Abstract
Bill sponsorship is a valuable form of legislative activity in which all legislators are free to signal priorities, stake out positions, and influence legislative agendas. However, decisions to hone in on specific issues have been mostly overlooked, resulting in drivers of issue-specific sponsorship remaining unclear. A reasonable place to look for drivers is constituent preferences, given the representational responsibilities underlying most legislative behavior. To address this question, I leverage advances in opinion estimation to generate a new fine-grained measure of constituent issue preferences at the district level. By keeping the focus on issues, this approach is preferable to other measures of constituent preferences, in that it assumes nothing about constituents’ ideology. Through numerous tests across several issues spanning the 109th to 113th Congresses, I find a largely indirect effect of preferences on sponsorship through employment proxies, yet no consistent direct impact from constituents, opposite expectations of the delegate model of representation.
References
|
Adler, E. S., Lapinski, J. S. (1997). Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 895-918. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Adler, E. S., Wilkerson, J. D. (2012). Congress and the politics of problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010a). CCES Common Content, 2006, hdl:1902.1/14002, Harvard Dataverse, V4. Cambridge: Harvard University. Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010b). CCES Common Content, 2007, hdl:1902.1/14078, Harvard Dataverse, V3. Cambridge: Harvard University. Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010c). CCES, Common Content, 2008, hdl:1902.1/14003, Harvard Dataverse, V6. Cambridge: Harvard University. Google Scholar | |
|
Bafumi, J., Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519-542. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Barnello, M. A., Bratton, K. A. (2007). Bridging the gender gap in bill sponsorship. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 449-474. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bauer, R. A., de Pool, I. S., Dexter, L. A. (1972). American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton. Google Scholar | |
|
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, D. B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Bibby, J. F. (1966). Committee characteristics and legislative oversight of administration. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 78-98. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bishin, B. G. (2009). Tyranny of the minority: The subconstituency politics theory of representation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Broockman, D. E. (2016). Approaches to studying policy representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41, 181-215. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29-40. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Burstein, P. S., Bauldry Froese, P. (2005). Bill sponsorship and congressional support for policy proposals, from introduction to enactment or disappearance. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 295-302. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Cox, G. W. (2001). Agenda setting in the U.S. House: A majority-party monopoly? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 185-210. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cox, G. W., McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cox, G. W., McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cox, G. W., Poole, K. T. (2002). On measuring partisanship in roll-call voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 477-489. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Damore, D. F. (2004). The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 391-397. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Druckman, J. N., Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 1-24. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Egan, P. J. (2013). Partisan priorities: How issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C. (1980). Policy representation of constituency interests. Political Behavior, 2, 91-106. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Eulau, H., Wahlke, J. C., Buchanan, W., Ferguson, L. C. (1959). The role of the representative: Some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review, 53, 742-756. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fowler, A., Hall, A. B. (2016). The elusive quest for convergence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11131-11149. Google Scholar | |
|
Freeman, P. K., Richardson, L. E. (1996). Explaining variation in casework among state legislators. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21, 41-56. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gailmard, S., Jenkins, J. A. (2007). Negative agenda control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of majority party power. Journal of Politics, 69, 689-700. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gilligan, T. W., Krehbiel, K. (1989). Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 459-490. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Griffin, J. D., Keane, M. (2011). Are African Americans effectively represented in congress? Political Research Quarterly, 64, 145-156. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Harden, J. J. (2016). Multidimensional democracy: A supply and demand theory of representation in American legislatures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Herring, M. (1990). Legislative responsiveness to black constituents in three deep south states. Journal of Politics, 52, 740-758. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Highton, B., Rocca, M. S. (2005). Beyond the roll-call arena: The determinants of position taking in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 303-316. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Jacobs, L. R., Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88, 560-576. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kirkland, J. H., Harden, J. J. (2016). Representation, competing principals, and waffling on bills in U.S. legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41, 657-686. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lawrence, E. D., Maltzman, F., Smith, S. S. (2006). Who wins? Party effects in legislative voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31, 33-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lax, J., Phillips, J. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367-386. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lax, J., Phillips, J. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 148-166. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Miler, K. C. (2010). Constituency representation in congress: The view from Capitol Hill. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599-626. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Platt, M. B., Sinclair-Chapman, V. (2008, January 9-12). Legislative problem-solving: Exploring bill sponsorship in post-war America. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar | |
|
Rocca, M. S., Gordon, S. B. (2010). The position-taking value of bill sponsorship in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 387-397. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rocca, M. S., Sanchez, G. R. (2008). The effect of race and ethnicity on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in congress. American Politics Research, 36, 130-152. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sanburn, J. (2015). These 3 maps show where the great recession hit hardest. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://time.com/4133963/us-census-poverty-income-great-recession/ Google Scholar | |
|
Schiller, W. (1995). Senators as political entrepreneurs: Using bill sponsorship to shape legislative agendas. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 186-203. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Shipan, C. R., Lowry, W. R. (2001). Environmental policy and party divergence in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 245-263. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Stewart, C., Woon, J. (2017). Congressional committee assignments, 103rd to 114th congresses, 1993–2017. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar | |
|
Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How opinion movements shape American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sulkin, T. (2005). Issue politics in congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sulkin, T. (2009). Campaign appeals and legislative action. Journal of Politics, 71, 1093-1108. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tate, K. (2001). The political representation of blacks in congress: Does race matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 623-638. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C. (2013). Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. Journal of Politics, 75, 330-342. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Verba, S. (1996). The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy. Presidential address, American political science association, 1995. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 1-7. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Volden, C., Wiseman, A. E. (2014). Legislative effectiveness in the United States Congress: The lawmakers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Warshaw, C., Rodden, J. (2012). How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues? Journal of Politics, 74, 203-219. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Whitby, K. J. (2002). Bill sponsorship and intraracial voting among African American representatives. American Politics Research, 30, 93-109. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Wilson, W. C. (2010). Descriptive representation and Latino interest bill sponsorship in congress. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 1043-1062. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981-1000. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wlezien, C. (1996). Dynamics of representation: The case of U.S. spending on defence. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 81-103. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Woon, J. (2008). Bill sponsorship in congress: The moderating effect of agenda positions on legislative proposals. Journal of Politics, 70, 201-216. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Woon, J. (2009). Issue attention and legislative proposals in the U.S. senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 29-54. Google Scholar | Crossref |

