Bill sponsorship is a valuable form of legislative activity in which all legislators are free to signal priorities, stake out positions, and influence legislative agendas. However, decisions to hone in on specific issues have been mostly overlooked, resulting in drivers of issue-specific sponsorship remaining unclear. A reasonable place to look for drivers is constituent preferences, given the representational responsibilities underlying most legislative behavior. To address this question, I leverage advances in opinion estimation to generate a new fine-grained measure of constituent issue preferences at the district level. By keeping the focus on issues, this approach is preferable to other measures of constituent preferences, in that it assumes nothing about constituents’ ideology. Through numerous tests across several issues spanning the 109th to 113th Congresses, I find a largely indirect effect of preferences on sponsorship through employment proxies, yet no consistent direct impact from constituents, opposite expectations of the delegate model of representation.

Adler, E. S., Lapinski, J. S. (1997). Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 895-918.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Adler, E. S., Wilkerson, J. D. (2012). Congress and the politics of problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ansolabehere, S. (2010a). CCES Common Content, 2006, hdl:1902.1/14002, Harvard Dataverse, V4. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S. (2010b). CCES Common Content, 2007, hdl:1902.1/14078, Harvard Dataverse, V3. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S. (2010c). CCES, Common Content, 2008, hdl:1902.1/14003, Harvard Dataverse, V6. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Google Scholar
Bafumi, J., Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519-542.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Barnello, M. A., Bratton, K. A. (2007). Bridging the gender gap in bill sponsorship. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 449-474.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bauer, R. A., de Pool, I. S., Dexter, L. A. (1972). American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, D. B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Bibby, J. F. (1966). Committee characteristics and legislative oversight of administration. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 78-98.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bishin, B. G. (2009). Tyranny of the minority: The subconstituency politics theory of representation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar
Broockman, D. E. (2016). Approaches to studying policy representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41, 181-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29-40.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Burstein, P. S., Bauldry Froese, P. (2005). Bill sponsorship and congressional support for policy proposals, from introduction to enactment or disappearance. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 295-302.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cox, G. W. (2001). Agenda setting in the U.S. House: A majority-party monopoly? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 185-210.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cox, G. W., McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cox, G. W., Poole, K. T. (2002). On measuring partisanship in roll-call voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 477-489.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Damore, D. F. (2004). The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 391-397.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Druckman, J. N., Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 1-24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Egan, P. J. (2013). Partisan priorities: How issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C. (1980). Policy representation of constituency interests. Political Behavior, 2, 91-106.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Eulau, H., Wahlke, J. C., Buchanan, W., Ferguson, L. C. (1959). The role of the representative: Some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review, 53, 742-756.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fowler, A., Hall, A. B. (2016). The elusive quest for convergence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11131-11149.
Google Scholar
Freeman, P. K., Richardson, L. E. (1996). Explaining variation in casework among state legislators. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21, 41-56.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gailmard, S., Jenkins, J. A. (2007). Negative agenda control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of majority party power. Journal of Politics, 69, 689-700.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gilligan, T. W., Krehbiel, K. (1989). Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 459-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Griffin, J. D., Keane, M. (2011). Are African Americans effectively represented in congress? Political Research Quarterly, 64, 145-156.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harden, J. J. (2016). Multidimensional democracy: A supply and demand theory of representation in American legislatures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Herring, M. (1990). Legislative responsiveness to black constituents in three deep south states. Journal of Politics, 52, 740-758.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Highton, B., Rocca, M. S. (2005). Beyond the roll-call arena: The determinants of position taking in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 303-316.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Jacobs, L. R., Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88, 560-576.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kirkland, J. H., Harden, J. J. (2016). Representation, competing principals, and waffling on bills in U.S. legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41, 657-686.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lawrence, E. D., Maltzman, F., Smith, S. S. (2006). Who wins? Party effects in legislative voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31, 33-69.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lax, J., Phillips, J. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367-386.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lax, J., Phillips, J. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 148-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Miler, K. C. (2010). Constituency representation in congress: The view from Capitol Hill. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599-626.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Platt, M. B., Sinclair-Chapman, V. (2008, January 9-12). Legislative problem-solving: Exploring bill sponsorship in post-war America. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Google Scholar
Rocca, M. S., Gordon, S. B. (2010). The position-taking value of bill sponsorship in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 387-397.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rocca, M. S., Sanchez, G. R. (2008). The effect of race and ethnicity on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in congress. American Politics Research, 36, 130-152.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sanburn, J. (2015). These 3 maps show where the great recession hit hardest. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://time.com/4133963/us-census-poverty-income-great-recession/
Google Scholar
Schiller, W. (1995). Senators as political entrepreneurs: Using bill sponsorship to shape legislative agendas. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 186-203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Shipan, C. R., Lowry, W. R. (2001). Environmental policy and party divergence in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 245-263.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stewart, C., Woon, J. (2017). Congressional committee assignments, 103rd to 114th congresses, 1993–2017. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar
Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How opinion movements shape American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sulkin, T. (2005). Issue politics in congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sulkin, T. (2009). Campaign appeals and legislative action. Journal of Politics, 71, 1093-1108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tate, K. (2001). The political representation of blacks in congress: Does race matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 623-638.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C. (2013). Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. Journal of Politics, 75, 330-342.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Verba, S. (1996). The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy. Presidential address, American political science association, 1995. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 1-7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Volden, C., Wiseman, A. E. (2014). Legislative effectiveness in the United States Congress: The lawmakers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Warshaw, C., Rodden, J. (2012). How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues? Journal of Politics, 74, 203-219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Whitby, K. J. (2002). Bill sponsorship and intraracial voting among African American representatives. American Politics Research, 30, 93-109.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wilson, W. C. (2010). Descriptive representation and Latino interest bill sponsorship in congress. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 1043-1062.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981-1000.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wlezien, C. (1996). Dynamics of representation: The case of U.S. spending on defence. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 81-103.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Woon, J. (2008). Bill sponsorship in congress: The moderating effect of agenda positions on legislative proposals. Journal of Politics, 70, 201-216.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Woon, J. (2009). Issue attention and legislative proposals in the U.S. senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 29-54.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

APR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $342.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top