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 657-671. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Traugott, M. W. (2004). Why electoral reform has failed: If you build it, will they come? In A. N. Crigler , M. R. Just , & E. McCaffery (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wolfinger, R. , & Highton, B. (1998). Estimating the effects of the national voter registration act of 1993. Political Behavior, 20, 79-104. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wolfinger, R. , & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Whovotes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K. L. , & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K. L. , Brady, H. E. , & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review, 8, 303-318. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
